Al Qaeda Capitalizing on 'Arab Spring' to Build Power and Shore Up

Weaknesses

 

By Judith Miller

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/04/08/al-qaeda-capitalizing-arab-spring-bu
ild-power-shore-weaknesses/print

 

Stunned by the secular Arab rebellions that have toppled some of the Middle
East <http://www.foxnews.com/topics/middle-east.htm#r_src=ramp> ’s most
enduring dictators, Al Qaeda
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/iraq/al-qaeda.htm#r_src=ramp>  and
other violent Muslim extremists are struggling to capitalize on the
upheavals that have reshaped the political map of the Middle East. 

While counterterrorism officials, scholars and analysts disagree about the
likely impact of the “Arab Spring” protests on efforts to combat terrorism,
many agree that Islamic jihadis face both enhanced peril and opportunities
in the coming months. 

Many also agree that eliminating the political vacuums the upheavals have
created is vital to preventing Al Qaeda, its affiliates, and those it
inspires from becoming more powerful. 

“The key ingredient is political stability in the region,” said Jean-Louis
Brugruiere, a leading French investigating judge charged with
counterterrorism efforts who now tracks jihadi financial operations for the
European Union. 

“The faster existing and new Middle Eastern governments fill political power
vacuums and restore stability,” he said in an interview on Wednesday, “the
less of a threat the violent Islamists will pose.” 

Initially, the breath, depth, and effectiveness of the protest movements
promoted largely by young, liberal, secular reformers seemed to shock Al
Qaeda into silence. 

Osama Bin Laden
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/iraq/osama-bin-laden.htm#r_src=ramp>
has issued no public statement or communiqués about the political protests
since their inception two months ago, said Jarret Brachman, a leading
counterterrorism analyst and the author of “Global Jihadism.” 

“At first, we heard almost nothing from senior Al Qaeda core figures. They
seemed to be reeling,” he said. Then last month, Ayman al-Zawahri, Bin
Laden’s deputy, issued an audio statement that was defensive and pleading in
tone, Brachman said. 

“He was almost pleading with Egyptians to embrace Islam and reject the
United States <http://www.foxnews.com/topics/u.s.htm#r_src=ramp>  and
democracy,” he added, and he also tried claiming credit for having ousted
President Hosni Mubarak
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/president-hosni-mubarak.htm#r_src=ra
mp>  by arguing that Washington was willing to abandon Mubarak because of
the Sept. 11 attacks. Brachman called the Zawahri message “unconvincing and
predicable.” 

A more upbeat spin on the upheavals came late last month from Anwar
al-Awlaki, the Yemeni-American cleric and top propagandist for Al Qaeda in
the Arabian Peninsula, or AQAP, which American counterterrorism officials
consider the most dangerous Al Qaeda affiliate. 

In a four-page essay in their online magazine “Inspire” titled, “The Tsunami
of Change,” Awlaki argued that the protests, by having broken the “barriers
of fear” and by ousting seemingly immutable dictators who protected
“American imperial interests” in the region, would work to Al Qaeda’s
longer-term political advantage. 

The dictators whom Al Qaeda most loathed and feared were now gone. The
ensuing wars and political turmoil in such states as Libya
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/libya.htm#r_src=ramp>  and Yemen
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/yemen.htm#r_src=ramp> , where Awlaki is said
to be hiding, would enable Al Qaeda militants to recruit, train and organize
in such open spaces, he wrote. 

That seems to be happening in some Arab states where political transitions
are under way or being contested. But experts caution that since each state
is so different, the militant Islamists’ prospects must be evaluated on a
case-by-case basis. Yemen is the state of most immediate concern. 

Fox News reported this week, citing a Yemeni official, that a group called
the Aden-Abyan Islamic Army had taken control of the historical capital of
Abyan, the main foothold for AQAP where American and Yemeni counterterrorism
activities have been focused. 

 
<http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/04/01/al-qaeda-gained-control-yemeni-town
-source-says/> Click here to read the story.

AQAP was said to have declared the province an “Islamic Emirate” that would
henceforth be governed by Islamic law. Also, AQAP and other Islamic
militants in the area were said to have surrounded a smaller military
company that had to withdraw because the Yemeni Army was unable to send them
reinforcements. 

