http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=2824
<http://globalpolitician.com/articledes.asp?ID=2824&cid=3&sid=105>
&cid=3&sid=105
 
Beheading Nations: The Islamization of Europe’s Cities
Fjordman - 5/18/2007 
We have seen videos on TV of Muslim Jihadis beheading infidel hostages. Less
attention has been paid to the fact that Muslims are beheading entire nation
states. Although this is happening in slow motion, it is no less dramatic.
Historically, the major cities have constituted a country’s “head,” the seat
of most of its political institutions and the largest concentration of its
cultural brainpower. What happens when this “head” is cut off from the rest
of the body?

In many countries across Western Europe, Muslim immigrants tend to settle in
major cities, with the native population retreating to minor cities or into
the countryside. Previously, Europeans or non-Europeans could travel between
countries and visit new cities, each with its own, distinctive character and
peculiarities. Soon, you will travel from London to Paris, Amsterdam or
Stockholm and find that you have left one city dominated by burkas and
sharia to find… yet another city dominated by burkas and sharia.

For some reason, this eradication of unique, urban cultures is to be
celebrated as “cultural diversity.” Britain’s population is projected to
rise by more than seven million in the next 25 years. The predictions were
even greater than those made by the Migrationwatch UK think-tank, whose
forecasts had been dismissed in the past as alarmist. Sir Andrew Green, the
chairman of Migrationwatch, said the figures were “staggering.” “They
totally demolish the Government’s claim that it has a ‘managed migration’
policy. In fact they show that immigration into the UK is out of control.”
British citizenship has been granted to nearly one million foreign nationals
since Labour and Tony Blair came to power in 1997. “Grants of citizenship
have quadrupled under the present Government. This is a direct result of
their ‘no limits’ immigration policy.” “Immigration on this scale is
changing the nature of our society without public consent. It is no longer
acceptable.”

More white families are moving from London to the regions while many
immigrants arrive in the capital from overseas. Migrationwatch said that the
change in 10 years had been “extraordinarily rapid” and “unprecedented.”
Whites will soon become a minority in Birmingham and other major British
cities, posing a “critical” challenge to social stability, Britain’s race
relations watchdog warned. Statistics showed that white and ethnic minority
communities were becoming increasingly segregated.

“Asian youths,” a British euphemism for Pakistanis and Muslims from South
Asia, in parts of Oldham are trying to create no-go areas for white people.
One of them told: “There are signs all around saying whites enter at your
risk. It’s a matter of revenge.” However, it’s not just the white natives
that are targets of Muslim violence, but other non-Muslims, too. A report on
Hindus being driven out of the English city of Bradford by young Muslims was
described by some Hindus as “ethnic cleansing.” Some of them want to leave
the city to escape the “Talibanization of Bradford.”

In an online story in newspaper The Daily Telegraph that was removed “for
legal reasons,” former Muslim Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo warned that British
Muslims could soon form a state within the state. Dr Sookhdeo believed that
“in a decade, you will see parts of English cities which are controlled by
Muslim clerics and which follow, not the common law, but aspects of Muslim
sharia law.” “In 1980, the Islamic Council of Europe laid out their strategy
for the future – and the fundamental rule was never dilute your presence.
That is to say, do not integrate.” “Rather, concentrate Muslim presence in a
particular area until you are a majority in that area, so that the
institutions of the local community come to reflect Islamic structures. The
education system will be Islamic, the shops will serve only halal food,
there will be no advertisements showing naked or semi-naked women, and so
on.”

The next step will be pushing the Government to recognize sharia law for
Muslim communities – which will be backed up by the claim that it is
“racist” or “Islamophobic” to deny them this. Sookhdeo noted that there is
already a Sharia Law Council for the UK. “There are Muslim men in Britain
who marry and divorce three women, then marry a fourth time – and stay
married, in sharia law, to all four.” “The more fundamentalist clerics think
that it is only a matter of time before they will persuade the Government to
concede on the issue of sharia law. Given the Government's record of
capitulating, you can see why they believe that.”

In France, Muslims already have many smaller states within the state.
Criminologist Lucienne Bui Trong wrote that: “From 106 hot points in 1991,
we went to 818 sensitive areas in 1999.” The term she used, “sensitive
areas,” was used to describe Muslim no-go zones where anything representing
a Western institution (post office truck, firemen, even mail order delivery
firms) was routinely ambushed with Molotov cocktails. The number was 818 in
2002, when the French government decided to stop collecting the statistics.

