http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm

 

WELCOME TO SHARIAMERICA

 

By Debra Rae
June 3, 2011
NewsWithViews.com

Acts 17 Apologetics has posted a provocative U-Tube video in which David
Wood welcomes listeners to what he dubs "SHARIAmerica."[1]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn1>  In it, Wood offers
compelling reason why our government's official position regarding the
"Holy" Qur'an exemplifies religious duplicity. The postmodern term for
"double standard" is "political correctness." It entails unfair application
of a principle, rule, or expectation to different groups-only one of which
is condemned for the slightest offense. The other is treated far more
leniently. 

One would expect that, if a double standard were applied in "the land of the
free," it would favor Bible principles. Indeed, in 1892 the U.S. Supreme
Court established that "our laws and our institutions must necessarily be
based upon the teachings of the Redeemer of Mankind. It is impossible that
it should be otherwise; and in this sense and to this extent, our
civilization and our institutions are emphatically Christian." 

Even so, freedom of religion allows free exercise of the Christian faith
while, at the same time, it gives place to those of differing persuasions.
In his 1791 autobiography, Benjamin Franklin "did not disapprove" of a
Pennsylvania meeting place designed to accommodate preachers of all
religions. "Even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to
preach Mohammedanism to us," Franklin added, "he would find a pulpit at his
service."[2] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn2> 

Put another way: "Tolerant 'R US," and stats prove it. While the population
of the United States exceeds 300 million, only three percent are Muslim; all
the same, in addition to Islamic day- and weekend- schools, there are some
two thousand mosques scattered across our nation.[3]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn3> 

At taxpayer expense, the University of Michigan, Dearborn and the
Indianapolis International Airport even provide footbaths for ritualistic
Muslim washing! While Christian students are denied a moment of silent
prayer in state schools and athletic fields, Muslim counterparts at Carver
Elementary School, San Diego are granted fifteen-minute prayer breaks each
afternoon. Double standard? You bet.[4]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn4> 

Will the Real Voice of Tolerance Please Stand Up?

"No compulsion in religion" is a Quranic principle; nonetheless, a
co-founder and Board Chair of the Council on American Islamic Relations,
Omar Ahma, believes that the Qur'an-not the U.S. Constitution-should be the
highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.


Of the seventy percent of the world's population who live in countries that
restrict religious liberty, most are Muslim-majority countries (plus China
and North Korea).[5] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn5>
In publicly praising Islam for its "proud tradition of tolerance," President
Obama seemingly ignores the plight of Christians who pay a tragically high
price for professing their Christian faith in those nations.

Just ask former Muslim terrorist-turned-Christian, Walid Shoebat. He and his
ilk are by no means alone in risking life and limb to proclaim the Gospel of
Jesus Christ. Focused on reaching Muslims for Christ, a notable
Arab-American evangelist, Father Zakaria Botros, daily faces threat of
assassination. The same holds true for the Son of Hamas author Mosab Yousef.
In chronicling his conversion to Christ, Yousef has, in effect, "declared
war on Islam"; and some Muslim fundamentalists, also in the U.S., believe
that he must be killed for it.[6]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn6> 

According to the Center for International Policy (CIP), Brigette Gabriel
"has made a post-9/11 career out of roundly denouncing Islam, decrying
'political correctness,' and promoting the concept of an existential clash
of cultures." The CIP also states that, "Her pro-Israel, anti-Islam spiel,
coupled with her compelling personal history, has made her a popular
speaker, writer, and general 'expert.' She appears sometimes as a
commentator on television news and radio programs, often speaking out for
the rights of Muslim women."[7]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn7> 

For sharing her "compelling personal history," Gabriel faces threat of
reprisal. Hence, when speaking at the Universities of Memphis and North
Carolina at Chapel Hill and elsewhere, she requires police protection-and
not because of some phantom fear. Iranian Gilda Ghanipour knows all about
it. Following her conversion to Christianity, Ghanipour sought asylum and
later won amnesty in America; but before she received the good news, she
went missing.[8] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn8> 

While Islamists pronounce death sentences on Muslims who convert to
Christianity, American converts to Islam generally face no such threat. In
1968, for example, basketball legend Kareem Abdul-Jabbar joined the Nation
of Islam before retaking the Shahada and converting to Sunni Islam that
summer. Today, he's a best-selling author and well-respected spokesperson
for cancer cures. Even post-9/11, when he formally joined the Nation of
Islam (2003), Michael Jackson maintained his undisputed status as "King of
Pop."[9] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn9> 

Preferential Freedom from Offense 

Based in California, the Council on Islamic Education guides publishers in
how to represent Islam favorably in public school textbooks. Tinsel-Town
executives follow similar protocol. Over the last thirty years, Hollywood
has relentlessly vilified pious Christians. More likely than not, portrayals
of preachers and priests are uncomplimentary, if not outright slanderous. 

