Good idea, Amis.
 
B
 

Amis and Post-9/11 Anti-Muslim Hysteria

Terry Eagleton, The Guardian

 

In an essay entitled "The Age of Horrorism" published last month, the
novelist Martin Amis advocated a deliberate program of harassing the Muslim
community in Britain. "The Muslim community," he wrote, "will have to suffer
until it gets its house in order. What sort of suffering? Not letting them
travel. Deportation - further down the road. Curtailing of freedoms.
Strip-searching people who look like they're from the Middle East or from
Pakistan ... Discriminatory stuff, until it hurts the whole community and
they start getting tough with their children..."

Amis was not recommending these tactics for criminals or suspects only. He
was proposing them as punitive measures against all Muslims, guilty or
innocent. The idea was that by hounding and humiliating them as a whole,
they would return home and teach their children to be obedient to the White
Man's law. There seems something mildly defective about this logic.

In fact, I wrote so in a new introduction to my book "Ideology: An
Introduction." The press last week resounded with the Amis-Eagleton row. But
why? Because there were vital political issues at stake here? Not in the
least. What caught the media's eye was the fact that Amis and I are members
of the same school of arts at Manchester University. It was the prospect of
a senior common room punch-up that set even the broadsheet press slavering.
The question of whether or not to insult a whole sector of the population
was instantly reduced to a departmental spat.

Even professor John Sutherland, who ought to know better, engaged in this
trivial pursuit in his Guardian blog. Was this, he implied, a deliberately
timed broadside by a crusty old Marxist to coincide with Amis' arrival at
Manchester as a professor of creative writing? No doubt some will insist
this is the unsavoury truth. In fact, I had no idea when I wrote the piece
that Amis was about to become my colleague, and it makes no difference
either way. The views he expressed are vile, and saying so was my only
point.

Sutherland is concerned that I may have got Amis into hot water. After my
intemperate diatribe, will Muslims and other minorities really want to
attend his Manchester classes? Or have I let him in (with malicious
forethought, perhaps) for a torrent of politically correct abuse?
Astonishingly, Sutherland seems not to consider that Amis may have let
himself in for such critical debate by writing what he did. The real crime
in the professor's view is to have drawn attention to Amis' words. Perhaps
it would have been healthier for liberal democracy to have hushed the thing
up, so that insensate student radicals do not swarm into Amis' classes on
Nabokov and string him up by his thumbs.

Sutherland even gently insinuates that one might be censured for such
uncollegial conduct. Perhaps forcible political disagreements with
colleagues should land you on the dean's carpet, like playground brawlers
before the beak. Would this include feminists objecting to sexist comments?
Or is it all right if they do so sotto voce?

I had imagined that liberals such as Sutherland were all for a free market
in ideas. So they are; it's just outright conflict that they find
distasteful. There is scarcely a word in Sutherland's piece about the
obnoxiousness of Amis' views. The same was true of the press reaction as a
whole. A Sunday Times profile of me attributed my wrath to a visceral,
punk-like obsession with clobbering others. Rebuking influential writers who
propose the strip-searching of innocent Muslims is just a kind of
personality kink.

If they cannot find a flaw in your reasoning, the great radical William
Hazlitt wrote, they will certainly find one in your reputation. In his usual
intellectually slovenly style, Rod Liddle accuses Marxists such as myself of
supporting "Islamism." Amis' panic-stricken reaction to 9/11 is part of a
wider hysteria that has swept over sections of the liberal left, one to
which creative writers seem particularly prone.

Suicide bombers must be stopped forcibly in their tracks to protect the
innocent. But there is something rather stomach-churning at the sight of
those such as Amis and his political allies, champions of a civilization
that for centuries has wreaked untold carnage throughout the world,
shrieking for illegal measures when they find themselves for the first time
on the sticky end of the same treatment.

Is there a media conspiracy against me? You bet there is. The Sunday Times
asked the Manchester University press office for a mugshot of me for its
profile, and we graciously obliged. The paper then used the photo to draw a
portrait that made me look a lot balder than I am. If that isn't cause for
litigation, I don't know what is.

- Terry Eagleton is John Edward Taylor professor of English literature at
Manchester University.

 

 <http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7
<http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=102373&d=11&m=10&y=2007>
&section=0&article=102373&d=11&m=10&y=2007> 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to