HOME-GROWN JIHADIS (JUNDULLAH) IN UK & US

INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM MONITOR---PAPER NO.231

By B. Raman

Paper no. 2236

06.05.2007

http://saag.org/%5Cpapers23%5Cpaper2236.html

 

(To be read in continuation of my earlier article of 3-5-03 titled "AL QAEDA
& LASHKAR-E-TOIBA " at http://www.saag.org/papers7/paper678.html , the
article of 2-7-03 titled " LET: Al Qaeda's Clone" at
http://www.saag.org/papers8/paper729.html,  and the article of 5-5-07 titled
"Countering Jihadi Terrorism in UK" at
http://www.saag.org/papers23/paper2235.html. Jundullah means "Army of Allah"
or "Soldiers of Allah". The free-lance jihadis, who have been increasingly
taking to terrorism in different parts of the world since the US-led
invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003, look upon themselves as the
"Soldiers of Allah", not belonging to any organisation----not even to Al
Qaeda)

     

 

This is my second article analysing the British fertiliser bomb case in
which the judgement was delivered by a British court on April 30,2007. In my
earlier article, I had referred to the extensive roots taken by the
Pakistanised version of Al Qaeda in the UK and the danger of this spreading
to the US and Canada.

 

2. From this, one should not jump to the conclusion that the US is not yet
facing threats from home-grown jihadis of Pakistani origin in its territory.
It has been since the 1980s. The very active US and Canada-based cadres of
the Jamaat-ul-Fuqra (JIF), a Pakistani jihadi organisation with headquarters
in Lahore, were the first generation of home-grown jihadis in the US and
Canada. They used to indulge in fire-bomb attacks on Hindu and Jewish places
of worship in different parts of these two countries in the 1980s. They had
also alarmingly penetrated the security forces of some States in the
Caribbean. At that time, there was no Al Qaeda or the International Islamic
Front (IIF) and yet, the intelligence agencies of these two countries were
greatly concerned over the threat posed by this organisation to their
internal security. The intelligence officers of the US and Canada, with whom
I used to interact,  used to describe the JUF as the most secretive and
security-conscious jihadi organisation of Pakistan. Daniel Pearl, the US
journalist, paid with his life in the beginning of 2002 for trying to make
enquiries into the suspected links of Richard Reid, the so-called shoe
bomber, with this organisation.

 

3. After 9/11, many US cells of Pakistani jihadi organisations have been
detected and neutralised by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). I
would  give two examples only. There are many more. On June 20, 2003, FBI
officials had disclosed that they had arrested in April Lyman Faris, also
known as Mohammad Rauf, originally a resident of Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir
(POK), who had migrated to the US in 1994 and was working as a truck driver
in Ohio and charged him with having links with Al Qaeda and Khalid Sheikh
Mohammad. According to FBI officials, as quoted in the US media, Faris had
visited Afghanistan and Pakistan a number of times between 2000 and 2002,
met  Osama bin Laden and worked with Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, in organising
and financing jihadi causes.  After returning to the US from Pakistan in
late 2002, officials said, he began examining the Brooklyn Bridge and
discussing via coded messages with Al Qaeda leaders in Pakistan ways of
using blow torches to sever the suspension cables. "The plotting continued
through March, as Faris sent coded messages to operatives in Pakistan. One
such message said that the "weather is too hot. " FBI officials were quoted
as saying  that meant that Faris feared the plot was unlikely to
succeed---apparently because of security and the bridge's structure-- and
should be postponed.  He was arrested soon thereafter.  According to media
reports, the interrogation of Khalid led the FBI to Faris. Sources in
Pakistan described Faris, aged 34, as a Punjabi ex-serviceman settled in
POK, before he migrated to the US.  He was associated in the past with the
JUF, before he gravitated to Al Qaeda.

 

4.  On June 27, 2003, the FBI charged seven men in the Washington area and
an eighth in Philadelphia with stockpiling weapons and conspiring to wage
"jihad" against India in support of a terrorist group in Kashmir.  The FBI's
charge-sheet against them described them as members of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (
LET).  It also said that three others involved in the case were absconding
and were believed to be in Saudi Arabia.  Although the FBI officials said
that there was no evidence of a plot against the US, the members of the
group had  pledged support for pro-Muslim violence overseas, hoarded
high-powered rifles and received military training in Pakistan. Nine of the
11 accused are American citizens, and three had served in the US armed
forces for some time in the past.  The charge-sheet said that seven members
of the group had travelled to Pakistan in the last several years, and some
received military training in small arms, machine guns, grenade launchers
and other weaponry at a camp in northeast Pakistan connected to the LET.