Whereas libel against Christians stands virtually unchallenged, Iran
demanded apology from Hollywood last year for its unflattering portrayal of
"The Ayatollah" in the award-winning film, The Wrestler.[10]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn10>  In fact, every year,
the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) introduces a resolution to
condemn "gratuitously offensive attacks" on Islam. 

Anti-defamation policies ignore non-Muslims whom the Qur'an fingers as "the
worst of creatures" all the while they indulge Muslims, whom the Qur'an
exalts as "the best of people ever raised up." Though not legally binding,
these resolutions nonetheless set precedence for global treaties with
teeth.[11] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn11> 

"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me." [link
to regarding sticks and stones
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Masters/roy101.htm> ]

Most agree that civility is a good thing, but then Islamic law actually
forbids an infidel to offend a Muslim. In the eyes of Allah-whether an
American, or not-one is denied liberty to disagree with the Prophet. Doing
so is "a blasphemous affront" (shirk). 

Even if slander against a Muslim represents the truth, an infidel may not
point it out. To Islamists, lying is preferred. One of Islam's most
distinguished theologians Al-Ghazzali (1058-1111) wrote: "Know that a lie is
not wrong in itself. If a lie is the only way of obtaining a good result, it
is permissible. We must lie when truth leads to unpleasant results."[12]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn12> 

In contrast, grown-ups in free society understand that being offended in the
public arena is an inevitable price of free choice in matters of faith and
morality. Fact is, Christians are well acquainted with the plethora of
plaques, bumper stickers, slogans, and lyrics that daily offend. 

Under a specious "wall of separation" principle, the ACLU, People for the
American Way, and Americans United for Separation of Church and State
repeatedly denigrate doctrines and symbols held sacred to countless
Christian Americans expected to "eat it." Yet, while sidestepping reference
to Christians (or any other religionists, for that matter), our President
commits to "fighting negative stereotypes against Islam wherever they
appear."[13] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn13> 

Governmental Policy in "SHARIAmerica" 

Clearly, President Obama is a friend of Islam. He's gone so far as to host a
summit in Washington for entrepreneur Muslims, but no comparable summit
features Christian or Hindu entrepreneurs.[14]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn14>  In further deference
to Islam, the President even appointed a new diplomatic position. While the
U.S. never before has had an official representative to one religion, both
Presidents Bush and Obama sent envoys to the OIC; and both celebrated
Ramadan at the White House. 

In response to the question, "Can't we all just get along?" administration
officials have erased from the national security policy lexicon phrases like
"Islamic extremism" and "jihad." One former FBI agent claims that to speak
up about the Islamist threat is to be pushed out of the agency. Not only the
bad guys, but also the whistle blowers are likely to be targeted for
internal investigation.[15]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn15> 

To Islamists, one who turns pages of the Qur'an with licked fingers is an
apostate-guilty of renouncing Islam, an offense punishable by Islamic law.
Accordingly, a Department of Defense memo issued at Gitmo purportedly
requires non-Muslim troops to hold the "Holy" Qur'an with two hands in a
"manner signaling respect and reverence." In full view of detainees, the
handler must first don clean gloves. When manipulating any part of the
Qur'an, he must favor the right hand (not the left hand used for toileting).
In fact, a handler (Muslim or not) is commanded to treat the "Holy" Qur'an
as "a fragile piece of delicate art."[16]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn16> 

The story's different with respect to law abiding, non-Muslim Americans. At
last summer's 15th annual Arab International Festival, Detroit police
arrested three men and one woman representing the group, Acts 17
Apologetics, and charged them with "breach of peace" for what amounted to
"holding a camera." Mind you, none handed out divisive literature, nor did
they argue with festival attendees; yet all were manhandled and
handcuffed-apparently for their mere presence, which in itself was viewed as
"offensive."[17] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn17> 

Holy Moly! 

Although Supreme Court decisions have prompted numerous attempts to pass a
constitutional amendment to the contrary, many Americans accept that burning
the American flag is a rightful expression of free speech. So far, the
proposed amendment has fallen short of the necessary two-thirds support in
the Senate. 

But the verdict's in respecting book burning-holy books, to be specific. In
the wake of the Gainsville Qur'an-burning incident, Secretary of State
Hillary Clinton characterized the Reverend Terry Jones' actions as
"disrespectful" and "disgraceful." General David Petraeus found them
"hateful" and "intolerant," and many more concur that Jones' actions were
shortsighted and unnecessary. President Obama agrees. 

That said, America's official stance is this: Flag burning, okay; book
burning, no way. But here's the caveat: An U.S. military spokesman told CNN
that, in a devoutly Muslim country, distributing donated Bibles translated
into two Afghan languages could cause a violent backlash against Americans.
In war zones, he added, U.S. troops are ordered to burn their trash. It's
military policy; therefore, the U.S. government burned the Bibles as-get
this-trash. Yes, trash.

With tongue-in-cheek, David Wood reasons: We don't burn the Holy Qur'an
because offended Muslims might go on a killing spree, but then we do burn
Holy Bibles. Why? Because offended Muslims might go on a killing spree.