In some of these areas, the phenomenon of gang rape “has become banal.”
Violence against and pressure on women is part of daily life in the suburbs,
where boys can dictate how girls should dress. Pressure is mounting for
Muslim women to wear veils. In 2002, a 17-year-old girl was set alight by an
18-year-old boy as his friends stood by. The support group “Ni Putes, Ni
Soumises” (“Neither Whores nor Submissives”) says the number of forced
marriages has risen in recent years, with roughly 70,000 girls pressured
into unwanted relationships each year in France. A leaked study conducted
between October 2003 and May 2004 under the auspices of France’s
inspector-general of education, Jean Pierre Obin, described an educational
system where Muslim students regularly boycotted classes that concerned
Voltaire, Rousseau and Moliere, whom the students accused of being
anti-Islamic. Orbin’s report cited Muslim students’ refusal to use the
“plus” sign in mathematics because it looks like a crucifix; Muslims
boycotting class trips to churches, cathedrals and monasteries; and forcing
wholesale changes in school lunch fare to accommodate their religious
practices.

The influence of radical Islamist groups is a growing threat to French
business, too, a leading intelligence expert warned, citing the discovery of
secret prayer-rooms at the Disneyland theme-park outside Paris. A report
commissioned by several retail and courier companies stated that the
Islamists’ strategy is to “take control of Muslims within the workforce” and
then “challenge the rules in order to impose Islamic values.” French
Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy said that the riots in 2005 were rather
“well organized.” Caroline Glick of the Jerusalem Post noted that some
Muslim leaders explained that what they wanted was autonomy in their
ghettos: “They seek to receive extraterritorial status from the French
government, meaning that they will set their own rules based, one can
assume, on Sharia law. If the French government accepts the notion of
communal autonomy, France will cease to be a functioning state.” Following
three weeks of unrest, the police said 98 vehicles torched in one day marked
a “return to a normal situation everywhere in France.” Some of the rioters
left boasting messages on various Internet forums. “We aren’t going to let
up. The French won’t do anything and soon, we will be in the majority here.”
One observer stated: “In France, the majority of young Muslims believe that
French society is dying, committing suicide. More like 10 percent to 20
percent of them believe that they are in the process of replacing European
civilization with an Islamic one.” In the southern city of Marseille,
Muslims make up at least a quarter of the population, and rising fast.

In the Netherlands, Muslims will soon make up the majority in all major
cities. “Today, we have 1 million Muslims out of 16 million Dutch,”
according to Frits Bolkestein, Dutch politician and former EU Commissioner.
“Within 10 years, they will have an absolute majority in both Amsterdam and
Rotterdam. We are staring into the face of a shortly to be divided
community. Muslims have the right to their own schools, so there is no
teaching of evolution, gay teachers are not tolerated but anti-Semitism is.”
A researcher for the Netherlands Ministry for Immigration and Integration
found that 40% of young Moroccan Muslims in the Netherlands rejected Western
values and democracy. Six to seven percent were prepared to use force to
“defend” Islam, and the majority were opposed to freedom of speech for
offensive statements, particularly criticism of Islam.

We are witnessing a dramatic change in Europe, which men like Bolkestein see
as underlined by a drop in national confidence in European countries over
the entirety of the last century. The immigration problem, he said, “has to
do with the loss of confidence in one’s own civilization. It started with
World War II, which was really a mass European suicide. Then, the rise of
fascism, the Holocaust and the 1968 student cultural revolutions across
Europe. There is no clear European identity today. This has a real impact on
foreign policy.”

Douglas Murray attended a conference in memory of the murdered Islam critic
Pim Fortuyn in 2006, and noted with concern the strict security measures and
what he saw as a nation under siege. “All across Europe, debate on Islam is
being stopped. Italy’s greatest living writer, Oriana Fallaci, soon comes up
for trial in her home country, and in Britain the government seems intent on
pushing through laws that would make truths about Islam and the conduct of
its followers impossible to voice. Europe is shuffling into darkness. It is
proving incapable of standing up to its enemies, and in an effort to
accommodate the peripheral rights of a minority is failing to protect the
most basic rights of its own people.” A survey in April 2005, after the
murder of another critic of Islam, Theo van Gogh, indicated that 32 percent
of Dutch people wanted to emigrate abroad.

They leave what was once their country in favor of people such as Dyab Abu
Jahjah, founder of the Arab European League (AEL). The AEL, founded in
Belgium in 2000, now has branches in the Netherlands and France, and intends
to spread across the EU. Jahjah, who has called the 9/11 attacks “sweet
revenge,” recruits Muslim youth to spread his ideology, which calls for the
introduction of sharia in Europe. “We have three basic demands,” he says.
“Bilingual education for Arab-speaking kids, hiring quotas that protect
Muslims, and the right to keep our cultural customs.” “Assimilation is
cultural rape. It means renouncing your identity, becoming like the others.”
Jahjah has also demanded that Arabic should be made an official language in
Belgium. Belgium’s Jews, in particular Antwerp’s Jewish diamond merchants,
have earlier felt threatened by the Arab European League (AEL), which issued
a statement: “The AEL calls on the Jewish community in Antwerp to cease its
support of, and distance itself from, the state of Israel. If not, attacks
in Antwerp are almost unpreventable.”

