http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/china/20101107.aspx
<http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/china/20101107.aspx>
The           Lesson

November 7,         2010: China keeps hammering         away at the U.S.
over recent         sales of $6 billion worth of weapons to Taiwan.
While Chinese         diplomacy and         threats delayed the sales a
few years, the deal eventually went         through. China is still
trying to stop it, and calls the         sale a major obstacle to good
relations between the U.S.         and China.         The eventual
absorption of Taiwan         is a bigger deal in China         than it
is in the United States,         which annoys the Chinese, who see
themselves simply being         brushed aside by an         imperious
United States.         At least that's how it's played in the Chinese
government         controlled press.

Meanwhile,         the free press in Japan is         playing the
nationalist card as well, and the Chinese don't like         that. But
China has caused the problem by prompting and         allowing popular
(nationalist) demonstrations against Japan. Now         the        
Japanese are angry, and the media in Japan has picked up on        
that. The         Chinese leadership is upset with this development.
That's         because the Japanese         military is smaller, but
much more professional and effective,         than their         Chinese
counterparts. Plus, if this hate race keeps going, it         could lead
to Japan building         nuclear weapons. This prospect frequently
comes up in the         Japanese media, and         Japanese politicians
freely admit to how possible this would be.

The         Chinese hate/hate relationship         goes back a long way.
For centuries, China         basically ignored Japan, and        
considered them some violent malcontents living uneasily        
together on some         islands way out in the Eastern Ocean. The only
serious         attempt to conquer Japan was         carried out by
Mongols, who were slowly swallowing most of         China. The        
Mongols failed to take Japan         (and couldn't hang onto China).
The Chinese considered anything involving Japan to be a sideshow        
of little         consequence. But then, in the mid-19th century, the
Japanese         decided to join         the west, at least economically
and militarily. China was having         a hard time         adjusting
to the military, technical and economic superiority of         the West.
Not         so the Japanese.

For most         of the last few thousand         years, China had been
more powerful than the West, but too far         away for that to
make much difference. But now the Westerners had developed new        
ship designs         that allowed them to move large forces to East
Asia. China was         humbled in         several small wars. The
westerners, unlike the Mongols, had no         interest in        
conquering China, they just wanted some trade deals, and no        
interference from         China. But a suddenly modernized Japan, 130
years ago, began to         threaten, and         then defeat, China
with its new, Western style
<http://www.strategypage.com/qnd/china/20101107.aspx>  military. Until
1945, China could only         slow         down, but not stop the
Japanese. It took Western armies (mainly         from the U.S.,        
Russia and Britain) to finally crush the Japanese menace. China        
resents that as         well, and the mediocre performance of Chinese
forces in Korea         (1950-53), on the         Russian border (the
1970s) and against Vietnam (1979) has not         helped. The only
victory was against India in 1962, but that was a high altitude        
skirmish in the         mountains on the Tibetan border. Nice, but not
indicative of a         trend. Chinese         military capabilities
appear to have gone downhill since then

The U.S.         and Japan are being more         public about their
joint military planning against potential         Chinese military
moves in the region. China has made claims on disputed islands        
in the region,         bringing it into direct conflict with powerful
neighbors like         South Korea,         Japan, Taiwan and Vietnam.
Three of these nations are treaty         allies of the         United
States, which has 70,000 troops stationed in the region.         Then
there's         India, being threatened by China, which still claims the
Tibetan         border lands         (now part of India) that caused the
1962 skirmish. The only         major neighbor         China makes nice
to is Russia, which is also the only neighbor         with enough
nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles to cripple China. The        
lesson is not lost         on the rest of China's nervous neighbors.

October         29, 2010: A Japanese         destroyer successfully used
its Aegis anti-missile system to         intercept a         ballistic
missile. This is the third successful attempt out of         four for
the         Japanese fleet. Aegis has been 83 percent successful in
shooting         down ballistic         missiles. The U.S. fleet has 18
Aegis ships equipped with         anti-missile         missiles, while
Japan has six. There are 92 cruisers and         destroyers worldwide
equipped with the Aegis radar/missile system. Most just carry        
the anti-aircraft         version. While Japan has bought Aegis for
defense against North         Korean         missiles, Chinese missiles
can be shot down as well.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to