http://tinyurl.com/3ymseew

 


ISNA on the FBI: Friend or Foe? 

 
<http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010071911069/homeland-security/isna-on-the-fb
i-friend-or-foe/print.html> Print

 


from IPT News    


Monday, 19 July 2010 19:34 

        

Never, ever talk to an FBI agent without a lawyer present. Even if it's over
a cup of tea.

FBI agents are sending informants into mosques on aimless hunts for
terrorist cases. Those informants will bait and entrap your members. But we
support law enforcement and want to be a partner with it.

Those seemingly contradictory messages dominated a session on law
enforcement relations, called "Free to Pray," at the Islamic Society of
North America (ISNA) convention in Chicago earlier this month. Though it was
organized by  <http://www.muslimadvocates.org/about/our_mission.html> Muslim
Advocates, a legal group, ISNA President Ingrid Mattson was a panelist.

"This isn't about the Muslim community against law enforcement or that we're
against law enforcement," Mattson said. "I mean, any of you who are
interested in joining any law enforcement agency whether it's police or FBI,
you should do that."

Moments earlier, Muslim Advocates Executive Director Farhana Khera focused
part of her remarks on Muslim community leaders - those often sought out by
law enforcement officials for community relations and outreach. They might
be using you, she warned, to get to members of your mosque:

"And sometimes these community members don't even think of themselves as a
source. You know that they just might think themselves - Well I have a good
relationship with the head of the FBI office; you know he comes by my office
from time to time and we have tea, or we go to lunch, and he just talks to
me about the community. But what may seem like an innocuous set of
conversations in the FBI's mind they may be thinking of you as an informant,
as a source. And the repercussions and the harm that that can cause can be
pretty serious."

Echoing Khera was Nura Muznavi, a Muslim Advocates staff attorney, who
warned that talking to the FBI without an attorney means "you're gonna be
spending a lot more resources trying to fix that mistake than if you had
gotten an attorney from the get-go."

ISNA may be the most influential Muslim American organization, with the
White House sending high-ranking emissaries to its past two conventions to
convey President Obama's well wishes. Its public message usually advocates
interfaith dialogue and government outreach.

In this session, however, law enforcement was cast as hostile to Muslim
Americans.

The attorneys vaguely described examples to prove their point, in which the
FBI used "agent provocateurs" to drum up a case, or in which an imam's
attempt to help ended in disaster. Upon examination, however, those few
examples cited don't hold water.

The FBI's unconstrained investigation into the Muslim community started
after 9/11, Khera said:

"Director [Robert] Mueller instructed every field office to actually go out
into their fields and count every mosque, every Muslim charity, cultivate
sources and informants, open investigations, and open and actually
prosecute."

As a result, people sitting beside them at their mosques might be an agent
provocateur sent there "to provoke and incite our fellow community members,"
Khera said. Muznavi accused the FBI of going on "law enforcement outreach"
or "fishing expeditions" in which FBI agents "are going to masjid leaders,
they're going to imams, and they're asking just for general information
about community members."

Muznavi cited the case of  <http://www.investigativeproject.org/case/288>
Ahmadullah Niazi in Irvine, California. A man started hanging out in Niazi's
mosque and was "going around to the young men at the masjid and talking
about jihad and talking about violence and just kind of trying to it seemed
like trying to stir up some trouble," she said. That prompted mosque leaders
to report the man - who turned out to be an informant - to the FBI.

Left unmentioned were Niazi's family ties to a man who was Osama bin Laden's
security coordinator and allegations that he concealed contact with the
relative. In addition, during a February 2009 bond hearing, FBI agent Thomas
Ropel III
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/1024/fact-checking-the-mosque-infiltrat
ion-kerfuffle> testified that Niazi was the one who instigated conversations
about conducting terrorist attacks and blowing up buildings, not the FBI
informant.

Niazi and another man did contact the FBI about the man who turned out to be
the informant. Ropel's testimony indicates the FBI viewed the move
dubiously. It came days after news reports highlighted the role an informant
played uncovering a plot to attack fuel lines at New York's at JFK Airport.

Khera also discussed the case of Imam
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/1058.pdf> Ahmed
Afzali, who tipped off New York subway bomb plotter
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/case/345> Najibullah Zazi that
investigators were asking about him. Khera defended Afzali, saying that the
imam thought he was doing his "civic duty" by helping "self-police" the
community. Afzali
<http://www.cnn.com/2010/CRIME/07/05/new.york.terror.probe/?hpt=T2> pleaded
guilty in March to lying to the FBI about tipping off Zazi, who tried to
flee from authorities after the imam's phone call. Zazi
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/documents/case_docs/1186.pdf> pleaded
guilty to conspiracy to provide material support to Al Qaeda and conspiracy
to use weapons of mass destruction against U.S. citizens in February.