Security sources in Germany warned that the country was home to between
3,000 and 5,000 potential Islamic suicide attackers. A Berlin court in 2005
ruled that a well-known Turkish religious leader should be extradited to
Turkey. In his Berlin mosque he repeatedly said that “all Germans were
stinking people and doomed to go to hell because they were useless creatures
and infidels.” Shortly before, the press spokesman of this mosque had told
about the Turks’ strong interest in fostering good relations with native
Germans. TV correspondent Reinhard Laska feared that the opinions voiced by
the Imam were only the tip of the iceberg: “There was nobody in the mosque
who stood up and demanded that the Imam stop his nasty talk about Germans,”
he said. “Nobody seemed to mind at all.” In 2006, “Valley of the Wolves,” a
virulently anti-Semitic film about the Iraq war, sold out to cheering
audiences from Germany’s 2.5 million-strong Turkish community.

According to Der Spiegel, Germany’s and Europe’s biggest weekly magazine, an
estimated number of 50 women in Germany have been murdered in so-called
honor killings in the past decade. Their crime? Trying to break free and
live Western lifestyles. Within their communities, the killers are revered
as heroes for preserving their family dignity. Much of this insular and
ultra-religious world is out of public view, “often hidden in inner-city
apartments where the most influential links to the outside world are
satellite dishes that receive Turkish and Arabic television and the local
mosque.” “In these families, loyalty and honor are elevated virtues and
women are treated little better than slaves, unseen by society and often
unnoticed or ignored by their German neighbors.” It caused an outcry when a
group of 14-year-old Turkish boys mocked one victim during a class
discussion. “She deserved what she got. The whore lived like a German.”

In Denmark, the nation-wide organization of Women’s Crisis Centres claims
that a number of taxi drivers with immigrant background are spying on female
immigrants who are in hiding, sending information about their whereabouts to
their families. It was a group of taxi drivers who informed a Pakistani man
where he could find his sister. He murdered her in broad daylight outside a
train station because she had married a man from Afghanistan against her
family’s orders. 80% of the women seeking help at crisis centres in the city
of Oslo, Norway, are from immigrant background.

Non-western immigrants account for nearly 86% of the Norwegian capital’s
total population growth over the past ten years. Muslims make up such a high
percentage of cab drivers that it can be hard to obtain a taxi during
Islamic holidays. Blind people with their guide dogs are finding it
increasingly difficult to get a taxi ride, as demonstrated by a lady in the
city of Drammen outside Oslo. Grethe Olsen, accompanied by her guide dog
Isak, experienced being rejected by no less than 21 taxis before finally
getting a ride. Olsen thought the taxi drivers said no for religious
reasons. The Norwegian Blind Association confirmed that this is a well known
problem all over the country, especially in cities with many immigrants.
Dogs are considered extremely dirty animals in Islam and only permitted for
certain limited uses, such as guarding your property. Two hadith, traditions
relating to the words and deeds of Muhammad, state that: “The Prophet said,
‘Angels do not enter a house in which there is a dog or there are pictures’
and ‘Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) ordered the killing of dogs
and we would send (men) in Medina and its corners and we did not spare any
dog that we did not kill.’”

Mullah Krekar, former leader of Kurdish guerilla group Ansar-al-Islam, lives
in Oslo. He has praised Iraqi al-Qaida leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, has
stated that “Osama bin Laden is a good person” and that he was willing to
sacrifice himself for bin Laden. Krekar told an Oslo newspaper that there’s
a war going on between the West and Islam, and that he was sure that Islam
would win. Rumor has it that Krekar is such a respected man among many
fellow Muslims that he gets taxi rides for free. Which means that it is
easier to get a taxi ride in Norway’s capital if you praise Osama bin Laden
than if you are blind.

It has been reported that shopkeepers in certain areas of Oslo now need to
pay protection money. The criminals are more trigger-happy than ever, and
since many of them abide by the rules of blood vengeance, violence is
rapidly increasing. In Sweden, reports about criminal gangs and mafias, a
phenomenon that is growing day by day, are coming in from urban areas all
over the country, and a feeling of powerlessness is spreading among ordinary
citizens. “We have no other possibility than to flee from this area.
Families cannot fight against these problems alone. We are talking about
survival, you can get stabbed here. We can only survive by attempting to
avoid getting targeted.”