Christopher Boucek, an expert on Islamic movements at the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace, in Washington, called President Ali Abdullah Saleh
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/president-ali-abdullah-saleh.htm#r_s
rc=ramp> ’s decision to reposition counterterrorism units fighting AQAP back
to the capital in Sana to protect his regime a major setback for U.S./Yemeni
counterterrorism efforts. 

So, too, he said in an interview, was the prospect not only of Saleh’s
ouster, which U.S. officials are said to now consider inevitable, but also
that of his son, nephews, and many of the counterterrorism officials with
whom Americans have been working to fight AQAP and other jihadis. 

“They’ll have to build all new relationships,” said Boucek. “Under-governed
space in Yemen is increasing by the day. Chatter among terrorists is
reportedly growing, and it’s about time for them to try to mount another
operation,” he said. 

Last winter, AQAP sent two sophisticated mail bombs in American cargo planes
that were intercepted and disarmed. Boucek is equally gloomy about
counterterrorism efforts throughout the region. 

“The Islamists are among the most patient and most disciplined of the
political players,” he said. “A couple of years down the road, victory will
go to the opposition that is the best organized.” 

In Egypt <http://www.foxnews.com/topics/world/egypt.htm#r_src=ramp> , he
said, “we focused on Tahrir Square and not on the back-street mosques. But
they are likely to be best at capitalizing on the political opening,” Boucek
asserted. 

Although the army, traditionally a bulwark of anti-Islamist fervor, is in
charge of the political transition in Egypt, attacks have recently increased
on Christians and other minorities, allegedly conducted by
ultra-conservative “Salafis,” or Muslim militants focused on religion rather
than politics. 

Deposed President Hosni Mubarak permitted them to flourish as a
counter-weight to the equally conservative Muslim Brotherhood
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/muslim-brotherhood-opposition.htm#r_
src=ramp> , believed to be the largest and best organized Muslim opposition
group in the country. 

The Salafis have denied carrying out the attacks, but analysts say they have
become increasingly assertive in demanding that Egypt remain an “Islamic”
nation and in fighting efforts to reduce the role of Islam in the public
arena. 

Recently, Islamists cut off the ear of a Christian in the southern city of
Qana because he was said to have had a relationship with a Muslim woman,
which Muslim fundamentalists consider “haram,” or forbidden by the Koran.
Last week, according to IPT News, run by Islamic expert Steven Emerson, one
man was killed and eight others injured in the village of Kasr el-Bassil
when Salafists attacked the owner of a liquor store, which the most
observant Muslims also shun. 

In the city of Monufiya, Emerson reported, dozens of Salafis stormed the
house of a woman who was accused of being a prostitute. Her furniture was
reportedly burned in the street. In Libya, where NATO-backed rebels have
been battling the 40-year regime of leader Muammar al-Qaddafi
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/muammar-gaddafi.htm#r_src=ramp> ,
the situation is even more complex, with each side accusing the other of
ties to Islamic terrorists and radicals. 

According to Emerson and the Wall Street Journal, Libyan rebel leader
Abdel-hakim al-Hasidi has said that around two dozen of his troops had
fought American troops in Iraq
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/supplemental-spending.htm#r_src=ramp
> . But he called them “patriots and good Muslims,” not “terrorists.” So,
too, he insisted were members of Al Qaeda, since they had also “resisted
foreign invasion.” Nor is Al-Hasidi, an influential Islamic preacher who
spent five years at a training camp in eastern Afghanistan
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/afghanistan.htm#r_src=ramp> , the
only militant within rebel ranks. His field commander is Salah al-Barrani, a
former fighter from the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which was formed in
the 1990s by jihadis returning from Afghanistan and who continued fighting
the Qaddafi regime until a truce was arranged between them. 

Spokesmen for the Libyan rebel national transition council deny that these
militant Islamists play a leadership role in the rebellion. They are
supported by French activist Bernard-Henri Levy, among others, who helped
persuade French President Nicolas Sarkozy to recognize the rebels rather
than Qaddafi’s government in Tripoli. There was “no evidence,” Henri Levy
said this week, that Al Qaeda or militant Islamists had a “significant
presence” in rebel ranks. 

