Terrorism definition needed,
says UAE
James Reinl, United Nations Correspondent

    * Last Updated: September 06. 2008 11:37PM UAE / September 6. 2008
7:37PM GMT

UNITED NATIONS // The UAE declared its commitment to tackling terrorism
during a UN debate on bolstering global co-operation but believes that
international efforts are being hampered by a failure to determine its
legal definition.

A two-day General Assembly forum concluded on Friday with the adoption
of a counter-terrorism resolution, but the world body's 192 members
remained deeply divided over what constitutes terrorism.

Despite years of discussion, there is no internationally accepted
definition of terrorism, partly because of the long-standing dispute
between Israelis and Palestinians.

What Israel describes as terrorist attacks are seen by many in the
Muslim world as the legitimate response of an occupied population to its
oppressor. In this analysis, Israel is seen to perpetrate what has
controversially been termed "state-sponsored terrorism".

During the debate, the UAE, together with other Muslim nations, raised
the right of occupied populations to fight oppression, as well as
arguing against associating Islam with terrorism.

Anwar al Barout, chargé d'affaires of the UAE mission to the UN,
said: "The UAE is convinced that terrorism is one of the greatest
challenges of the 21st century, and reiterates its commitment to
implementing the UN counter-terrorism strategy."

Speaking only days before the seventh anniversary of the September 11
attacks on New York and Washington, Mr Barout said the UAE had passed
federal laws that served to "criminalise illegitimate activities
related to terrorism".

As well as legislation to tackle cyber crime and freeze the assets of
terrorist suspects, the Emirates was stepping up the battle against the
illegal trafficking of guns and drugs.

"The UAE has introduced legislation and conducted educational
initiatives to ensure all possible measures were taken against
extremism, including through co-operation with Interpol," he said.

But the diplomat warned that the global fight against terrorism was
"running into difficulties".

Mr Barout said: "There is no legal definition of terrorism that
would distinguish between the rights of peoples to fight against
aggression in occupation and terrorism per se." He also endorsed
concerns expressed by many delegates from the Muslim world that
terrorism had become associated in the minds of many people with Islam.

"We underscore again that it is impossible to link terrorism to any
religion or civilisation or specific ethnic group, thereby undermining,
jeopardising or instigating the undermining of religions and leading to
xenophobia."

The UAE's position was echoed by delegates from other Arab League
and Organisation of the Islamic Conference governments, with some
highlighting the lack of consensus on "state-sponsored
terrorism", which they argued was perpetrated by Israel.

Daniel Carmon, an Israeli diplomat, reiterated his government's
position on attacks carried out by militants, saying his country had
been "challenged from terrorism from its very beginning".

"Israelis and Israeli interests have been the target of terrorist
attacks abroad, along our borders to the north and south, and in the
very heart of the country," he told delegates at UN headquarters in
Manhattan.

Disagreements over the definition of terrorism have long hindered
co-ordination efforts, with the General Assembly adopting the UN Global
Counter-Terrorism Strategy in Sept 2006 only after a year of fractious
negotiations.

The strategy focuses on addressing conditions that give rise to
terrorism, improving states' abilities to fight the problem and
ensuring that human rights and the rule of law are observed.

According to Srgjan Kerim, president of the General Assembly, the
strategy has improved global co-operation on intelligence-sharing,
technical assistance and training and helped tighten border controls and
banking systems.

Mr Kerim said that by reaffirming the UN's adoption of the
counter-terrorism strategy, members had "risen above political
differences" and taken "collective and practical action on a
daunting and politically sensitive" issue.

Robert Orr, chairman of the Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force,
said UN members had put aside their differences in order to co-operate
on the genuine threats posed by terrorists.

"We would love to see that definition tomorrow if all member states
could agree on it," said Mr Orr. "But the point has been that
member states themselves decided to... adopt a strategy and proceed even
before a definition was adopted."

Mr Orr added that there were already 13 UN conventions defining specific
terrorist acts, such as hijacking, hostage-taking and bombing.

"It is not like the lack of a definition means that there is a
Hobbesian free-flow," he said. "A definition is important, but
there is already a large body of international law out there."
http://www.thenational.ae/article/20080906/NATIONAL/617214813/-1/ART
<http://www.thenational.ae/article/20080906/NATIONAL/617214813/-1/ART>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to