 

5.  The 41-count charge-sheet, or  indictment as it is called in the USA,
charged the 11 accused with conspiracy, firearms violations and plotting
against a friendly nation - namely, India. US officials connected with the
investigation were quoted by the media as saying that there was no evidence
that the accused were considering an attack within the United States or had
ties to Al Qaeda.  And officials were careful not to describe the group as a
"sleeper cell" - a term used to characterize suspected terrorist supporters
in Lackawanna, N.Y., Seattle and elsewhere arrested in 2002, some of whom
were connected with the Tablighi Jamaat (TJ) of Pakistan.  However, the
officials charged that the men conspired to help Muslims abroad in violent
jihad not only in India, but also in Chechnya, the Philippines and other
countries. The men, the charge-sheet said, obtained AK-47s and other
high-powered weaponry and practised small-unit military tactics in Virginia.

 

6.  The indictment charged that the accused pledged their willingness to die
as martyrs in support of the Muslim cause and gathered in private homes and
at an Islamic center in suburban Washington to hear lectures "on the
righteousness of jihad" in Kashmir, Chechnya and elsewhere. They also
watched videotapes showing Muslim fighters engaged in jihad.  They had also
organised a function to  celebrate  the crashing  of the space shuttle
Columbia.  One of the astronauts killed in the crash was of Indian origin.
A message read out on the occasion had described the USA "as the greatest
enemy of the Muslims."  According to the indictment, one of the accused
Masoud Ahmed Khan, a Maryland resident, had a document titled "The
Terrorist's Handbook," with instructions on how to manufacture and use
explosives and chemicals as weapons, as well as a photograph of F.B.I.
headquarters in Washington.   At least two of the 11 accused were described
as of  Pakistani origin. One of them,  Mohammed Aatique, 30, was a work
(H-1) visa holder while Khawja Mahmood Hasan, 27, was a naturalized US
citizen born in Pakistan.

 

7.  Thus, there have been home-grown jihadis in the US too  as there were
and as there are in the UK, but in the US these home-grown jihadis---more
Pakistanis than Arabs--- have not so far been able to organise any act of
terrorism because of the strict surveillance on them by the FBI and the
ruthless action taken against them. It must be said to the credit of the
Americans that after their traumatic experience of 9/11, in matters likely
to affect their homeland security, they do not allow political
considerations to come in the way of their ruthless action against anybody
considered as likely to pose a threat to their homeland security.  They have
not allowed their soft corner for Pakistan and its President General Pervez
come in the way of ruthless action against their Pakistani residents, if and
when called for.

 

8. To understand as to why home-grown jihadis already pose a serious threat
to the UK, but not yet to the US and Canada, one has to consider the
policies of successive British Governments to terrorists and extremists from
other countries. After Pakistan and Afghanistan, the UK has been
traditionally for many years the largest sanctuary to foreign terrorists and
extremists. Everbody, who is somebody in the world of terrorism, has found a
rear base in the UK--- the Khalistanis in the past, the Liberation Tigers of
Tamil Eelam (LTTE), the Mirpuris from Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK), the
Chechens, the Al Muhajiroun, the Hizbut Tehrir etc. Having allowed such a
medley of terrorists and extremists to operate unchecked from their
territory for so long, the British intelligence just does not have a correct
estimate of how many sleeper cells are operating from their country and of
which organisations.

 

9. Since persons of Pakistani origin have been playing an increasingly
active role in promoting the activities of Al Qaeda, it is necessary to
analyse the nature of migration from Pakistan to the UK and the US. Muslims
from Pakistan constitute the single largest Muslim migrant group from the
sub-continent in both the UK and the US---followed by Indian and Bangladeshi
Muslims. There are estimated to be about 700,000 Muslims of Pakistani origin
in the UK. No estimate is available in respect of the US.

