http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/35298

 


Trumping up the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama


The unraveling of Barry Soetoro, a/k/a Barack Hussein Obama II


 
<http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fcanadafreepress.com%2Find
ex.php%2Farticle%2F35298&t=The%20unraveling%20of%20Barry%20Soetoro%2C%20a%2F
k%2Fa%20Barack%20Hussein%20Obama%20II&src=sp> Share15 |
<http://www.addthis.com/bookmark.php?v=250&username=xa-4d529beb02c4728d>
Bookmark and Share| (1)
<http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/site/comments/the-unraveling-of-ba
rry-soetoro-a-k-a-barack-hussein-obama-ii/> Comments | Subscribe
<http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/CFP-subscriptions/>  | Print friendly
<http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/print-friendly/35298>  | Contact Us
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=Dear%20Canada%20Free%20Press> 

 - Doug Hagmann & Joseph Hagmann   Friday, April 8, 2011 

imageTo those who are now speaking out about the Obama eligibility matter, I
can think of no better statement than the one uttered by a very frustrated
Officer John McClane, played by Bruce Willis in the movie“Die Hard.” In
order to get the attention of a police officer oblivious to the carnage
taking place inside of the Nakatomi Plaza building after making a very
cursory inspection and finding nothing amiss,McClane tosses the body of a
terrorist <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qkyskI13KOs>  from an office
window window onto the windshield of the police cruiser and fires at the
police car, yelling “welcome to the party, pal.” 

        

I suspect that this statement accurately reflects the sentiment of numerous
individuals and groups who have been fighting in the real world trenches for
full disclosure of all of Barack Hussein Obama’s records, including his
birth certificate, for the last three years. People such as Commander
Charles Kerchner <http://www.protectourliberty.org/>  (retired) and Attorney
Mario Apuzzo <http://www.puzo1.blogspot.com/> , Pennsylvania Attorney Philip
Berg <http://obamacrimes.com/> ,  Reverend David Manning
<http://atlahmedianetwork.org/>  of Atlah Ministries,  and numerous others
who have spoken out and taken their valiant fight for full disclosure of
Obama’s records to the nation’s courts, only to be struck down for lack of
standing or other arbitrary judicial opinions.

Due to the recent public statements by billionaire businessman turned
reality television star about the birth certificate issue, the eligibility
of Barack Hussein Obama has gained equal amounts of renewed interest and
contempt by the American media and a vocal segment of the American public.
The latter display of contempt is nicely displayed by some recent interview
clips, including the priceless Meredith Viera interview of Donald Trump
<http://entertainment.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=28147497919897
8>  where she can hardly hold back her disdain of Mr. Trump and the entire
eligibility matter, and Donald Trump
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwVlDxhqrtw> ’s appearance on “The View”
last month.

On “The View,” Mr. Trump wreaked havoc among the cadre of women co-hosts
when he merely mentioned the lack of a legitimate birth certificate provided
by Obama. Lacking any coherent or intellectual rebuttals to Trump’s claims,
a not-so veiled accusation of racism was leveled against Trump by “The View”
co-host Whoppi Goldberg, while Barbara Walters expressed discomfort with the
matter by simply wanting to change the topic.


“Welcome to the party, pal”


During the last three years, there have been numerous individuals, authors,
investigative journalists, and others (and I consider myself among them) who
have been mocked, ridiculed, belittled or ignored by Obama supporters, the
liberal media, and the political left for even suggesting that this issue
has any merit whatsoever.

Perhaps even worse, conservatives on the right, including some high profile
media personalities, have joined with the left in the same vitriolic
ridicule of us so-called “Birthers,” a pejorative term ascribed to those who
are merely asking for yet-unfurnished proof that Barack Hussein Obama is
constitutionally eligible to occupy the office of the President of the
United States.

