http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=9302

 

Justin Raimondo: An American Neo-Fascist By: Stephen
<http://97.74.65.51/bioAuthor.aspx?AUTHID=205>  Schwartz 
FrontPageMagazine.com | Tuesday, March 15, 2005


Dennis "Justin" Raimondo is a minor celebrity in the U.S., thanks to a
10-year career as an amateur demagogue in the libertarian milieu of the San
Francisco Bay Area, a political environment where anything goes and nothing
matters. He has the familiar personality traits of the type: "sentimental
formlessness, absence of disciplined thought, ignorance combined with gaudy
erudition."  He poses as a conservative but maintains a website at
antiwar.com, that features anti-American cranks like Noam Chomsky and is
hugely popular with the left - not surprisingly since it views America as an
incipient fascist state.  

 

Raimondo is a confused and confusing person, who seeks to be the master of
the confusion he creates. Born plain Dennis, he renamed himself Justin,
while attending the Cherry Lawn School, a defunct prep school in Darien,
Conn., which he graduated in 1970.    

 

Raimondo unquestionably encompasses many contradictions. Now past 50, he
features a photo of himself on his website with a cigarette dangling from
his mouth, in a fey (and failed) pose as an homme fatale. He is flamboyantly
gay, but promotes himself as a Buchananite conservative and was in fact
Buchanan's San Francisco campaign spokesman during the "culture war" that
other gays took personally, many elections ago. The entire package is
deceitful, and it is a calculated deceit.

 

The movement that Raimondo has cobbled out of opponents of the Iraq war, who
are drawn into his site, is unabashedly fascist. Justin Raimondo personifies
an American "red-brown" alliance, like the one that surfaced briefly in the
1930s when Communists and Nazis combined forces to bring down the Weimar
Republic. This alliance was revived after the fall of Russian Communism,
when Stalinists and fascists around the world united on an old platform -
war against the Jews - of which more will be said further on.

 

Raimondo's own understanding of fascism - a word he himself throws
carelessly around when defaming political enemies and disarming potential
critics -- is utterly superficial. In a preposterous column titled "A
Fascist America," (March 3, 2005), he defines fascism as follows:

 

1) "The idealization of the State as the embodiment of an all-powerful
national will or spirit; 

 

2) "The leader principle, which personifies the national will in the holder
of a political office (whether democratically elected or otherwise is
largely a matter of style); 

 

3) "The doctrine of militarism, which bases an entire legal and economic
system on war and preparations for war."

 

Of course. applied to America this is absurd. Outside the neo-Nazi fringe,
no Americans, least of all Republicans, idealize the state. The "leader
principle" is not only not in evidence, it is almost absent in a political
season when the President has been attacked more viciously than any chief
executive in memory; and it is pretty difficult to refer to American
"militarism" when the country's security rests on a military that is
voluntary and under attack. In the same column, while attempting to draw a
parallel between opponents of the anti-war crowd and fascists, Raimondo even
lends credibility to Hitler's fairy tale that the Nazi seizure of power was
a response to "the imminent danger of Communist revolution" - a particularly
absurd assertion since the Communists actively colluded with the Nazis in
their attacks on Weimar's democracy and passively supported Hitler's
accession to power. 

 

In an attempt to smear America even further (as if that would be possible)
Raimondo throws in Augusto Pinochet, the left's favourite example of an
American puppet. But Pinochet never idealized the Chilean state, or promoted
a cult of himself as a leader, or prepared for war or waged war against any
foreign country, as required by Raimondo's fascist model. Pinochet even
organized a democratic referendum that removed him from power. Indeed,
Pinochet was no more than a typical, short-term military dictator of a type
seen all over Latin America, bereft of charisma or serious ideology.  His
rise to power was the consequence of historical accidents, not of ideology
or mass mobilization, and he left behind a thriving democracy. 

 

Raimondo himself, on the other hand, has much in common with the true
historical type. He once sought notoriety as a leftist, but now poses as a
rightist, a pattern first set by Mussolini in 1915. Years ago Raimondo
attempted to become a Republican leader in San Francisco but was quickly
dumped after boring the small party group in that city with his pretensions
and diatribes.  He took over a new conservative tabloid in San Francisco and
soon put it out of business by turning every front page into a showcase for
headlines about himself.   

