http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9328/pub_detail.asp

 

April 25, 2011


Off With Their Heads: Islamic "Lawfare"


 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.93/author_detail.asp>
Edward Cline


Print This <javascript:%20printVersion()>  E-mail This
<javascript:%20emailVersion()>  



 <javascript:void(0);> http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/images/share.png


ShareThis <javascript:void(0);> 

 

Comments (0)
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/comments.asp?id=9328> 

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/imgLib/20110424_TennielQueen.jpg

 

“And who are these?” said the Queen, pointing to the three gardeners who
were lying round the rose-tree; for, you see, as they were lying on their
faces, and the pattern on their backs was the same as the rest of the pack,
she could not tell whether they were gardeners, or soldiers, or courtiers,
or three of her own children.

“How should I know!” said Alice, surprised at her own courage. “It’s no
business of mine.”

The Queen turned crimson with fury, and, after glaring at her for a moment
like a wild beast, began screaming, “Off with her head! Off with—”

“Nonsense!” said Alice, very loudly and decidedly, and the Queen was silent.

 

Lewis Carroll, for all his imagination, could not have imagined that he
would make some relevant points in Alice in Wonderland about speaking up
against those who would silence criticisms. 

Your freedom of speech, in America and abroad, is undergoing the same kind
of treatment that airline passengers now undergo at the literal hands of the
Transportation Security Administration (TSA). If nothing dangerous or
controversial or offensive is found on your person, you may go about your
business and board your flight. But if you complain, or give the TSA
employee a dirty look, you will be subjected to special groping, feel-ups,
and molestation just to show you who is boss. You may be ordered to wait in
a glass cage as punishment until someone is ready to subject you to more
invasive molestation. If you assault a legally sanctioned groper in
retaliation, you will be assailed by airport police, regardless of your
gender, arrested, handcuffed, gagged, and jailed. You should have known that
speaking, or freedom of speech, like flying, is a “
<http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/2010/11/tsa-chief-john-pistole-if-pas
sengers-donâ??t-undergo-naked-screens-or-gropings-they-donâ??t-have-a-right-
to-fly/> privilege.” That is what you have been told.

The parallels are appropriate. Your freedom of speech is held hostage until
you submit to censorship. Obviously a contradiction, but one not grasped or
recognized by the government, our courts, or civil rights advocates. Power
does not need to recognize reason. The Bill of Rights to the contrary
notwithstanding, the government and judicial stance on freedom of expression
is that it is a permission granted by government, by society, by “God,” by
anything but the right to protect yourself from initiated force. Frown at a
TSA cipher, and that will be seen as offensive and hostile. Frown at Islam,
and that will be interpreted as offensive, hurtful, bigoted, or hostile. 

Criticize communism in a communist country, and you will be jailed and
sentenced to slave labor. Criticize Nazism in Nazi Germany, and you will be
imprisoned and sent to a concentration camp. Criticize fascism in Putin’s
Russia, and you will die by a bullet in an elevator, in your car, in a
public park.
<http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/04/brit_veteran_imprisoned_for_ko.
html> Criticize Islam in Britain in any form, and you will be subjected to
due process, tried, fined, and jailed. In Britain, only Muslims may indulge
in “hate speech” without penalty or worrisome legal consequences. 

Criticize CAIR in the U.S., and you will learn what a ton of bricks feels
like when it falls on your head. Like Molly Norris, the makers of “South
Park,” like Salman Rushdie, you will either have a fatwa issued for your
death, or you will be harassed and/or sued by an organization with terrorist
ties.