So much for "Islam's proud tradition of tolerance"-and its claiming to be a
religion of peace. For the U.S. government to favor the "Holy" Qur'an with a
privileged status over all other books-most specifically, the Holy
Bible-signals, yet again, that the Doctrine of Political Correctness trumps
the Establishment Clause of the U.S. Constitution.[18]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn18> 

Better to Make Love, Not War

Unfortunately, the administration's conciliatory approach to Islam is met
consistently with actual or thwarted terrorist attacks tied to Islamic
elements-e.g., attempts to detonate car- and underwear- bombs, as the case
may be, in Times Square, Dallas, and Detroit. Add to these the Fort Hood
massacre, and it's anybody's guess how radicals will retaliate in the wake
of Osama Bin Laden's recent demise.

It may well be better to "make love, not war." But, as the saying goes,
"true love is like a pair of socks; ya' gotta' have two, and they gotta'
match." That is to say, alliances are destined to fail when one side is
treated with duplicity while the other is condemned for the slightest
offense. Disingenuous appeasement to placate the ire of another can't be a
good thing, nor are compulsion, privileges, and freedom from offense and
negative stereotypes, when applied one-sidedly. These do not a love match
make.[19] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn19> 

The Emperor's Naked!

I'm reminded of a story by Hans Christian Andersen in which an Emperor
commissions two tailors to make him new clothes meant to be invisible to
incompetent or stupid folk. In response, the wily swindlers present their
Emperor with imaginary clothes. Fearful of being judged incompetent or
stupid, the Emperor feigns delight and, then, "wears" his new garments in a
grand parade. Similarly fearful, the cheering throng follow suit until, that
is, a wide-eyed child proclaims with candor that the Emperor, in fact, is
naked![20] <http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn20>  Too many
well-intentioned Americans, even Christians, join the PC throng openly
celebrating the Emperor's "new clothes." For fear of appearing Islamophobic,
intolerant, even hateful, none dare expose pretense. Those who discern, and
then expose, blatant religious duplicity face certain judgment. Beyond
incompetent, or stupid, whistle blowers are tagged hateful, narrow-minded
bigots who, for the sake of "getting along," must be mocked, then silenced.

Bottom line: Postmodern civility can't cut the mustard. It takes a guileless
child to speak truth in love.[21]
<http://www.newswithviews.com/Rae/debra194.htm#_ftn21> 

Footnotes:

1. Shariamerica: Islam, Obama, and the Establishment Clause
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErzxOz3Dzv8&feature=player_embedded#at=194>
.
2. The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin
<http://www.earlyamerica.com/lives/franklin/chapt10/> .
3. Omar Khalidi. "Mosque." Contemporary American Religion (New York:
Macmillan, 2000).
4. Public College to install special sinks to Muslim students
<http://www.bing.com/videos/watch/video/fox-news-sink-stink/eae91dad9d4a45cf
b0d2eae91dad9d4a45cfb0d2-875022451355?q=foot%2Bbaths%2Bfor%2Bmuslims%2Bin%2B
public%2B&FORM=VIRE8> 
5. Mindy Belz. "A 'Global Crisis': Religious Liberty is What's at Stake in
the Muslim World, and Beyond." World (26 March 2011): 40.
6. Priya Abraham. "Brothers to the End." World (15 July 2006): 17-18
7. Bridgette Gabriel. "Muslims Muzzling Memphis
<http://www.AmericanCongressForTruth.com> ." 13 April 2006): 1-3. 
8. Asylum seeker realized her dream but now is missing
<http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/24/local/me-asylum24> , LA Times.
9. Encyclopedia of Muslim-American History (1 ed.). (Facts On File, Inc.,
June 2010): ISBN 978-1-4381-3040-8.
10. Hollywood film The Wrestler 'insults Iran'
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/3740936/Hollywood-film-The-Wrestler
-insults-Iran.html> 
11. 11. Surah 3:110
12. Watch(wo)man
<http://watch-woman.blogspot.com/2006/09/quotes-by-arabs.html> 
13. Barak Obama Quotes
<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/b/barackobam410718.html> 
14. Emily Belz. "The Special Religion." World (5 June 2010): 46-48.
15. Ibid.: 48.
16. How to Handle the Koran; Official D.O.D. Guidelines
<http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1418494/posts> . (No Similar Rules
for Christian Bible)
17. Emily Belz. "Smelting Pot." World (17 July 2010): 44-46.
18. The First Amendment prohibits making any law "respecting an
establishment of religion" or impeding its free exercise, freedom of
speech/press, right to peaceable assembly and to petition for redress of
grievances.
19. The Emperor's New Clothes
<http://www.answers.com/topic/the-emperor-s-new-clothes#ixzz1LKg0aTIg> .
20. Quotes
<http://thinkexist.com/quotation/true_love_is_like_a_pair_of_socks_you_gotta
_have/174889.html> 
21. Isaiah 11:6 

C 2010 Debra Rae - All Rights Reserved 

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to