 

He has always wanted to be considered an author and journalist, no less than
a political figure. At about 13 or so, he seems to have imagined himself as
a science fictioneer.  But he never had the discipline or stamina to apply
himself to any profession aside from that of absurdist publicity hound.  He
has failed as a journalist and political commentator, exactly as Hitler
failed as a painter, as Mussolini failed as a socialist leader, and as the
most notorious fascist of the left, Fidel Castro, failed as a lawyer.  

 

Like his models, when Raimondo never engages intellectually with opponents,
but relies on invective, insults, and innuendo. Notwithstanding his bizarre
and vulnerable persona as a gay Buchananite, he glories in violating the
privacy of others.  He is obsessed with exposing neoconservatives as
"Trotskyites," a largely spurious claim, since the most famous example among
the original neoconservatives, Irving Kristol, was a Trotskyist for only a
year, nearly seventy years ago, and only a handful of recent ex-leftists -
almost entirely ex-Democrats - are leading neo-conservatives today.   

 

The psychological term for Raimondo's posturing is "projection."  He is
obsessed with rooting out alleged political, ideological, and even religious
chameleons, with the unconscious intent of advertising his own political
transvestism.  This pattern is evident in all his activities: he claims that
America is becoming a dictatorship, the better to justify his own ambitions
for power. He defends the establishment media against criticism by
conservative weblog authors, although without the rise of the "blogs" he
would be nothing. Until the launch of Buchanan's unreadable (and soon to be
defunct) American Conservative, his only place of publication was the
paleo-conservative Chronicles. 

 

Posing as a war-hater, Raimondo defends murderous dictators like Milosevic,
who unleashed the only wars in Europe over the past half century. He
presents the Ba'athist party-states in Iraq and Syria as victims of the
malicious West and openly wished that Japan had won the Second World War,
while fiercely alleging his patriotic motivations. When it comes to
America's present wars, he revels in a repellent defeatism. The heinous
attacks on America on 9/11 become for him an explanation of American
"fascism."

 

Taking a leaf from his comic-book canon of political wisdom, Raimondo
describes fascism as a product of "the traumatic humbling of a power once
considered mighty." He cites Germany defeated in the First World War, while
ignoring that Italy, where fascism originated, was a victor in that war, as
was the third Axis power, Japan. Perhaps this omission can be ascribed to
the fact that Raimondo idolizes Japan, which was at the height of its power
when it attacked Pearl Harbor.  As he wrote so eloquently, in an article
titled. "Hiroshima
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=6775>  Mon Amour:
<http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=6775>  Why
Americans Are Barbarians," posted to his site on August 8, 2001, "the idea
that America is, in any sense, a civilized country is easily dispelled."  By
contrast, imperialist Japan, which slaughtered millions in East Asia, is his
idea of paradise.  He believes "the wrong side won the war in the Pacific."
It is, by the way, extremely doubtful that Raimondo has ever set foot on
Japanese soil.   

 

The upshot of Raimondo's mishmash is his charge that September 11 was "an
enormous defeat for the U.S.," and thus the source of Bush fascism. Many
fascist movements have been expansionist and imperialist, but others were
historically known for their promotion of disaffection and demoralization,
such as those in France and England before the Second World War, and the
isolationist legion in America at the same time, which Raimondo seeks to
revive. The Rosetta Stone of his philosophy is Buchanan's idea of the
betrayed "American republic" - betrayed by democracy that is - an
ahistorical trope which echoes prior fascist movements. 

 

Classic fascism has other characteristics that resonate in Raimondo's
agendas.  He is a fanatical rumormonger, asserting that U.S. war plans
against Syria and Iran are nearly operational, while Bush administration
policies toward these states have been notably circumspect. He was among the
most active disseminators of the legend that an innocuous document, titled
"A Clean Break," having to do with Israeli foreign policy, was actually a
blueprint for the invasion of Iraq.

 

If, as Mary McCarthy said, every word written by the Stalinist Lillian
Hellman was a lie, including "and" and "the," Raimondo is a prevaricator
down to the placement of commas, periods, and semicolons.  One of his
favorite tricks is the mendacious use of hyperlinks, giving the impression
that his statements are backed by other sources. These are usually his own
articles, immodestly declared by him to be "classics," which in fact have
little or nothing to do with his latest ravings, but lead to more lies
through more links.  This, too, is not original with Raimondo; it is the
Chomsky method of meretricious citations. 