During the session, Khera blamed the Muslim community's problems with the
FBI on new DOJ guidelines for domestic FBI operations, implemented in
December 2008:

"[The DOJ] issued formal guidance to FBI agents, to FBI field offices saying
- Go ahead, go undercover, develop informants, go into mosques, go into
other religious gatherings, community organizations, political gatherings,
and poke around. Poke around, talk to people, see what you can sniff out,
and you can also use what are called agent provocateurs, or informants, in
these settings."

A review of the  <http://www.ignet.gov/pande/standards/prgexhibitg1.pdf>
actual guidelines reveals this evaluation as myopic at best. While the
guidelines do allow more flexibility for FBI agents to conduct
investigations in the form of non-predicated "assessments," nothing in the
guidelines indicates that FBI agents can just "poke around" as the speakers
claimed. The stated purpose of an assessment is limited to detecting,
collecting information on, or preventing federal crimes and threats to the
national security, or collecting foreign intelligence.

Informants are authorized for use in assessments, but the guidelines specify
that using an informant in this case is still subject to strict regulations
as detailed in the  <http://www.ignet.gov/pande/standards/prgexhibith.pdf>
Attorney General's Guidelines Regarding the Use of FBI Confidential Human
Sources. Under these guidelines, an informant is not permitted to "initiate
or instigate a plan or strategy to commit a federal, state, or local
offense." An exception is given authorizing this type of activity only under
strict guidelines that show that show the benefits obtained from this
activity would outweigh the risks, for example, if it would prevent death or
serious bodily injury.

Muznavi reminded any "community leader[s]" in the audience that any
information provided can be used "for further surveillance and investigation
of your community." She concluded, "So you really don't want to be putting
yourself in a situation where you're providing anybody with information
about people in your community that the FBI now is gonna follow up and start
investigating those people."

Additionally, Muznavi criticized a group that voluntarily gave the FBI a
list of participants who
<http://www.investigativeproject.org/1768/when-a-radical-directs-anti-radica
lization> attended a seminar with failed Christmas Day airline bomber Umar
Farouk Abdulmutullab. "If you are a leader of an institution, you can't be
turning that information over to the FBI unless they have a subpoena, a
court subpoena, that says you have to," she said.

Last year, ISNA
<http://www.isna.net/articles/News/The-Use-of-Informants-to-Target-Mosque-Go
ers.aspx> opted out of signing on with an American Muslim coalition that
<http://www.americanmuslimtaskforce.net/pView222b.html?action=viewPDetails&p
ageId=11102&pCatName=%20&pGrpName=%20&pT=Community%20Relations> threatened
to cut off ties with the FBI, citing reports FBI informants had been
unfairly targeting mosques for investigation. ISNA agreed that the FBI
should look into the allegations, but said in a press release "that
communications with law enforcement agencies should remain open." The
statement added that the FBI has the responsibility of protecting all
citizens from terrorists and criminals and that, "all Americans have a moral
and legal obligation to ensure that the Bureau fulfills its mandate."

It is difficult to determine which message speaks for ISNA's true attitude.
People who may be the subject of an investigation are well served to have
counsel present during questioning. The ISNA convention panel cast everyone
as a potential suspect, though, without a genuine foundation. If the abuses
described in the convention panel were as rampant and threatening as
portrayed, there should be endless and clear-cut examples demonstrating it.
The few cited, however, ignore established facts that made law enforcement
action more than justifiable.

 <http://www.investigativeproject.org/about.php> The Investigative Project
on Terrorism (IPT) is a non-profit research group founded by Steven Emerson
in 1995. It is recognized as the world's most comprehensive data center on
radical Islamic terrorist groups. For more than a decade, the IPT has
investigated the operations, funding, activities and front groups of Islamic
terrorist and extremist groups in the United States and around the world. It
has become a principal source of critical evidence to a wide variety of
government offices and law enforcement agencies, as well as the U.S.
Congress and numerous public policy forums. Research carried out by the IPT
team has formed the basis for thousands of articles and television specials
on the subject of radical Islamic involvement in terrorism, and has even led
to successful government action against terrorists and financiers based in
the United States.  

 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to