Feriz and Pajtim, members of youth gang Gangsta Albanian Thug Unit in the
Swedish city of Malmö, explain how they mug and beat people downtown. “Many
of us participated in gangs that fought against the Serbs during the war in
Kosovo. Violence is in our blood,” Feriz said. They target a lone victim and
make him a scapegoat. “We make it look like he bumped into one of us. Then
we have an opportunity to attack him. We surround him and beat and kick him
until he no longer fights back,” he said. “You are always many more people
than your victims. Cowardly?” “I have heard that from many, but I disagree.
The whole point is that they’re not supposed to have a chance.” Neither
Feriz nor Pajtim expressed any sympathy for their victims. “If they get
injured, they just have themselves to blame for being weak,” said Pajtim and
shrugged.

They bring with them a rather brutal culture to Sweden. A BBC article
described how the centuries-old custom of blood feuds has made a comeback in
Albania in recent years. “The law and order vacuum created by the collapse
of communism sent many Albanians back to the ancient customary laws of their
tribal roots.” “The Kanuns sanction blood feuds and regulate them from all
points of view,” said professor of law Ismet Elezi. “And first they
established the rule: whoever kills will be killed. Blood is avenged with
blood.” In an effort to end to this perpetual cycle of revenge, the Albanian
education ministry has set up programmes for children affected by blood
feuds. Each local authority tries to identify the children who do not attend
school because they are in hiding or confined to their homes. “It’s between
the families. If we go and ask for the police to help this thing will get
even worse.”

What the BBC conveniently “forgot” to mention in this article was that these
blood feuds are rooted in Islamic teachings. Two men were killed in a row
involving a group of second generation immigrants in Copenhagen, Denmark, in
2005. According to imam Abu Laban, who was later responsible for whipping up
hatred against his country of residence because of the now famous cartoons
of Muhammad in Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, the thirst for revenge
could be cooled if 200,000 kroner were paid by the family of the man who
fired the shots. 200,000 Danish kroner is approximately the value of 100
camels, a number based on the example of Muhammad himself. The idea of blood
money originates from the Koran, 2.178. Indemnity is secured through the
payment of blood money to the next-of-kin or the injured party, as opposed
to retaliation, in which the killer is put to death or has a like injury
inflicted on him/her. It depends upon what the family of the deceased or the
injured party wants.

Politiken, a left-leaning newspaper championing Multiculturalism in Denmark,
argued that the principle of blood money might be worth considering.
Luckily, they were met by an outcry from angry citizens. Apart from the
apparent 7th century time warp Muslims seemed stuck in, many commentators
missed out on the worst part of the blood money concept: The compensation to
be paid is not the same for all people. The only full members of the Islamic
community are Muslim men. All others have fewer rights, due to their
religion, sex or slave status. The rates for blood money mirror this
religious apartheid system, which is deeply ingrained in Islamic law. A
Saudi Arabian court ruled that the value of one woman’s life was equal to
that of one man’s leg.

A secret high-level UK police report concluded that Muslim officers were
more likely to become corrupt than white officers, with complaints of
misconduct and corruption against Muslim officers running 10 times higher
than against their colleagues. “Asian officers and in particular Pakistani
Muslim officers are under greater pressure from the family, the extended
family [...] and their community against that of their white colleagues to
engage in activity that might lead to misconduct or criminality.” The report
argued that British Pakistanis live in a cash culture in which “assisting
your extended family is considered a duty” and in an environment in which
large amounts of money are loaned between relatives and friends. It
recommended that Asian officers needed special anti-corruption training.
Only an extremely small percentage of the inhabitants of Pakistan, and many
other Muslim countries, actually pay taxes. If Pakistanis don’t even pay
taxes in Islamic Pakistan, why should they pay taxes to, or feel any loyalty
towards, infidel, Western states? The clan is everything, the state is an
enemy, a mentality people from these countries bring with them to the West,
along with the corruption and the tribal violence associated with it.

The massive concentration of Muslims in major European cities will have
dramatic consequences, some of which are already visible. If it is allowed
to continue, it will destroy the coherence of society that is necessary for
our democracies and our legal systems to work. Increased urban insecurity
means that the state is not able to guarantee the security of its citizens.
If ordinary citizens feel that the state is no longer able to guarantee the
safety of their loved ones, then perhaps native Europeans will create groups
and “clans” of their own, to counter the Muslim clans. The result will be a
re-tribalization of our countries. The downfall of the nation state, if it
happens, will be chaotic, painful and bloody. Can it still be avoided? Only
time will tell.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to