 

Raimondo calls Abraham Lincoln "the closest to a dictator that any American
president has ever come."  A couple of days later, forgetting or ignoring
that statement, he labels President Franklin Roosevelt the "predecessor" of
today's "fascism," and declares that Harry Truman and Winston Churchill were
also "fascist heroes."  At the same time, he tenaciously defends Milosevic -
a dictator who freed no slaves - and, equally insistently, denies the
occurrence of the 1995 massacre of Bosnian Muslims at Srebrenica.  He also
defames the Albanians, and encourages others on his site to do the same, and
then denies being an apologist for Serbian war crimes.  He has called the
Kosovars "the Shi'ites of Western Europe" - meaning, Muslim friends of
America, who deserve to be slaughtered.  He fervently hopes for a new war
between Slavic Macedonians and Albanians, since nothing warms his heart so
much as the thought of dead Albanians except, perhaps, the dead "Zionists"
buried in the Twin Towers on 9/11.  

 

Calumny is Raimondo's Socratic method.  He refers to David Frum and Richard
Perle, two intellectuals who have no governmental authority whatever, as
"strutting martinets." When I myself attempted to clarify the status of
Islam in Uzbekistan, an American ally, while criticizing obstacles to
democracy there, he labeled me a defender of torture.  He accused me of
"rationalizing the same sort of regime in the U.S." as in Uzbekistan -
based, according to him, on "torturing dissidents, shutting out all
political opposition, and arresting thousands on account of their political
and religious convictions."

 

In his latest ridiculous column, "The Specter of Fascism," dated March 9,
the Raimondian style of revisionist history is in full display.  In a single
paragraph, he refers to the leftist New York tabloid PM, published in the
late 1930s and 1940s, as "Communist Party-controlled," which will certainly
come as a surprise to Arnold Beichman, a long-serving anti-Communist and
former leading editor of the paper.  PM was famous as a battleground where
Stalinists and anti-Stalinists fought for influence, but was never under
Communist control.  For one thing, unlike the real Communist press, such as
the Daily Worker, PM did not promote an "antiwar" alliance, during the
Stalin-Hitler pact, with the Nazis, of the kind Raimondo wishes to revive
today - which is why PM, a newspaper that went out of business in 1948,
still provokes Raimondista rage.   Raimondo refers to PM's identification of
pre-1941 isolationists as a "fifth column," which Dennis shrieks was
"scurrilous and untrue."   He's wrong.  Calling the pro-Axis rabble in
America then a "fifth column" was accurate reporting, just as it is accurate
reporting to describe Dennis Raimondo as a sympathizer of America's enemies
now.

 

Sometimes Raimondo posts other leftwing fascists to do his slandering for
him.   He has done this with Kevin Keating, infamous for hoisting a banner
during the anti-Iraq demonstrations in San Francisco that read: "We Support
Our Troops When They Shoot Their Officers." If a critic of Saudi Arabia's
support for Wahhabism enters his sights, he will accuse them of fomenting
war against the Kingdom.  He has, in fact, insisted that the
neo-conservatives in the government are actually preparing military action
against the Saudis. Raimondo's protective attitudes towards the Saudis
derive perhaps from the fact he and the Saudi princes share a commitment to
the fable of "Zionist" involvement in 9/11.

 

For Raimondo, the Great Satan is America, and the Little Satan is Israel.
He has written a screed called The Terror Enigma, that is a kind of
Protocols of the Elders of Zion for the War on Terror. Raimondo's tract -
it's only a pamphlet issued by a vanity press - insinuates, with no serious
evidence, that the Israeli government had prior knowledge of 9/11 but failed
to warn our authorities; that because an Israeli lived in the same
neighborhood as a 9/11 conspirator they were naturally complicit; Israelis
selling art on the streets of the U.S. were actually big-time spies engaged
in undermining our government; that here, there, and everywhere, the
omnipotent Israelis control everything, so why not the attack on the Twin
Towers as well? The next step from this conspiracy logic is, of course, the
claim that Israel was in on 9/11 with the Bush administration.  

 

On October 29, 2004 Raimondo wrote a piece under the headline, "Bush and
Kerry put Israel first." It claimed that, "the Jewish state keeps an entire
people captive in the twin concentration camps of Gaza and the West Bank;"
and "the Israelis love to torture and berate [Yasir Arafat] far too much to
let him die a natural death." Referring to the Protocols of the Elders of
Zion, he wrote, "one needn't refer to fiction when the relevant facts are so
readily available." (In other words, the Protocols may be fake, but they
tell the truth.) According to Raimondo, "Today, the word 'fascist' is the
political equivalent of the 'f'-word, rendered virtually meaningless on
account of its degeneration into pure epithet. Yet, Israel in its present
trajectory fits the classic definition of fascism."   And: "Israel, far from
being our faithful ally, is potentially an enemy."