 

10.The largest migrant group from Pakistan in the UK are Punjabi-speaking
Muslims----from Pakistani Punjab as well as  Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir
(POK). The migrants from the POK are called Mirpuris. They are not ethnic
Kashmiris, but Punjabi-speaking migrants from the Pakistani Punjab, whose
families had settled down in the Mirpur area of the POK for generations.
They were essentially small farmers and landless labourers, who lost their
livelihood as a result of the construction of the Mangla dam. They,
therefore, migrated to West Europe---the largest number to the UK and a
smaller number to France, Germany and the Scandinavian countries. Many of
them preferred to go to the UK because it already had a large
Punjabi-speaking community from Pakistani Punjab. The initial Mirpuri
migrants, who hardly spoke English, felt themselves comfortable in a
Punjabi-speaking environment.

 

11. As the number of Muslims of Pakistani origin in the UK increased,
mosques came up to cater to their religious needs. Till 1977, these mosques
were headed by  clerics from the more tolerant Barelvi Sunni sect. When
Gen.Zia-ul-Haq, a devout Deobandi, captured power in Pakistan in 1977, he
embarked on a policy of marginalising the influence of Barelvi clerics not
only in Pakistan, but also in Europe and increasing the influence of the
rabid Deobandis. He inducted Deobandis into the Education Department as Arab
teachers and into the Armed Forces to cater to the religious needs of the
military personnel. He encouraged and helped the Deobandis to take over the
mosques in Pakistan and in the UK by replacing the Barelvis. With the
induction of an increasing number of Deobandis started the process of the
Arabisation/Wahabisation of the Muslims in Pakistan and of the Pakistani
diaspora in the UK.

 

12. The intelligence agencies of the US and the UK went along with Zia's
policy of Arabising/Wahabising the Muslims of Pakistan because this
contributed to an increase in the flow of  jihadi terrorists to fight
against the Soviet troops in Afghanistan. Till 1983, the members of the
Pakistani diaspora in the UK were considered a largely law-abiding people.
The first signs of the radicalisation of the diaspora appeared in 1983 when
a group of jihadi terrorists kidnapped Ravi Mhatre, an Indian diplomat
posted in the Indian Assistant High Commission in Birmingham, and demanded
the release of  Maqbool Butt, the leader of the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation
Front (JKLF), who was then awaiting execution in the Tihar jail in Delhi
following his conviction on charges of murder. When the Government of India
rejected their demand, the terrorists  killed Mhatre and threw his dead body
into  one of the streets. This kidnapping and murder was allegedly
orchestrated by Amanullah Khan, a Gilgiti from Pakistan. He was assisted by
some Mirpuris of the Pakistani diaspora. The British were unco-operative
with India in the investigation of this case and declined to hand over those
involved in the kidnapping and murder to India for investigation and
prosecution. By closing their eyes to the terrorist activities of the
Mirpuris from their territory, they encouraged the further radicalisation of
the diaspora.

 

13. Just as the radicalisation of the Muslims of Pakistan suited the US-UK
agenda in Afghanistan, the radicalisation of the diaspora in the UK,
particularly the Mirpuris, suited their agenda for balkanising Yugoslavia in
the 1990s. Many Pakistanis from the UK went to the training camps of the
Harkat-ul-Ansar (HUA---now called the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen) and the
Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET) in Pakistan and got themselves trained with the
knowledge and complicity of the British. They then went to Bosnia and Kosovo
to wage a jihad against the Serbs with arms and ammunition and explosives
allegedly supplied by the Iranian intelligence with the tacit consent of the
Clinton Administration  and paid for by the Saudi intelligence. As the
Pakistani Prime Minister between 1993 and 1996, Mrs. Benazir Bhutto had
visited these jihadis from the Pakistani diaspora in the UK who were waging
a jihad against the Serbs in Bosnia. After waging their jihad against the
Serbs, these jihadis from the UK moved to Pakistan to join the HUA and the
LET and participate in the jihad against India.

 

14. The most notable example of  the home-grown jihadis of the diaspora in
the UK, who waged a jihad in Bosnia at the instance of the British and
American intelligence and then turned against them, is Omar Sheikh. From
Bosnia, he came to India to wage a jihad and was arrested by the Indian
security forces. He was released by the then Indian Government headed by Mr.
A.B.Vajpayee, in December,1999, following the hijacking of an Indian
Airlines plane to Kandahar by a group of HUM terrorists from Pakistan. After
his release, he went to Pakistan and orchestrated the kidnapping and murder
of Daniel Pearl. The second notable example is Rashid Rauf, a Mirpuri, who
went to Pakistan from the UK to join the Jaish-e-Mohammad (JEM)  after
marrying a relative of Maulana Masood Azhar, the Amir of the JEM. He was
allegedly involved in the plot detected by the London Police in August last
year to blow up a number of US-bound planes. This plot was hatched by some
members of the Pakistani diaspora in the UK.

