http://frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/Read.aspx?GUID=ECF8798C-A213-4ED4-986A
-A14409B79DA0
 
Holocaust Denial, Then and Now          
By
<file:///C:/Program%20Files/Common%20Files/Microsoft%20Shared/Stationery/aut
hors.aspx?Name=Dr. Paul Kengor> Dr. Paul Kengor
FrontPageMagazine.com | Thursday, September 27, 2007 

The U.S. visit of Iranian theocrat-despot Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has prompted
some strange statements from critics of the war in Iraq. Specifically, it is
confusing to hear that George W. Bush wrongly focused on removing Iraq's
Saddam Hussein when, say the critics, Iran's Ahmadinejad is the bigger
problem. As proof of the dangers of Ahmadinejad, these critics cite not only
the Iranian dictator's support of terror, pursuit of the bomb, and general
fanaticism-all of which Saddam was likewise guilty-but, most notably, his
raging anti-Semitism and rejection of the nation of Israel.

Well, if you fear Ahmadinejad because of his views on Jews, then there's no
reason why you wouldn't have feared Saddam just as much. In both word and
deed, Saddam was worse than Ahmadinejad. Saddam walked the walk in his
anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel. Long before Ahmadinejad was denying the
Holocaust, Saddam was calling for a new one, and in fact was firing up the
gas chamber.

This inherent hatred of Israel was part of Saddam's being. Saddam was bred a
genocidal racist. When the budding despot was an adolescent, the uncle who
served as his role model and surrogate father published a pamphlet titled,
"Three Whom God Should Not Have Created: Persians, Jews, and Flies." Saddam
lived that credo. Later, as a dictator in the late 1990s, he ramped up the
country's printing presses and reissued his uncle's pamphlet. It was
circulated in untold numbers throughout the nation.

It is no exaggeration to say that Saddam's hatred of Israel was of literal
Biblical proportions. From the start of his regime, he pursued the grandiose
goal of rebuilding the ancient Biblical city of Babylon. This fit with his
thinking of being the modern incarnation of Nebuchadnezzar, the most
important of the Chaldean or Neo-Babylonian kings, who ruled from 605 to 562
BC. In 597 and 586 Jerusalem was besieged and captured by Nebuchadnezzar;
the second time, the king destroyed the city and carried the Jews off into
their Babylonian captivity. Saddam hoped to do the same to the Jews of his
day.

In Babylonia, and most conspicuously in Babylon itself, Nebuchadnezzar
engaged in numerous extravagant building projects. Picking up the mantle
some 2,500 years later, Saddam embarked on a $200 million remake of the
ancient city. In this re-erected Babylon, every tenth brick (among the 60
million) was inscribed, "Babylon was rebuilt in the reign of Saddam
Hussein," as they had once carried Nebuchadnezzar's name. This was Saddam's
most precious project-his apotheosis, his crowning touch. He invited the
world to his spectacle when in the late 1980s he began hosting an
International Babylon Festival.

Given these openly anti-Semitic ambitions, it was not exactly reassuring
when Saddam in the early 1990s spoke publicly of "scorching half of
Israel"-a country he called "an evil entity"-with chemical gas. Israelis
feared that precisely that might be underway when, during the 1991 Gulf War,
Saddam began firing Scud missiles at Tel Aviv. Israel had done nothing to
provoke him, and in fact deliberately stayed out of the conflict out of fear
of giving Saddam what he was seeking: an Israeli retaliation that would
split the fragile Arab component of the Gulf War coalition. In a frightening
reminder of the Holocaust, Israelis donned gas masks and placed their babies
in special airtight cribs so they would not choke to death.

Saddam never gave up his hatred of Jews, nor his love of terrorism: In April
2002-almost exactly one year before he would flee from American tanks-Saddam
publicly upped the payment from $10,000 to $25,000 for the families of
Palestinian suicide bombers who blew themselves up in the service of killing
Israel's Jews.

Most significant, for two full decades Saddam relentlessly pursued WMDs with
as much unholy gusto as Ahmadinejad ever did, and with a full complement of
U.N. inspectors on hand to provide 24-7 surveillance inside his country.
Israel then, as it does today, rightly feared it was the ultimate target.

So, all of this begs the question: Why are we now being told that George W.
Bush was wrongly focused on Saddam's Iraq instead of Ahmadinejad's Iran? 

The question is all the more baffling given that this is a changed position
by liberals, a reversal from the Clinton years to the Bush years. They were
fully supportive of repeatedly bombing Saddam during the Clinton years.
Whatever the reasons for their switch-from political to psychological, from
logical to purely emotional-there is no denying that Saddam was just as bad,
if not worse, than Ahmadinejad.

Yes, yes, I know that the expected WMD stockpiles were not in Iraq when we
got there, for reasons still not clear. I know that we are in a mess in Iraq
right now. But a truly evil man named Saddam Hussein-arguably worse than the
current evil man in Iran-is out of power and guaranteed to never return.

We should be very grateful that he is gone-gone for good. It is amazing how
this wonderful recent development is barely even discussed-swept right under
the rug. Can just one Bush critic at least concede that this is something to
celebrate? Please? Just one?

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to