http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_articl
e_id=492804
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_artic
le_id=492804&in_page_id=1811> &in_page_id=1811
 
Maybe the next time the Greenweenies tell the Navy to turn off it's sonar,
the Navy will respond with whatever's Navy talk for F**k Off! 
 

The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise,
leaving military chiefs red-faced

By MATTHEW HICKLEY - More
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/dmsearch/overture.html?in_page_id=711&in_o
verture_ua=cat&in_start_number=0&in_restriction=byline&in_query=matthew%20hi
ckley&in_name=on&in_order_by=relevance+date> by this author > Last updated
at 00:13am on 10th November 2007 

 
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_artic
le_id=492804&in_page_id=1811#StartComments> Comments Comments (6) 

When the U.S. Navy deploys a battle fleet on exercises, it takes the
security of its aircraft carriers very seriously indeed. 

At least a dozen warships provide a physical guard while the technical
wizardry of the world's only military superpower offers an invisible shield
to detect and deter any intruders. 

That is the theory. Or, rather, was the theory. 

Scroll down for more ... 

 Song Class submarine
<http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_01/submarine_468x323.jpg> 

Uninvited guest: A Chinese Song Class submarine, like the one that sufaced
by the U.S.S. Kitty Hawk

American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese
submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to
the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on
board. 

By the time it surfaced the 160ft Song Class diesel-electric attack
submarine is understood to have sailed within viable range for launching
torpedoes or missiles at the carrier. 

According to senior Nato officials the incident caused consternation in the
U.S. Navy. 

The Americans had no idea China's fast-growing submarine fleet had reached
such a level of sophistication, or that it posed such a threat. 

One Nato figure said the effect was "as big a shock as the Russians
launching Sputnik" - a reference to the Soviet Union's first orbiting
satellite in 1957 which marked the start of the space age. 

The incident, which took place in the ocean between southern Japan and
Taiwan, is a major embarrassment for the Pentagon. 

Scroll down for more ... 

 Kitty Hawk
<http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/11_01/2submarine_468x396.jpg> 

Battle stations: The Kitty Hawk carries 4,500 personnel 

The lone Chinese vessel slipped past at least a dozen other American
warships which were supposed to protect the carrier from hostile aircraft or
submarines. 

And the rest of the costly defensive screen, which usually includes at least
two U.S. submarines, was also apparently unable to detect it. 

According to the Nato source, the encounter has forced a serious re-think of
American and Nato naval strategy as commanders reconsider the level of
threat from potentially hostile Chinese submarines. 

It also led to tense diplomatic exchanges, with shaken American diplomats
demanding to know why the submarine was "shadowing" the U.S. fleet while
Beijing pleaded ignorance and dismissed the affair as coincidence. 

Analysts believe Beijing was sending a message to America and the West
demonstrating its rapidly-growing military capability to threaten foreign
powers which try to interfere in its "backyard". 

The People's Liberation Army Navy's submarine fleet includes at least two
nuclear-missile launching vessels. 

Its 13 Song Class submarines are extremely quiet and difficult to detect
when running on electric motors. 

Commodore Stephen Saunders, editor of Jane's Fighting Ships, and a former
Royal Navy anti-submarine specialist, said the U.S. had paid relatively
little attention to this form of warfare since the end of the Cold War. 

He said: "It was certainly a wake-up call for the Americans. 

"It would tie in with what we see the Chinese trying to do, which appears to
be to deter the Americans from interfering or operating in their backyard,
particularly in relation to Taiwan." 

In January China carried a successful missile test, shooting down a
satellite in orbit for the first time. 

 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to