Freedom of expression is being assailed, not only by our own government, but
by our safely entrenched enemy, prominently led by The Council on
American/Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other Islamic “civil rights”
organizations. This is not news, of course. In Europe, one must be careful
about what one says about Islam – such as Dutch politician
<http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/04/wilders-sharia-show-trial-to-continue-his
-move-to-dismiss-biased-judges-fails.html> Geert Wilders, who is being tried
in Amsterdam for “
<http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5heDVEYozTggw9H
EYhk2dhF6veskw?docId=6599629> hate speech” – and what one shows – such as
the Turkish-German model,
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1378455/Sila-Sahin-poses-Playboy-
Muslim-model-upsets-family-nude-cover.html> Sila Sahin, who posed
<http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/04/germany-i-wanted-to-be-free----muslim-mod
el-upsets-family-by-posing-nude-for-playboy-cover.html> semi-nude on the
cover of the German edition of Playboy as a statement of her freedom from
Islam. 

Sila Sahin discarded the
<http://www.islamist-watch.org/blog/2011/04/efforts-to-ban-the-burqa-go-well
-beyond-france> burqa, and to the delight of anyone who admires the female
body, some of her other attire, as well. Her family is scandalized. Their
“honor” has been besmirched. Off with her head.
<http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/cairâ??s-strong-arm-tactics-in-the-cradle-of-l
iberty/> Aaron Proctor, a writer for the Philadelphia edition of
Examiner.com, dared to mention in a column that CAIR is an unindicted party
of the Hamas-linked Holy Land Foundation, Hamas being an FBI-designated
terrorist organization. The Pennsylvania chapter of CAIR, upon reading that,
sharpened the blade of its scimitar and called its lawyers to prayer. Off
with his head.

And when one is censored, either by a government or by a ruinous lawsuit, or
when one thinks twice before saying anything critical about Islam or its
adherents, and says nothing, because the consequences would be too terrible,
one may as well have been beheaded. Because once that happens, one’s mind is
shackled, as well. Rendered useless. Speechless. As silent as Sidney
Carton’s head after the guillotine has lopped it off. 

There are ways to fight Islamic censorship (also known as “lawfare” and
“libel tourism”) in this country. But the way of the Freedom From Religion
Foundation is not the right way. This organization filed suit against
President Barack Obama for declaring a
<http://www.indianapolisrecorder.com/religion/article_a091ec32-66d9-11e0-a14
f-001cc4c03286.html> National Day of Prayer because the decree excluded
atheists. The court properly dismissed the suit because “a feeling of
alienation cannot suffice as injury.” No branch of government, and
particularly not the executive branch, has any business establishing or
promoting religion. It is a violation of the First Amendment. And that is
the argument that the FFR should have made central in its suit. If the suit
was a ploy to persuade the court that Muslims were doing exactly what the
FFR was doing, suing over “hurt feelings” or “alienation, and getting away
with it,” the ruse failed. A
<http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2011-04-15-prayer_court_14_ST_N.htm>
USA Today article reported:

 

"If anyone suffers injury ... that person is the president, who is not
complaining," ruled a three-judge panel of the Chicago-based 7th U.S.
Circuit Court of Appeals.

"Those who do not agree with a president's statement may speak in opposition
to it; they are not entitled to silence the speech of which they
disapprove," the court said.


But neither the president, nor the Senate, nor the House, nor any government
department or agency has any Constitutional business proclaiming any
religious observance, whether or not the observance is voluntary. Such a
proclamation sets a precedent, one to be followed by others. The president
is not entitled to that brand of free speech. 

On the other hand, Muslims disapprove of any criticism of Islam or Muslims
in any form – by word or by caricature – and have repeatedly sought
injunctions against anyone speaking freely about Islam and Muslims. And it
is fear of those expensive and entangling suits, and the risk of inviting
demonstrations and even violence, that have silenced most critics of Islam. 

Only the courageous will speak their minds and answer “Off with their
heads!” with a reaffirmation of their right to say what they think must be
said.

 

 <http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/> FamilySecurityMatters.org
Contributing Editor
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/authors/id.93/author_detail.asp.>
Edward Cline is the author of a number of novels, and his essays,
<http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.2749/pub_detail.asp>
books, reviews, and other nonfiction have appeared in a number of
high-profile periodicals.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to