http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703937104576302890747157756.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h#printMode

 

 The Wall Street Journal <http://s.wsj.net/img/wsj_print.gif> 

WONDER LAND

MAY 5, 2011


Eric Holder's bin Laden Moment 


The moment has come for Mr. Holder to end his investigation of the CIA's 
interrogators of terrorist detainees. 


ยท         By DANIEL HENNINGER


 

As the whole of America takes a bin Laden victory lap, let us pause to remember 
some of this celebrated event's most forgotten men: the Central Intelligence 
Agency officers who sit under the cloud of a criminal investigation begun in 
2009 by Attorney General Eric Holder into their interrogations of captured 
terrorists.

That's right, the Americans whose interrogation of al Qaeda operatives may have 
put in motion the death of this mass murderer may themselves face prosecution 
by the country they were trying to protect. 

It is time for the Holder CIA investigation to end. The death of bin Laden 10 
years after 9/11 makes the Holder investigation of the CIA interrogators 
politically, emotionally and morally moot. 

But it lives. 

  <http://m.wsj.net/video/20110504/050411henninger/050411henninger_512x288.jpg> 

The moment has come for Mr. Holder to end his investigation of the CIA's 
interrogators of terrorist detainees.


Podcast: Listen to the audio of Wonder Land here. 
<http://podcast.mktw.net/wsj/audio/20110504/pod-wsjhenninger050411/pod-wsjhenninger050411.mp3>
  


In August 2009, Attorney General Holder announced that he was extending the 
mandate of Assistant U.S. Attorney John Durham into the CIA's so-called 
"enhanced interrogation techniques" of terrorist detainees. Former Bush 
Attorney General Michael Mukasey had appointed Mr. Durham in 2008 as a special 
prosecutor to look into the CIA's destruction of videotapes made during 
interrogations of two al Qaeda operatives. That investigation ended without 
charges last November. 

Mr. Holder decided to push the Durham investigation into a second phase. "I 
have concluded," he said "that the information known to me warrants opening a 
preliminary review into whether federal laws were violated in connection with 
the interrogation of specific detainees at overseas locations." Mr. Holder 
wasn't free-lancing; both he and Barack Obama had called waterboarding 
"torture."

This week the Associated Press reported that the name of bin Laden's courier 
may have come from CIA interrogations of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Abu Faraj 
al-Libi, who received "harsh" interrogation at CIA prisons in Poland and 
Romania. On Tuesday, Mr. Holder said the information came from a "mosaic of 
sources." 

Incidentally, there will be no attempt here to establish whether CIA 
interrogations did or did not lead to the bin Laden courier, who led our 
commandos to a bedroom in Abbottabad. Just as there will be no attempt here to 
resolve the fastidious debate unfolding over whether the Navy Seals' shooting 
of an unarmed Osama bin Laden was "legal." We'll leave that to the endless 
grinding wheels of the law journals.

If Mr. Holder has evidence of an egregious crime, he should step forward and 
announce it. If not, he should use this moment to put an end to the Durham 
investigation. Mr. Durham is not an independent counsel, whose hallowed status 
makes attorneys general loath to interfere. He is a special prosecutor, 
appointed by the attorney general and under his authority. 

On June 18 last year, Mr. Holder said in a Washington speech that Mr. Durham 
was "close to the end of the time that he needs and will be making 
recommendations to me." But nothing has happened. Asked this week about the 
status of this investigation, a Justice Department spokesman for Mr. Durham, 
whose office is in Connecticut, said the project is "still ongoing." 

Ironically, the CIA's contribution to bin Laden's end may ensure that its 
people will remain under this cloud. With President Obama elated over the 
success of his call to take down bin Laden, his poll numbers rising and his 
re-election campaign insulated from charges of Democratic softness on national 
security, what are the chances that his attorney general would wash away all 
that by announcing his intention to indict the men whose work may have sent his 
boss into Abbottabad, guns blazing? It is zero. 

View Full Image

 wl0505 
<http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/ED-AN518A_wl050_D_20110504154932.jpg>
 

Associated Press 

Attorney General Holder should shut down his CIA investigation. 

Eric Holder has taken a lot of flak over his handling of various terror issues. 
The point here is not to put him in the dock over another but to hope he'll 
make a good call. Times change. In his statement Sunday, Mr. Obama described 10 
years of "heroic" work by "our counterterrorism professionals." But he also 
noted that the remarkable sense of national unity after 9/11 "has at times 
frayed." It might be truer to say it was our ever-ragged politics that frayed, 
not our people. 

President Obama will be at Ground Zero in Manhattan today to lay a wreath. This 
is the same Ground Zero that on Monday morning was surrounded by young people 
chanting "USA" and singing "God Bless America (land that I love)." Some have 
asked whether Monday's chanters, barely teenagers on 9/11, were too celebratory 
or were in bad taste. 

Was it too celebratory Monday when 35-year-old David Ortiz of the Boston Red 
Sox and the Dominican Republic stopped after hitting a home run to hug Army 
Ranger Sgt. Lucas Carr, who'd been leading the Boston crowd in "USA" chants? 
Mr. Ortiz said it was just about "love." That's right. Those outpourings were 
about love of something bigger in America than our frayed politics or even 
making "our values" a function of our legal procedures. 

After 9/11, when the fraying started, George W. Bush passed through a 
seven-year political minefield of media leaks and lawsuits over the Patriot 
Act, surveillance, renditions, Guantanamo and CIA interrogations. Now bin Laden 
is dead, and Barack Obama's got the credit. We're all fine with that, just as 
we're fine with people chanting "USA" over the dead terrorist who tried to kill 
us. Now how about letting those CIA interrogators come in from the cold and 
join the celebration?



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to