http://www.worldpoliticswatch.com/Article.aspx?id=762

Homeland Security Authorities Fear Chemical Terrorism in U.S. 

Richard Weitz | Bio <file:///C:/author.aspx?id=102>  | 09 May 2007 
World Politics Watch Exclusive <http://www.worldpoliticswatch.com/>  

WASHINGTON -- In recent months, federal and state homeland security
officials have become increasingly concerned that terrorists and other
groups might attempt to imitate the insurgents in Iraq and employ
chlorine-bombs and other chemical weapons within the United States.

Even before insurgents in Iraq began detonating trucks carrying bombs
combining conventional explosive with industrial chlorine, U.S. government
and non-government experts had identified the United States as potentially
vulnerable to terrorist attacks against chemical plants or rail tankers
transporting toxic chemicals such as chlorine. In their "National Planning
Scenarios
<http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/nationalsecurity/earlywarning
/NationalPlanningScenariosApril2005.pdf>
<http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/nationalsecurity/earlywarning
/NationalPlanningScenariosApril2005.pdf> " (pdf file), analysts at the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) identified a dozen possible homeland
security incidents the department views as most plausible or devastating.
One scenario involved the hypothetical detonation of a large chlorine
storage tank that killed 17,500 people and injured more than 100,000. 



In the annual FBI threat assessment
<http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2007_hr/011107transcript.pdf>
<http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2007_hr/011107transcript.pdf>  (pdf file)
delivered to the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence in January 2007,
Director Robert Mueller stated that the acquisition of WMD by terrorist
groups "continues to be a growing concern." In Mueller's assessment, while
terrorists may not currently possess the capabilities to produce the complex
biological and chemical agents necessary to carry out a large-scale attack,
"their capability will improve as they pursue enhancing their scientific
knowledge base, including recruiting scientists to assist them."

In late February 2007, then-Director of National Intelligence John
Negroponte stated
<http://www.iwar.org.uk/homesec/resources/threats-2006/negroponte-02-28-06.p
df>
<http://www.iwar.org.uk/homesec/resources/threats-2006/negroponte-02-28-06.p
df>  (pdf file) that U.S. "intelligence reporting indicates that nearly 40
terrorist organizations, insurgencies or cults have used, possessed, or
expressed an interest in chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear
agents or weapons." He added, however, that most of these groups are only
able to carry out "small-scale" unconventional attacks such as employing
poisons or using "improvised chemical devises" like the chlorine bombs in
Iraq.

Nonetheless, according to Lt. Gen. Michael D. Maples
<http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2007_hr/022707maples.pdf>
<http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2007_hr/022707maples.pdf>  (pdf file), the
U.S. intelligence community believes that al-Qaida and other terrorist
groups are pursuing the capability to employ biological and chemical agents
such as ricin, botulinum toxin, cyanide, anthrax, sarin, and mustard gases.
Suicide terrorists may prove especially effective at using CW. Since they
are prepared to die in the attack, they do not wear CW defensive gear or
take other measures that might alert authorities to the threat.

The most likely target for terrorists seeking to release large quantities of
chlorine are the railcars that traverse the United States carrying enormous
90-ton tanks of chlorine. U.S. railroads annually carry 1.7 million
shipments of hazardous materials, of which 100,000 are toxic chemicals prone
to become airborne in an accident. About 80 percent of these latter
shipments consist of chlorine. Thirty-seven water utilities in the country
still receive chlorine gas by rail, generating 45,000 shipments annually. A
March 2007 report by the Center for American Progress
<http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/04/pdf/chemical_security_report
.pdf>
<http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/04/pdf/chemical_security_report
.pdf>  (pdf file) cited the Iraqi insurgent attacks to justify its
assessment that "railcars of chlorine gas represent a distinct national
security vulnerability."


In announcing various measures to increase domestic rail security,
<http://www.tsa.gov/press/releases/2006/press_release_12152006.shtm> DHS
Secretary Michael Chertoff warned
<http://www.tsa.gov/press/releases/2006/press_release_12152006.shtm> ,"A
toxic emission from an attack against a chemical facility or hazardous
chemicals in transit is among the most serious risks facing America's
highest threat areas." The U.S. Naval Research Lab estimated that, depending
on weather conditions and time of day, a rupture of a tanker car containing
chlorine in the Washington, D.C., area could kill 100,000 people in half an
hour. Other experts anticipate that a 90-ton release of liquid chlorine from
the Kuehne Chemical Corporation in New Jersey could kill 12 million people.

In response to such threats, on April 3, 2007, the Department of Homeland
Security announced new regulations, scheduled to take effect this summer,
aimed at enhancing security at U.S. industrial chemical facilities. In
<http://www.nypost.com/seven/03232007/news/regionalnews/chlorine_bombs_put_c
ity_on_alert_regionalnews_murray_weiss.htm> New York City
<http://www.nypost.com/seven/03232007/news/regionalnews/chlorine_bombs_put_c
ity_on_alert_regionalnews_murray_weiss.htm> , the police force's
counterterrorist experts are analyzing the Iraq incidents and enhancing
their surveillance of chlorine stockpiles in the metropolitan area. A senior
member of the force explained that, "It only make sense when we see a new
iteration involving explosives, in this case the use of chlorine, that we
would be taking a close, hard look at it [the threat]."

The U.S. intelligence community and the FBI have undertaken a comprehensive
study of the chlorine attacks in Iraq in order to avert similar chemical
weapons attacks throughout U.S. territory. In mid-April 2007, Assistant
Homeland Security Secretary Robert Stephen told a meeting of the National
Infrastructure Advisory Council that, "We are truly analyzing the living
daylights out of these attacks." 

At the local level, many communities are seeking to reduce their use of
chlorine and instead employ safer chemicals for disinfecting water,
manufacturing products, and other purposes. Although these alternatives are
generally more expensive than chlorine, the attacks in Iraq have
appropriately persuaded many localities of the imperative of reducing U.S.
vulnerability to chemical terrorism.



 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to