Tenet's Share of the Shame
http://news.yahoo.com/s/uc/20070503/cm_uc_crjcox/op_452668
Thu May 3, 3:00 AM ET
 
 
While the natural human fascination with gossip and backbiting among our
rulers guarantees media coverage and best-seller status for George Tenet's
new memoir, the former        CIA director cannot achieve absolution in
print or on television. His clumsy attempts to shift the blame to Vice
President        Dick Cheney and Secretary of State        Condoleezza Rice
and their rebuttals are titillating but ultimately pointless. He is right
about them, of course, but they are right about him, too.
 
History will absolve none of them. With thousands of Americans and Iraqis
dead and national honor permanently tarnished, there is more than enough
blame to go around. 
 
As a group of former intelligence officers observed in a letter they sent to
Tenet upon the publication of "At the Center of the Storm: My Years at the
CIA," his outrage over the misleading propaganda that led to the war is
belated and utterly self-serving. During the critical months between
September 2002 and March 2003, in the midst of that White House campaign, he
was nothing but the useful tool of those he now criticizes. 
 
>From the beginning, Tenet knew that his colleagues in the White House and
the National Security Council were concocting a case for war that went far
beyond any reliable intelligence about        Saddam Hussein's arsenal and
intentions. He knew that his best field officers and most competent analysts
didn't believe the warnings about an Iraqi "mushroom cloud." He also knew
that they had no convincing evidence of ties between Saddam and al Qaeda. 
 
Yet while Cheney and Rice lied dramatically on national television,
persuading the majority of Americans that        Iraq was indeed behind the
9/11 attacks, Tenet maintained a discreet silence - except when he was
enabling them. 
 
Now, however, Tenet hopes to be seen as the truth-teller among those
prevaricators. Promoting his book on "60 Minutes" on Sunday evening, he
vehemently denounced the White House spinning of 9/11 to justify the war. At
one point, CBS correspondent Scott Pelley suggested that he should have
pushed back harder against that spin, reading from a speech in which the
president warned that "we need to think about Saddam Hussein using al Qaeda
to do his dirty work." Pelley then asked: "Is that what you [were] telling
the president?" 
 
The former CIA chief replied indignantly. No, he said, "we didn't believe al
Qaeda was going to do Saddam Hussein's dirty work." Why, then, did he
emphasize the alleged connections between al Qaeda and Iraq when he
testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee in February 2003? The
answer is that he knew what the White House wanted, and he delivered the
message that helped to sell the war. 
 
Tenet played the stooge over and over again during those months. In October
2002, he signed the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, a fatally skewed
assessment of the dangers posed by that ruined country. In January 2003, he
let the White House pretend that Iraq was seeking to obtain uranium from
Africa. And in February 2003, as Secretary of State        Colin Powell
presented a series of bogus assertions to the        United Nations and
forever disgraced himself and his country, Tenet sat behind him in silent,
nodding confirmation of those falsehoods. 
 
Perhaps the most pitiful argument mustered by Tenet to defend himself today
is his attempt to rebut the "slam-dunk" anecdote.        President Bush and
other members of the administration have said that the CIA director assured
them the intelligence proving the existence of Saddam's terrible arsenal was
unassailable. He whines that his basketball cliche has been misinterpreted,
because he was only promising the president that a strong argument could be
made, not that the information itself was perfect. More plausibly, he also
notes that the decision to invade had been reached long before that little
warmongering pep rally in the Oval Office. 
 
But so what? Tenet sat and listened as the president told us, untruthfully,
that no such decision had been made - and that war would only be waged as a
"last resort." He doesn't deny encouraging Bush's war salesmanship, even
though he doubted the wisdom of that policy and the process that had led to
it. His fitful protests against the worst lies uttered by Cheney and Rice
had no effect because he refused to risk his own position on behalf of
truth. 
 
Bleating about his damaged reputation, Tenet sounds much like Powell, whose
loyalty to the president overruled duty to the country. Tenet got a medal
and a multimillion-dollar book contract, but he forfeited his honor, and
that cannot be retrieved. 
 
 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to