http://www.nypost.com/seven/11132007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/a_forgotten_
war_700971.htm
 

A 'FORGOTTEN' WAR


AS IRAQ IMPROVES, COVERAGE DRIES UP

by Ralph Peters

 November 13, 2007 -- LAST weekend's news coverage of our veterans was
welcome, but deceptive. The "mainstream media" honored aging heroes and
noted the debt we owe to today's wounded warriors - but deftly avoided
in-depth coverage from Iraq. Why? Because things are going annoyingly well. 

All those reporters, editors and producers who predicted - longed for - an
American defeat have moved on to more pressing strategic issues, such as
O.J.'s latest shenanigans. 

Oh, if you turned to the inner pages of the "leading" newspapers, you found
grudging mention of the fact that roadside-bomb attacks are down by half and
indirect-fire attacks by three-quarters while the number of suicide bombings
has plummeted. 

Far fewer Iraqi civilians are dying at the hands of extremists. U.S. and
Coalition casualty rates have fallen dramatically. The situation has changed
so unmistakably and so swiftly that we should be reading proud headlines
daily. 

Where are they? Is it really so painful for all those war-porno journos to
accept that our military - and the Iraqis - may have turned the situation
around? Shouldn't we read and see and hear a bit of praise for today's
soldiers and the progress they're making? 

The media's new trick is to concentrate coverage on our wounded, mouthing
platitudes while using military amputees as props to suggest that, no matter
what happens in Iraq, everything's still a disaster. 

God knows, I sympathize with - and respect - those who've sacrificed life or
limb in our country's service. I just hate to see them used as political
tools. 

How many of you really believe that those perfectly coiffed reporters care
about our soldiers and their families? Does anyone think those news anchors
will invite any Marines in wheelchairs home for Thanksgiving? 

Still, for the 100-proof nastiness of the intelligentsia, you have to move
to the "entertainment" world. Hollywood declines to make a single movie
about any of our Medal of Honor winners in Iraq - but has deluged us with
left-wing diatribes, as activist actors and directors parade by with their
limp bayonets fixed. 

"Stars" who enjoy incredible privileges that our troops will never
experience treat us to vicious propaganda - such flicks as "In The Valley Of
Elah," "Rendition" and the released-on-Veterans'-Day-weekend (gee, thanks)
"Lions For Lambs." 

And then there's the forthcoming "Redacted," which wants us to grasp that
our psychopathic military's basic skills are the rape and murder of innocent
civilians. 

Immeasurably self-important, Hollywood tells itself these movies are acts of
courage. 

In some of the films, the victims - of their own leaders - are our troops.
In others, the victims are innocent Muslims falsely linked to terrorism. But
the unifying thread is that the only heroes are stay-at-homes who bravely
fight for the truth. 

A number of critics have noted that the American people refuse to pay an
hour's wages to see these films. Last weekend's release, "Lions For Lambs,"
earned less than $7 million, despite starring Tom Cruise, Robert Redford and
Meryl "America's in Peril" Streep. And that was the big-bucks earner so far.


Scriptwriters, directors and vanity-project actors (how many have been to
Iraq?) scratch their heads and deplore our apathy. They fail to grasp what's
truly happening: We, the citizens and moviegoers, simply reject these films'
underlying message. 

Because the real message of all of these in-the-toilet flicks isn't just
that the war in Iraq or the struggle against Islamist terrorists is bad -
it's that America is evil. At best, we're the moral equivalent of our
enemies. 

You know down in your guts that isn't true. I know it isn't true. But the
Reese Witherspoons and Tommy Lee Joneses, the Charlize Therons and Robert
Redfords have a clearer perspective from Malibu and Sundance than we do:
America not only isn't worth defending; we're a danger to all humanity. Our
troops are the semi-literate tools of the powerful. 

Well, the names on the marquees come and go, but our troops are always there
for us. In good times and bad, those in uniform see us through. And, yes,
our troops are defending the right of wealthy fools to make goofball
propaganda films insulting them. 

Now listen to what a real soldier (no makeup, no script), the assistant
division commander of the U.S. Army's 1st Cavalry Division in Baghdad, had
to say about the changes on the ground in Iraq during an internal
end-of-tour interview: "As we've changed the environment for the Iraqis, the
Iraqis are the bigger part of the solution now - and I don't mean the
security forces [but] the population." 

Brig.-Gen. Vincent Brooks stressed that the citizens have learned that
"extremists of any ilk" are the real threat: "They've tasted what happens
when those elements are sidelined. They long for the glory days of Baghdad,
they really do." 

An impressive soldier and a man of conscience, Brooks acknowledged to his
staff that the months ahead "will be difficult." Success "will be challenged
for indigenous reasons and, frankly, for external reasons, by those who
don't want to see Iraq be stable and prosperous." 

But the general stressed his belief that "the Iraqi people can do this."
That's Hollywood's nightmare. And the "mainstream" media's. 

Ralph Peters' latest book is "Wars of Blood and Faith." 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to