Obama Says No to Durban III -- But U.N. Racism Summit Still Has Too Many
Supporters

By  <http://www.foxnews.com/author/anne-bayefsky/index.html> Anne Bayefsky 

Published June 02, 2011

With
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/obama-administration/barack-obama.ht
m#r_src=ramp> President Obama's anti-Israel hostility becoming an increasing
liability for Democrats, the administration finally decided Wednesday to
pull out of the U.N.'s upcoming Israel-bashing extravaganza known as "Durban
III." Believe it or not, the notorious U.N. world summit on racism is coming
to New York City in September with the purpose of "commemorating" the
ten-year anniversary of the racist "anti-racism" conference held in Durban,
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/south-africa.htm#r_src=ramp> South Africa in
2001. 

Mr. Obama's latest lead-from-behind foreign policy move comes seven months
after Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government first declared "we
will not be part of this event, which commemorates an agenda that promotes
racism rather than combats it."

The decision appears to be a clear reaction to the negative political
fallout surrounding Mr. Obama's recent veiled attempt to shove indefensible
borders down  <http://www.foxnews.com/topics/israel.htm#r_src=ramp> Israel's
throat. 

During Obama's speech to the pro-Israel lobby group AIPAC on May 22, he
specifically referred to his decision not to attend the "Durban II" or
"Durban review conference," which was held in Geneva in 2009. But he made no
mention of  of U.S. participation in the 2011 Durban III event, though it
would have been an ideal audience for such an announcement had he already
reached a decision on it. 

In 2009 President Obama decided -- just 36 hours before the meeting began --
that there was something wrong with a conference on xenophobia and
intolerance headlined by Iranian President Ahmadinejad. 

It was a costly delay, which saved the U.N. from even more embarrassment, as
many other states would have acted in tandem with the
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/u.s.htm#r_src=ramp> United States and
boycotted Durban II with sufficient planning. 

Evidently, on May 22 the president still thought he could pull the same
dawdling stunt again.

But with Democrats scrambling to recover from the president's profound
alienation of large numbers of voters deeply sympathetic to Israel, the June
1 announcement was made and dressed up as a response to a letter "from
Democratic Sen.
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/politics/kirsten-gillibrand.htm#r_src=ramp>
Kirsten Gillibrand." The old letter from last December was actually signed
by 9 Democrats, 8 Republicans, and 1 independent, and post-dated a boycott
call of the racism summit made by Republican Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen in
November.

The better-late-than-never decision is not as simple, however, as it seems. 

First, the U.N. General Assembly is currently negotiating a resolution on
the "modalities" of Durban III. In plain English, there has been a difficult
and protracted debate behind-the-scenes about the organization of the
summit. The European Union, in particular, is looking for procedural dodges
that will help it avoid the split that occurred during Durban II, when some
EU states boycotted and others did not.Unfortunately for EU pencil-pushers,
there is no escaping that the substance of the meeting is irrevocably
poisoned. 

By virtue of a 2010 General Assembly resolution, the purpose of Durban III
is to celebrate a world conference that reveled in anti-semitism and to
adopt a final declaration that reaffirms the original Durban Declaration.
That's the Declaration supposedly to combat racism, xenophobia and related
intolerance but that somehow manages to charge just one of the 192 UN
members with racism, namely, Israel. 

The Obama administration has given no indication that it will encourage EU
allies to break ranks and boycott Durban III, by insisting on a vote on this
resolution and voting against.

Second, the U.N. Human Rights Council is poised to hold an event in Geneva
on June 15 also "in the context of the tenth anniversary of the Durban
Declaration." With the Obama administration on the Council it appears set to
attend events over there hoping nobody will notice over here. 

But the Council and U.N. High Commissioner Navi Pillay - a native of Durban
and chief champion of the Durban Declaration - have planned a three-hour
panel discussion featuring seven carefully-selected speakers. They include,
for instance, extremist Mireille Fanon-Mendes. As recently as April 25 of
this year, Fanon-Mendes told the "Electronic Intifada" that Israel was an
apartheid state and she supported the first and second Palestinian intifadas
as well as blockade-running flotillas and the international prosecution of
Israelis as war criminals.

The Durban illness runs deep. The U.N. human rights system, led by the High
Commissioner and Human Rights Council, has perverted the fight against
racism into a fight against the Jewish state, a democratic freedom-loving
home to more than a million Arabs and a bulwark against the ravages of
anti-semitism for all Jews. 

Remember that the streets of Durban pulsated with signs reading "for the
liberation of Quds, machine guns based on FAITH and ISLAM must be used" and
"the martyr's blood irrigates the tree of revolution in
<http://www.foxnews.com/topics/palestine.htm#r_src=ramp> Palestine," while
the gross intolerance inside the Durban meeting halls ended on September 8,
2001. Given the inextricable connection between hate and violence, shunning
Durban III on September 22 in New York City just days after the tenth
anniversary of 9/11 was a no-brainer.

Now comes the hard part. U.N. demonization of Israel serves to justify
Palestinian rejection of negotiations and coexistence, which in turn fuels
U.N. support of a unilateral declaration of Palestinian statehood. 

The cycle will only be broken if Palestinians and their U.N. enablers are
made to face real consequences for attempting to reap the rewards of
hate-mongering.

Anne Bayefsky is a Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute and director of the
Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust.



Read more:
<http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/06/02/obama-says-no-to-durban-iii-but-u
n-racism-summit-still-has-too-many-supporters/#ixzz1O99kEI1a>
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/06/02/obama-says-no-to-durban-iii-but-un
-racism-summit-still-has-too-many-supporters/#ixzz1O99kEI1a



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to