 

Almost as intense as his hatred for the Jewish state is Raimondo's loathing
of democracy. Some may have been taken aback by the volume of his bile when
he denounced the "orange revolution" in Ukraine as well as the current
democratizing efforts in Lebanon. But not those who have followed Raimondo's
prominent association with the Russian Jew-baiting website, Pravda.ru, and
its American contributor, the neo-Nazi Bill White.  

 

Bill White has followed the predictable career of neo-Nazi agitators.  He is
a Jew-hater and a compulsive liar, frequently inventing "facts" about those
he targets.  Posing as a "libertarian socialist" with a site at
www.overthrow.com, he recently distinguished himself by hailing the murder
of the family of the judge in Chicago who had the temerity to order payment
of a fine by a neo-Nazi leader. The Roanoke Times reported on March 3, "As
authorities investigate the killings of a federal judge's family in Chicago,
a Roanoke white supremacist on Wednesday applauded the murders as justified
violence against Jews and the federal government.  'I don't feel bad that
Judge [Joan Humphrey] Lefkow's family was murdered,' William A. White,
editor of The Libertarian Socialist News, wrote in an essay Tuesday on his
Web site, Overthrow.com. 'In fact, when I heard the story I laughed. 'Good
for them!' was my first thought.'"

 

While sorting out the love affair between antiwar.com and overthrow.com is
akin to diving into a sewer, Dennis Raimondo and Bill White were eager
contributors to the Pravda.ru site until the "patriotic" admirers of both
bridled at their association with a journalistic enterprise associated, in
the mind of most Americans, with old-fashioned Communist propaganda.
Articles by both Raimondo and White have been widely recirculated by the
Saudi-funded Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).   In the
"red-brown" logic, Jew-baiting works equally well for fascists, Communists,
and Islamo-fascists.  

 

Raimondo's website consistently published propaganda generated by Randall
(Ismail) Royer, a former CAIR employee now doing a 20-year federal sentence
for terrorist activities. Recently, one of Royer's associates, Ahmad Omar
Abu Ali, was charged with plotting to assassinate President Bush in
collaboration with al-Qaida. Before his arrest, Royer distinguished himself
between with a campaign to harass and intimidate critics of the jihadists -
myself, and the Saudi dissident Ali al-Ahmed among them - in the Washington
region. Raimondo gleefully recycled Royer's Jew-baiting rants on his
website. CAIR, which employed Royer, joined in the campaign by
redistributing the Raimondo screeds.  CAIR - which pretends to be an
anti-defamation organization - also disseminates the neo-Nazi propaganda of
Bill White.    

 

CAIR poses as a civil liberties advocate, Raimondo poses as "antiwar," White
poses as a "libertarian socialist," and their comrade-in-arms Kevin Keating
poses as a "revolutionary." The technique is familiar to any history
student:  the Nazi party called itself the socialist party of the German
workers, while plotting to suppress the labor movement and enslave
wage-earners. 

 

The law recognizes that some conspiracies are real:  one such is the common
effort of Raimondo, CAIR, Royer, Abu Ali, White, Keating, and others to
silence the critics of Islamist extremism and intimidate the supporters of
America's leadership in the global war on terror. Of that leadership,
Raimondo has written, "Go F*ck Yourself, Mr. President."  (November 26,
2003).

 

Raimondo has taken on the role of a pre-1941 Axis agent in America, lashing
the Jews, giving comfort to the country's worst enemies, defaming the
president, and, in general, seeking to undermine faith in democracy. He also
craves martyrdom, and dreams that he will be arrested and tried for sedition
the way some of his heroes were.  He is so reckless in his provocations that
he may some day get his wish. Raimondo is a prophet of disintegration and
ruin. Whether he achieves his martyrdom or not, he has certainly earned a
minor footnote in the history of  "extraordinary popular delusions."   If,
as he claims, a "specter of fascism" is present in America today, Raimondo
can best locate it with a mirror.

  _____  

Stephen Schwartz, an author and journalist, is author of The Two Faces of
Islam: The House of Sa'ud from Tradition to Terror. A vociferous critic of
Wahhabism, Schwartz is a frequent contributor to National Review, The Weekly
Standard, and other publications. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to