Why Israel Must Eliminate the Iranian Threat

 

Paul Eidelberg

 

The multifaceted proposal outlined below is based on the assumption that
Israel has the air and naval platforms required to destroy Iran's nuclear
development program and cripple Syria and Hezbollah.  However, before being
overawed by the problematics and possible ramifications of an Israeli strike
on Iran, it must be stressed that Iran does not have to deploy nuclear
weapons to bring about the Israel's political demise.  Let it only be known
that Iran has one or more of such weapons and certain consequences will
naturally follow, namely:

 

1) Jewish immigration to Israel will dwindle.

 

2) Emigration of well-off Israelis, especially of professionals employable
abroad, will increase.

 

3) The Jewish birthrate in Israel will decrease.

 

4) The ratio of Jews to Arabs will decline.

 

5) The ratio of Jewish to Arab Knesset members will decline.

 

6) Economic investments in Israel will decrease as will Israel's GDP.

 

7) Scientific and technological progress will shrink.

 

8) Israel's military power vis-à-vis its enemies will decline.

 

9) Israel will cease being a strategic asset to the United States.

 

10) The country will be utterly demoralized.

 

That a successful Israeli strike against Iran's nuclear facilities would
only delay production of a nuclear bomb by two or three years is not an
argument against a strike.  During the interim the United States will very
likely have a new president who will pursue an aggressive policy toward
Iran.  But quite apart from this optimistic point, one intelligence analyst
has noted that Israel could target any Iranian efforts to recover.  It could
target Iran's petroleum industry which would deny Iran financial means to
rebuild its nuclear facilities. Also Iran's air force and air defense
networks and equipment would likely be significantly degraded as a result of
an Israeli strike.

 

Meanwhile, "regime change" may take place in Iran facilitated by overt and
covert actions by Israel and/or America.  Also, Israel may develop a
defensive nuclear shield that would neutralize Iran.

 

A strike against Iran would have to be followed immediately by Israeli
strikes against Syria and Hezbollah.

 

It would obviously be of enormous importance to target the leadership
echelons of Israel's enemies. 

 

Of course, the ramifications of this multifaceted proposal are enormous.
Israel will be denounced by the Obama administration, the United Nations,
and the European Union.  A U.S. arms embargo and economic sanctions will
very likely follow. 

 

However, Israel will retain the support of the American Congress and will be
cheered by the American people.  Indeed, a successful Israeli strike against
Iran would have a most a therapeutic impact on American society especially
on Evangelical Christians as well as on Catholics.  They will rally to
Israel's support and be encouraged to magnify their own efforts against the
atheism and hedonism spreading throughout the United States. 

 

A successful Israeli strike against Iran will incite imams in a thousand
mosques to vent their hatred not only of Jews but of Christian America, and
this will expose Islam, as 9/11 failed to do, as the enemy of civilization
so awesomely portrayed in this hyperlink:

 

< <http://www.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=0861ff3eabea1ceb73e4>
http://www.tangle.com/view_video.php?viewkey=0861ff3eabea1ceb73e4>

 

An existential crisis of world-historical significance is developing in
America.  Americans dare not remain silent or "politically correct" while
this fabricated religious threat to human freedom spreads across the land
(click >  <file:///D:\My%20Documents\Madison%20Avenue.doc> Madison
Avenue.doc).

 

A successful Israeli attack on Iran, the epicenter of global Jihad, will
stop Islamic triumphalism and inspire Americans to go on the offensive
against this imperialistic evil.  Another American Revolution beckons.  Is
it far-fetched to think that Israel will trigger this Revolution lest
America succumb, step-by-step, to the darkest of tyrannies?

 

 







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to