American military officials, too, have downplayed the Islamist threat from
the rebels, saying in recent testimony on Capitol Hill
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/capitol-hill.htm#r_src=ramp>  that
they detected only “flickers” of an Al Qaeda presence in eastern Libya where
the rebellion is based. 

In interviews, other intelligence officials maintained that Qaddafi’s regime
has long-standing connections to secular and Islamic terrorist groups that
continue to threaten western interests. One official who asked not to be
quoted said there was evidence that Qaddafi was paying Tuaregs, nomadic
Berbers who live in Libya and roam throughout North Africa, as mercenaries,
and that they were selling anti-aircraft missiles, machine guns and other
weapons to Al Qaeda. 

Much of the think-tank community in Washington seems divided between
optimists and pessimists over whether Al Qaeda and the most dogmatic Muslim
militants will ultimately benefit from the Arab upheavals. 

Pessimists believe that the protests and reform movements that have ousted
longstanding dictators who were nonetheless staunch American allies and
partners in counter-terrorism efforts are inevitably destined to be hijacked
by the more disciplined, ruthless Islamists, especially given the lack of
civil institutions, the rule of law, or culture of tolerance in so many
Arabs states. 

Others remain cautiously optimistic. 

James Dobbins, a former ambassador who runs the International Security and
Defense Policy Center at Rand, concedes that the upheavals will inevitably
disrupt some intelligence cooperation and links among security services in
the short run. But he argues that Al Qaeda and like-minded groups are likely
to be undermined by the political opening of autocratic states in which
political dissent was routinely crushed. 

“As peaceful and legal outlets for dissent and the pursuit of Islamic
programs open up,” he said, “it will diminish the perceived need to engage
in violent activity.” Polls show that support among Arabs for Al Qaeda and
such militants has been steadily declining for several years, he added.
Their popularity was likely to fall further, he said, “if you have a shot at
achieving your goals without violence.” 

While Washington and its allies had to remain vigilant about terrorist
threats, he said, there was reason to believe that the Arab Spring protests
would eventually work to Al Qaeda’s disadvantage.

“Their narrative has been utterly disrupted,” he said. “The dictators they
sought to replace have been ousted, and not by them or their violence.” 

While representative governments would most probably reflect the will of a
majority of their citizens for a more “Islamic” government, such policies
would not necessarily jeopardize good relations with Washington, he
asserted. 

“The most Islamist state in the Middle East is Saudi Arabia
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/saudi-arabia.htm#r_src=ramp> ,” said Dobbins,
“and they’ve been a strong ally of America’s.” 

But Saudi Arabia, the pessimists counter, is also the country of origin of
most of the 19 hijackers in the 9/11 attack. While many Israelis have
expressed concern about whether militant anti-Israeli Islamist forces would
be the ultimate beneficiaries of the Arab spring rebellions, Maj. Gen. Amos
Yadlin, who resigned late last year as head of Israelis military
intelligence, was also more optimistic than many of his peers. 

In a lecture last week at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, he
argued that “a democratic Middle East” was “good for Israel
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/israel.htm#r_src=ramp> .” 

“Democracies rarely go to war,” he said. Israel could not remain indifferent
to the values that had brought the Egyptian people to Tahrir Square -- a
desire for “freedom, justice, rule of law and democracy,” he added. 

“Even if, in the short run, it may be more dangerous,” he said, “in the long
run I believe it’s a very, very positive process that we should support.” 

A senior New York Police Department intelligence analyst pointed to at least
one short-term benefit of the upheavals: Home-grown Islamic radicals in
America, too, had been stunned and shaken by the protests and the loss of
what he called their “narrative of oppression.” 

Like their counterparts in the Middle East, he said, they have been
distracted and, for the moment, paralyzed by shock. 

“Like all of us,” the official said, “they’ve been glued to their TV sets.”

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
[email protected].
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
[email protected]

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: [email protected]
  Subscribe:    [email protected]
  Unsubscribe:  [email protected]


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to