<http://www.nypost.com/> clip_image001Updated: Fri., May. 27, 2011, 3:23 AM
clip_image002

Laughing at the UN

By BENNY AVNI

Last Updated: 3:23 AM, May 27, 2011

Posted: 10:29 PM, May 26, 2011

Here's your multilateralism at work: Susan Rice, our UN ambassador and other
members of the United Nations Security Council went to Africa to celebrate
the coming peaceful independence of southern Sudan. 

Oops. Just as the ambassadors arrived, Gen. Omar al-Bashir decided to invade
Abyei -- an oil-rich, disputed city on the north-south border. The invasion
may renew the war and turn into yet another Sudanese genocide. 

Did Bashir -- the president who reluctantly let the south secede --
deliberately time the invasion to coincide with the visit? 

"There's no cause and effect," a Western European diplomat on the Security
Council told me. 

Huh? The most prominent international institution didn't even enter Bashir's
calculations as he planned this land grab? 

Then again, maybe Bashir calculated his move specifically to thumb his nose
at the Security Council. 

After all, why should he fear the vaunted "international community"? So far,
the only significant Security Council punishment for his genocidal deeds has
been to refer his case to the ineffective International Criminal Court --
which has issued a warrant for his arrest that nobody will ever act on. 

Here's a recap of how we got here, with the Security Council trapped like a
deer in Bashir's headlights: 

For decades, troops under the command of the northern, Islamic Sudanese
government fought southern, mainly non-Arab, Christians and animists seeking
independence from Khartoum. The war ended in January 2005, after the Bush
administration hashed out a peace agreement. 

That accord dictated a referendum in the south, which duly took place last
winter. As expected, southerners voted in droves to break away from the
north. Their state is scheduled to become independent in July. 

The Security Council and the Obama administration declared it all a huge
success for multilateralism as Bashir, under much pressure, said he'd let
the south go. 

But international diplomacy left one detail unresolved: Who gets Abyei? For
centuries, local southern farmers have battled northern nomadic herders in
that area, so the sides couldn't agree on who resides there and thus could
vote on independence. So Abyei's separate referendum got delayed, and the
area remains disputed. 

Now add oil to the mix. As it becomes independent, South Sudan stands to
control 75 percent of Sudan's petroleum production of nearly half a million
barrels a day. And the Abyei area is home to several more lucrative fields. 

All this was a perfect recipe for the Bashir Special. Just as his government
did last decade in Darfur, it's now sending nomadic tribes into Abyei --
bent on ethnically cleansing to create facts on the ground that will assure
northern control. 

And what are we doing? Nothing. 

Oh, we did issue tough statements: Khartoum's withdrawal from Abyei "ought
to be immediate, unconditional and complete," Rice announced on Twitter
yesterday. 

The South Sudanese president, Salva Kiir, said the north's latest invasion
shouldn't renew war. Instead, he asked international troops to prevent
bloodshed in Abyei. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon obliged by proposing to
reshuffle the 10,000 peacekeepers now stationed in southern Sudan. 

But while UN troops perform heroically at times, they also lack the
training, discipline, hardware or even legal mandate to match determined
foes like Bashir. And the recruitment of troops from around the world has
reached a ceiling. 

Let's face it: The UN is unequipped to stop genocide in Africa or anywhere
else. 

Nor is any Western country prepared to add Sudan to its military to-do list.
(Uncle Sam is already quite busy with Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Libya and
whatever crisis the Arab Spring springs on us next.) 

So we pretend we're doing something -- that is, we talk up the supposedly
miraculous powers of multilateralism. But this week's Security Council
fiasco shows how ineffective that is. 

And here's a question for those who claim we have a "responsibility to
protect" against war atrocities and genocide: Would world powers be more
responsive and effective in confronting tyranny if they didn't have
institutions like the UN to hide behind? 

Of course, with a White House enamored with multilateralism, we're unlikely
to find out anytime soon. As Rice proudly tweeted from Africa this week,
"New poll: Americans (85 percent) understand sharing burden of global
challenges."



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to