http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/71294

CNSNews.com

Nearly Half of United States Considering Arizona-Style Immigration Legislation
Thursday, August 19, 2010
By Fred Lucas, Staff Writer 





(CNSNews.com) – Twenty-two states are now in the process of drafting or seeking 
to pass legislation similar to Arizona’s law against illegal immigration. This 
is occurring despite the fact that the Obama administration has filed a lawsuit 
against the Arizona law and a federal judge has ruled against portions of that 
law – a ruling that is now being appealed.
 
Next month, two Rhode Island state lawmakers, a Democrat and a Republican, will 
travel to Arizona to speak with Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, local sheriffs, and 
other officials about how to better craft their own bipartisan immigration bill 
for Rhode Island, which already has been enforcing some federal immigration 
laws. 
 
Meanwhile, 11 Republican state lawmakers from Colorado traveled to Arizona this 
week to meet with officials there on how to craft legislation for the Mile High 
state. 
 
In addition, Alabama House Republicans announced this week that they would seek 
to “push an illegal immigration bill similar to the recently approved Arizona 
law.” This law would “create a new criminal trespass statute that allows local 
law enforcement to arrest illegal immigrants for simply setting foot in 
Alabama,” said Alabama’s House Minority Leader Mike Hubbard. 
 
In Florida, proposed legislation against illegal immigration has been retooled 
to address some concerns raised by a federal judge who blocked the proposed 
bill, though it would still allow Florida state police to enforce immigration 
law. 
 
In all, there are 22 states considering copycat legislation from the Arizona 
law against illegal immigration, according to the Americans for Legal 
Immigration Political Action <http://www.alipac.us/>  Committee (ALIPAC), a 
group that advocates for stricter immigration enforcement.

  <http://media.cnsnews.com/resources/70174.jpg> 
These illegal immigrants, deported to Mexico on Wednesday, July 28, 2010, are 
shown near the Nogales Port of Entry in Sonora, Mexico. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)

Arizona’s law mirrors federal law. It requires local law enforcement officers 
during a lawful stop to determine the immigration status of an individual by 
asking the person to show identification that residents are already required to 
carry by law; and it authorizes law enforcement to securely transfer verified 
illegal aliens to federal custody. 
 
The law prohibits racial profiling and gives state residents the right to sue 
local agencies for not complying with the state law.
 
In the lawsuit challenging the Arizona law, the Obama administration said the 
United States should not have a “patchwork” of 50 different immigration laws. 
In late July, U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton ruled against most of the major 
elements of the Arizona law, halting their implementation.  That ruling is now 
in the appeals process. 
 
“We do not expand on federal law,” Florida state Rep. William Snyder, the 
sponsor of the bill in his state, told CNSNews.com. “We do not change 
penalties. The goal is not to create a new immigration framework at the state 
level.”
 
Snyder, the chairman of the Florida House Criminal Justice Committee, said his 
staff attorneys have taken the decision by U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton 
into consideration in re-crafting their bill for the next state legislative 
session. 
 
Snyder said the office of state Attorney General Bill McCollum has reviewed the 
legislation, as have committee attorneys, and they believe it will withstand a 
potential legal challenge from the Obama administration. 
 
McCollum, a GOP candidate for governor, supports the legislation. However, Gov. 
Charlie Crist, a Republican-turned-Independent candidate for U.S. Senate, 
opposes the proposal. 

  <http://media.cnsnews.com/resources/70306.jpg> 
Alfredo Salas, 28, shows his license Thursday shortly after being pulled over 
and let off with a warning for a cracked windshield by the Maricopa County 
Sheriff's Office during a crime and immigration sweep. (AP Photo/Amanda Lee 
Myers)

“We will continue to work with the language,” Snyder said. 
 
In Rhode Island, a bill that was introduced late in the session last year, and 
thus never reached a vote, is expected to be reintroduced in the 2011 session. 
Its two lead co-sponsors hope to have a bipartisan bill that will withstand a 
legal challenge after they meet with Arizona officials. 
 
“It exactly mirrors the Arizona law,” Rhode Island state Rep. Peter Palumbo, a 
Democrat, told CNSNews.com. “We will tweak the bill.”
 
Palumbo will be going to Arizona with Rhode Island state Rep. Joseph Trillo, a 
Republican. 
 
Their legislation would essentially codify an existing executive order signed 
in 2008 by Gov. Donald Carcieri, a Republican, mandating immigration checks on 
all new state workers and ordering state police to assist federal immigration 
officials.
 
This is Carcieri’s final year in office, so Palumbo said it is important to put 
the force of law behind what has already been Rhode Island policy. State 
troopers report illegal immigrants they encounter for speeding and other 
offenses to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) office.
 
Because of the executive order in 2008, corruption was discovered in the 
Department of Motor Vehicles, with drivers licenses being sold to illegal 
aliens, Palumbo said. <http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65245>  
 
In New Jersey, state Rep. Allison Little McHose, a Republican, introduced a 
series of proposals that focused primarily on requiring employers to verify the 
legality of workers, and preventing state benefits from going to illegal 
aliens. 
 
“New Jersey continues to be a sanctuary state for illegals because they know 
they can come to the state and receive many free benefits, like medical care,” 
McHose said in a statement. “The benefits may be free for those receiving them, 
but not the rest of the public because these costs are borne by the taxpayers.”
 
Other states with proposals that mirror the Arizona law are Arkansas, Idaho, 
Indiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, North 
Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and 
Utah.
 
“We are very pleased to announce 22 states are now following Arizona’s lead to 
pass versions of a law that has the support of 60 percent to 81 percent of 
Americans according to polls,” said ALIPAC President William Gheen in a 
statement. “State and federal candidates are rushing to display their support 
for Arizona’s law and immigration enforcement. We will not stop until all 
American states are protected from this invasion as mandated by the 
Constitution of the United States.”





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to