It has been only after Donald Trump began to ask the same questions others
have been asking for the last three years that the matter appears to have
morphed from a fringe topic into legitimacy. For example, Rush Limbaugh, who
has kept this topic at arm’s length, has taken delight
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0JZrA9K7Ec>  of the Viera interview,
although it’s difficult to discern whether Mr. Limbaugh is more delighted at
Mr. Trump’s steam roller approach and Viera’s reaction, or that the issue is
being finally exposed in such an unlikely venue. Because Mr. Limbaugh has
the ear of millions every day, I tend to gravitate to the former.

To those who are now beginning to pick up the topic because of the exposure
by Donald Trump, I can only say “welcome to the party, pal.”

With all due respect to Donald Trump, he has not “legitimized” the
eligibility issue, as the matter far exceeds the existence of the birth
certificate and has adversely affected the lives of many patriotic Americans
who have long fought for full disclosure of all of Obama’s records.
Promising to be the “most transparent” president in history,  Barack Hussein
Obama is the most deliberately opaque president who has withheld many more
records than his birth certificate. Not only has he withheld his records, he
has fought to keep them hidden from public view, amassing legal fees that
some claim to exceed a million dollars of his own money, and perhaps twice
that amount if pro-bono and other legal work is counted.

Also as a result of his refusal to disclose his records, a respected
military physician is presently serving time in Leavenworth for refusing to
obey deployment orders until he was satisfied that the orders he was given
were constitutionally legal. LTC. Terry Lakin
<http://homelandsecurityus.com/archives/4342> , an honored veteran with 18
unblemished and distinguished years of service, lost his legal battle and
remains behind bars as Obama’s first political prisoner in the war for
truth. While many may question the methods and venue in which LTC Lakin
chose to take up his battle, no one can question his motives.


“The biggest scam ever”


Both Messrs Trump and Limbaugh have stated that if Obama is determined to be
ineligible to hold office, it is the “biggest scam ever” perpetrated.
Indeed, and that statement itself might be an understatement.

I urge those reading this and those who are pursuing the truth to avoid
“battlefield myopia” and not merely cling to the existence or lack thereof
of the long form, authenticated birth certificate. The issue is much greater
than the birth certificate or where Obama was physically born, as he could
have been born in the Lincoln bedroom during the Kennedy administration and
still be ineligible to hold the office of president under Article II,
Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution. Our founders
determined that future presidents must be born to two parents who are both
U.S. citizens. Clearly then, the place of Obama’s birth is merely one
concern, while the citizen aspect of his parents remains another.

But the scam goes much deeper. Reviewing only the admissions of Barack
Obama, we are told that Obama was born to U.S. citizen Stanley Ann Dunham,
legally adopted by a foreign national named Lolo Soetoro, had taken the name
Barry SOETORO, and was given Indonesian citizenship. He was raised as a
Muslim in Indonesia, and attended a school there that accepted all faiths.
At one point, Barry SOETORO moved to Hawaii to reside with his grandparents
after Lolo SOETORO and Stanley Ann DUNHAM divorced. Obama completed high
school as Barry SOETORO Much is missing from his early years, including a
legal name change from Barry SOETORO to Barack Hussein Obama II. Absent of
any document to show the legal process of a name change within the U.S., it
is likely that the man sitting in the Oval Office is, in fact, Barry
SOETORO.

The above would also serve to explain the discrepancies with his social
security number and region of issuance, a matter we are very familiar with
in our capacity as licensed investigators. The reasons we have seen
published concerning the allegations of the association of multiple social
security numbers with Barry SOETORO and Barack Hussein OBAMA has always
bothered us, but not necessarily for the reasons often published. After
careful and extensive analysis, it appears that many of the numbers and name
variations associated with Obama are what we would describe as “database
chaff.” It is not uncommon for database repositories to erroneously
associate different numbers, addresses and sometimes names to an individual.
The reasons for this are many and beyond the scope of this article, but it
happens.

Accordingly, an investigator is well advised not to take the information
obtained from a proprietary database at face value without first analyzing
the information, tossing out the chaff and concentrating on the rest, which
we have done. Additionally, we have found and concur with others on this
matter that the social security number associated with Obama that was issued
from the SSA region in Connecticut is troublesome, but again, not
necessarily for the reasons as publicly stated by others.