 

15. The Mirpuris in the Pakistani diaspora in the UK  were in the forefront
of those supporting jihadi terrorism against India in Jammu and Kashmir and
other parts of India since 1993, when the Pakistani jihadi organisations of
Afghan vintage were infiltrated into India by Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI). They collected and sent funds to the jihadi terrorists
in India. Many of them underwent training in the camps of the LET, the HUM,
the JEM and the Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HUJI) in Pakistan and assisted
them in their jihadi operations. The British intelligence was aware of
members of the Pakistani diaspora going to Pakistan for training, but closed
its eyes to it since it thought that they were going to wage a jihad against
the Indians in J&K.

 

16. A careful examination of the details relating to the various jihadi
terrorism-related cases in the UK would reveal that the MI 5 was
intercepting the telephone conversations of these Mirpuris and other Punjabi
Muslims with their friends and relatives in which they spoke of their going
to Pakistan for jihadi training. It did not take any action against them
because it thought that they were going to wage a jihad only against the
Indians and hence did not pose a threat to the British. The MI 5 intercepted
the telephone conversation of even one of the perpetrators of the London
blasts of July 2005, about his going to Pakistan for jihadi training. It did
not act on it thinking he intended to wage a jihad against the Indians. Only
after the London blasts of July, 2005, did the MI 5 realise with a rude
shock that this Mirpuri was  talking not of going to India to wage a jihad
against the Indians, but to London to wage a jihad against the British.

 

17. There is a sheepish, but indirect  admission of this in the statement
issued by the MI 5 rebutting criticism of its  perceived failure to prevent
the London blasts. It says: "RUMOUR: In February 2004, the Security Service
recorded Khan's (Mohammed Siddique Khan) wish to fight and him saying
goodbye to his family - a clear indication that he intended a suicide
mission. REALITY: The Security Service did record conversations involving an
individual identified after 7 July as Khan. From the context of the recorded
conversation it is probable that Khan was talking about going to fight with
militia groups in the Pakistan border areas. He was not talking about acts
of terrorism in the UK."

 

18. Today, innocent British civilians are paying for the sins of commission
and omission of their authorities since jihadi terrorism broke out in Indian
territory in 1989. It would be very difficult for the MI 5 to have an
accurate idea of the number of trained Pakistani jihadis already in their
midst. Reliable Police sources in Pakistan say that there are at least about
200 trained, potential suicide bombers in the Pakistani diaspora in the UK
waiting for an opportunity to strike.  These trained potential suicide
bombers also provide a recruitment reservoir for future operations of Al
Qaeda in the US homeland.

 

19. The position in the Pakistani diaspora in the US is somewhat different.
The initial wave of migrants to the US from Pakistan consisted largely of
Urdu-speaking Mohajirs from Sindh, who originally went to Pakistan from
India. The influence of the more tolerant Barelvi sect on them is still very
strong. The extremist Deobandi/Wahabi ideology has not yet made the same
impact on  them as it has on the Punjabi-speaking Pakistani diaspora in the
UK.  Moreover, there has hardly been any migration of the Mirpuris from the
POK into the US. Most of the Kashmiri migration into the US has been of
ethnic Kashmiris----either the Hindu Pandits, who were driven out of the
Valley by the jihadi terrorists after 1989, or sufi Muslims from the Valley.
The Muslims from the valley, who had migrated to the US from J&K, are
politically active against India, but they have so far kept away from the
Deobandis and Wahabis.

 

20. Since the 1980s, there has been an increase in the migration of
Punjabi-speaking Muslims from Pakistan into the US. There has been growing
Deobandi/Wahabi influence on them. It is these elements that Al Qaeda has
been targeting for recruitment. A saving grace is that the US intelligence
has a better awareness than the British of the dangers that could arise from
its population of Pakistani origin and has been keeping a tight watch on
them. The British are paying a heavy price for their negligence till now.

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to