Please find below an example of UPI's continuing coverage of the U.S. 
intelligence agencies and the Obama transition, published Monday. I hope you 
find it interesting. You may link to it on the Web here:

HYPERLINK 
http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2009/01/12/Can_Obamas_outsider_pick_to_head_CIA_succeed/UPI-17231231812114/
 
http://www.upi.com/Emerging_Threats/2009/01/12/Can_Obamas_outsider_pick_to_head_CIA_succeed/UPI-17231231812114/

Please note that this story remains the copyright property of UPI. If you want 
more information about UPI products and services, please contact me or e-mail 
[email protected]. To stop receiving these alerts, just reply with the word 
"unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Shaun Waterman
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor
E-mail: [email protected]
Tel: 202 898 8081

Can Obama's outsider pick to head CIA succeed?
By SHAUN WATERMAN
UPI Homeland and National Security Editor

WASHINGTON, Jan. 12 (UPI) -- Intelligence outsiders like Leon Panetta, 
President-elect Barack Obama's pick to be director of central intelligence, 
have a mixed record at heading the agency, serving and former officials say. 

"There was a desire to make a clean break with the policies of the Bush 
administration. ... They had to bring someone in from the outside," said one 
senior aide at the Senate Intelligence Committee who asked for anonymity to 
discuss a nominee seeking confirmation from the panel.

John Brennan, a former senior CIA counter-terrorism official who originally was 
being considered for the post, ruled himself out after a storm of protest from 
some Obama supporters occasioned by his tenure at the agency during a time when 
it used interrogation techniques like water-boarding -- simulated drowning -- 
that critics label torture.

"They allowed the bloggers to dictate that they couldn't appoint anyone" who 
had served at the agency during the Bush administration, said a former senior 
CIA official. The former official called the pick "pretty good … given the hand 
they dealt themselves."

"If you rule out anyone who had been there in the last eight years," the former 
official continued, "you limit the universe of people" from which you can 
choose.

He said that, at 70 years old, Panetta was likely "not thinking about his next 
job" after heading the agency -- an important qualification. "If you stay there 
(as director) for any length of time -- well, let's just say you don't make 
many new friends."

Nonetheless, the former official said, choosing an outsider was "not ideal."

Even those who support the pick acknowledge that Panetta -- as someone who has 
not had access to current intelligence for many years -- will have, in the 
words of the Senate Intelligence Committee aide, "a very steep learning curve."

"He'll have to get up to speed very quickly on the hot spots (like 
Afghanistan-Pakistan, North Korea and Iran) -- who is who and who is doing what 
… how we are collecting against those targets," said the aide.

In addition to the substantive aspects of the job, the new director, if 
confirmed, will have to swiftly learn his way around the agency, familiarizing 
himself with the way it is organized and how it operates on a day-to-day level.

"The value of an insider is that they know how things run and what questions to 
ask," said a senior U.S. national security official who asked for anonymity 
because he is not authorized to speak to the media.

"In any agency," the Senate aide said, "the career bureaucrats know 
everything," and this can make things difficult for an outsider, especially if 
he does not enjoy their trust.

In this context, some observers say Panetta should move to reassure agency 
staff that he will support them, especially given concerns about possible 
investigations by the incoming administration into CIA practices like 
interrogation and rendition. 

These concerns have been stoked by the suggestions from some Democrats that the 
appointment of an outsider is designed in part, as Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., put 
it, "to usher in a new era of accountability" at the agency. 

In a statement issued last week, Wyden, a senior member of the Senate 
Intelligence Committee, added: "For too long our nation's intelligence 
community has operated under a policy of questionable effectiveness and 
legality. … I look forward to working with Mr. Panetta to declassify much of 
the story of what went wrong at the CIA these last eight years."

"People (at the CIA) don't know him. … There are a lot of unknowns," said the 
national security official.

"He will have to reassure the rank and file that he believes in them. … They 
need to be comforted," added the official, urging Panetta to hold a series of 
"all hands" meetings for staff and to arrange in short order a visit to the 
agency's headquarters by the president himself.

To help reassure CIA staff, Panetta also is being urged to keep intact the 
leadership team around outgoing Director Michael Hayden, including especially 
his deputy, Steven Kappes, a veteran spy popular at the agency who was brought 
back by Hayden after quitting following a clash with the previous director, 
former Rep. Porter Goss, R-Fla.

"I have very high regard for Steve Kappes," another Intelligence Committee 
member, Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., said in a statement. He added that he was 
"impressed by (Kappes') competency." 

"I hope we can convince both Mr. Panetta and Mr. Kappes to work together at the 
CIA," concluded Bayh.

The former CIA official said that even if Panetta were able to get up to speed 
and win the support of staff, he still would suffer from being an outsider.

"There's a unique culture" at the CIA, the former official said. "It takes a 
while to learn how to decipher what you are hearing and seeing."

"You wouldn't make someone commandant of the Marine Corps if they'd never been 
in the military," the former official concluded.

But the historical record appears more mixed than this observation would 
suggest. 

The man after whom the CIA headquarters building is now named, the first 
President George Bush, described himself as a "total outsider" to intelligence 
when he took over the agency.

"I viewed my job not to learn all the tradecraft, but to defend the quality and 
the character of the agency and the people there," Bush told Fox News Sunday. 
"That was perhaps an easier assignment than knowing all about every intrigue of 
intelligence."

George Tenet, though he had worked for the Senate Intelligence Committee and 
the National Security Council, had never served at the CIA when President Bill 
Clinton tapped him to head it. 

On the other hand, James Woolsey and John Deutch, the two other outsiders who 
headed the agency under Clinton -- and during Panetta's last stint in 
government -- are widely regarded as having much less successful tenures. 
Woolsey declined comment through an aide, and Deutch did not respond to a 
telephone message asking for an interview.

"All I hope," former President Bush said, "is that whoever goes out there goes 
with confidence in the CIA, and the people around CIA, they're good people." He 
said he had "great confidence" in Obama's pick. 


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database: 270.10.7/1893 - Release Date: 1/14/2009 6:59 
AM
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[email protected] 
    mailto:[email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to