As we have been investigating this matter for some time (see our
investigative report 1
<http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/PDF/ROIbho20100427a.pdf>  and report 2
<http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/PDF/OpartII.pdf>  in PDF format for
important background information), it has become apparent that at some
point, the individual known as Barry SOETORO began using the name Barack
Hussein Obama II. Based on our investigative findings, it was at about this
same time period that the Connecticut issuance of the social security number
appeared and became “attached” to the name Barack Hussein Obama. It can then
be reasonably reconciled that Barry SOETORO became Barack Hussein Obama
while he was a young man in New York following his mysterious trip to
Pakistan on a passport that was likely not issued by the U.S.


Trump’s curious statements


As long-time investigators dealing with large corporations, we have the
distinct advantage of knowing other professionals in the industry. Although
we have had no contact with Mr. Trump’s investigators nor are we connected
in any manner to Mr. Trump’s organization, team or efforts, we are aware of
the identity of at least one who is actively working on the Obama birth
certificate mystery. We are also familiar with that investigator’s
associates and their areas of inquiry, so we have a fairly good
understanding of what is taking place behind the scenes - and there is
plenty taking place behind the scenes.

NOTE: We will be talking about this in depth on the upcoming episode of CFP
Radio’s “The Hagmann  <http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio> & Hagmann
Report” on 8-10pm EST, Saturday, 9 April 2011. Program details follow this
report.

In advance of that show, however, we should address two rather curious
statements made by Mr. Trump during one recent interview. When talking about
his investigators in Hawaii who are looking into Obama’s birth certificate
issue, he stated that “you wouldn’t believe what they’re finding.” Mr. Trump
also stated that in his experience on Wall Street, he is familiar with
frauds of all types, and has seen some very sophisticated frauds over the
years. Well, we do have a very good idea of what is being found or verified
as having been scrubbed from the records.

In our investigation, we found that the scrubbing and altering of records
pertaining to Obama began well before he became an Illinois state senator in
the 1996 election cycle. The “scrubbing” or alteration of records did not
begin or end with Obama, but also extended to his mother and other
associates as well. In fact, a very large and extremely relevant part of the
investigation of Barry SOETORO, or Barack Hussein Obama II as he is known,
revolves around his parents, step father, and grandparents. and extends from
the U.S. mainland to Hawaii and other points across the globe.


Meteoric rise to power was well planned


To understand how a virtually unknown politician from Illinois could rise to
occupy the most powerful position in the free world in less than a decade
after he became a state senator, one must take a few steps backward to
understand the complete picture, and that Obama was selected long before he
was elected to become president. Problems with his background were numerous,
however, including but not limited to his parental lineage and place of
birth. These problems became apparent through a private vetting process by
his own handlers, or those who are known as the “power elite” in the latter
half of the last century. His handlers were and are globalists of the
highest order, extending from George Soros to those above him on the
proverbial pyramid capstone of globalists.

The globalists had direct and indirect ties to the Dunham family and in
particular, Obama’s mother. Consider, for example, that Peter F. Geithner
(father of Obama’s Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner), worked for the Ford
Foundation and oversaw the work of Obama
<http://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/2009/01/24/the-big-money-behind-tim-geith
ner-obamas-pick-for-secretary-of-the-treasury/> ’s mother, Ann Dunham,
while she was developing “microfinance programs” in Indonesia. In brief,
Obama’s mother set up a large loan system in Indonesia akin to the savings
and loan structure of the 1970s and 1980s. To gain a better understanding of
her activities in finance, despite her background in anthropology, recall
the BCCI scandal of the late 1970s. In fact, some of the same “players” who
existed then continue to exist in Obama’s circles.

Our investigation into her activities and those close to Obama are
continuing and will be the subject of a separate article, including how
Obama as president fits into the communist China agenda in terms of global
finance. Meanwhile, it’s important to take a few more steps backward in
history to understand that the scrubbing of inconvenient records is not new.


Fast Rewind: Senator Joe McCarthy & the relevance to today


The majority of Americans alive today do not recall the WW II postwar era
beyond the revised history contained in textbooks that rarely reflect the
truth of that time. Today’s well-coiffed but intellectually deficient
anchors who deliver the news to ordinary Americans know little to nothing of
the gritty reality of the origins of the “cold war” between the U.S. and the
former Soviet Union, and the infiltration of communist agents into American
government. It is that very infiltration that has paved the way for Obama.

Mention, however, the name of former Senator Joe McCarthy and watch as they
recoil in disgust, having been taught that the inquiries of Senator Joe
McCarthy is a black chapter in the history books of America. Since the 9/11
attacks, some of these news anchors and pundits have actually described the
vetting of Muslims for sensitive positions in the U.S. as a throwback to
“McCarthyism,” while few actually using that term know the true history of
communist infiltration in key government positions in the postwar era.

The truth is that communist infiltration of and through the U.S. government,
particularly the State Department, was and remains a legitimate threat to
America. A 106-page confidential memo dated 3 August 1946, written by State
Department official Samuel Klaus, detailed the alarming levels of communist
infiltration into American government. It was that memo that served as the
basis of Senator Joe McCarthy launching an investigation into the threat to
America from within. It was through the efforts of McCarthy that a Senate
subcommittee chaired by Senator Millard Tydings requested and eventually
received a copy of that memo. 

As noted by M. Stanton Evans, author of Blacklisted by History, that memo
would mysteriously vanish from our nation’s records. Mr. Evans notes that
this historic memo is not in the legislative panel file of the Tydings
panel, located in the National Archives of the U.S., and was also removed
from the files of Samuel Klaus, the author of the memo, from the National
Archives in March of 1993, nearly a half century after it was issued.

As painstakingly revealed by M. Stanton Evans in his extensive work
Blacklisted by History, important documentation well beyond the Klaus memo
relevant to exposing the level of communist infiltration into the U.S.
government is not limited to government sources such as the National
Archive, but also to private data sources and repositories. He lists a
number of instances where records were scrubbed and consequently, created a
much different and much less accurate picture of that era of U.S. history.

This topic is as relevant today as it was during the time of Senator Joe
McCarty, if not even more relevant. One only has to look at the reported
communist, Marxist and socialist ties in Obama’s lineage and inner circle to
understand the impact of missing records.

One would do well to use the voluminous work of M. Stanton Evans as a
template to understand how Americans have been deliberately misled by the
media and some members of our own government into believing that the
communist and socialist objectives, launched in the postwar era, have led to
where we find ourselves today.

The removal of the Klaus memo from his file in March of 1993 was as
deliberate as the refusal of government officials, complicit with the media
moguls of today to address the lack of bona fides of Barack Hussein Obama.
In fact, one could consider them an extension of the same.


What it all means


Based on investigative findings that are not discussed in the media, it
would appear that the selection and election of Barack Hussein Obama was
indeed the greatest scam ever pulled off against the American people. The
above provides just a small portion of the critical issues surrounding
Obama’s eligibility, identity and his place in U.S. and world history. The
story is much larger than a single piece of paper, but that paper, if
properly authenticated, will serve as the thread that will unravel the
larger tangled web of the Obama legend.

To those who have just awakened to the constitutional crisis we are facing
at the hands of this president, we’d like to say once again, “welcome to the
party, pal.”

Douglas J. Hagmann & his son, Joseph Hagmann, both investigators,
researchers and contributors to Canada Free Press, host a weekly radio
program on CFP Radio called The Hagmann
<http://www.blogtalkradio.com/cfp-radio> & Hagmann Report, broadcast live
every Saturday from 8:00-10:00 p.m. ET. In it’s fifth week, the program has
gained in popularity, and has become one of the ten most popular radio shows
on the BlogTalk Radio platform. This week’s program will be providing
additional details about the problems with Obama’s eligibility to occupy the
White House. 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to