http://www.greeleygazette.com/press/?p=9578


Soldier doing 15 years for shooting terrorist in self-defense
Posted by Jack Minor • 
May 12, 2011 •

Prosecution withheld key evidence, judge says, "So what"


by Jack Minor

 

While the nation rejoices at the death of Osama bin Ladin, a soldier who killed 
a terrorist that attempted to grab his weapon continues to serve out a 15- year 
sentence.

 His mother, Assistant District Attorney Vicki Behenna, told the Gazette 
details of the case which are also available on a website supporting her son.

 LT Michael Behenna was deployed to Iraq in September 2007. His platoon was 
attacked in April of the following year by Al Qaeda operatives, resulting in 
the death of six people.

 The following month Ali Mansur, a known terrorist, was detained and held for 
his role in the April attack. The Army, without explanation, released Mansur 
and ordered Michael to return him to his home.

 Prior to his release, the terrorist lunged at Michael attempting to get his 
gun. Michael defended himself by firing two shots at Mansur, killing him. After 
learning of the incident, the Army charged Michael with premeditated murder.

 During the trial, the prosecution argued that Mansur was killed execution 
style as he sat on a rock. On February 25, their expert witness, Dr. Herbert 
MacDonnell, stated the evidence indicated that Mansur was actually standing and 
reaching for Behenna's gun when he was shot. MacDonnell has over 50 years of 
experience in forensic science. He is the director of the Laboratory for 
Forensic Science in Corning, N.Y. and participated in investigations of the Dr. 
Martin Luther King Jr. and Sen. Robert Kennedy assassinations. He also 
testified in the O.J. Simpson murder case.

 The following day, Behenna told the jury that, while interrogating Mansur, he 
turned back to talk to the interpreter. At that time Mansur, who was only three 
to four feet away, lunged for Michael's gun. Michael  then moved to the left 
and fired two shots. This explanation was identical to what MacDonnell had told 
prosecutors the evening before.

 During a brief recess, MacDonnell met with the prosecutors and said the 
evidence indicated that, "Michael must be telling the truth" and in the 
interest of justice they should put him on the stand.

 The prosecution team reportedly looked at MacDonnell coldly and told him his 
services were no longer needed and he would be flown home that night. As he 
left the courtroom he told the defense counsel, Jack Zimmerman, that he would 
be a great witness for Michael. He stated he could not elaborate as he was 
still an expert witness for the government, but told them to ask the 
prosecutors.

 The following day, based on MacDonnell's comments, Zimmerman asked the 
prosecutors if they had any exculpatory evidence that should be provided to 
them. The prosecution denied having any such evidence.

 During the closing arguments prosecutor Jason Elbert argued it was 
"impossible" that Mansur was reaching for Michael's gun, despite what his 
expert witness had told him.

 As a result of the withheld testimony, Michael was convicted of unpremeditated 
murder. Following the conviction, but prior to the sentencing, Dr. MacDonnell 
submitted an email to the prosecution expressing his concern over not being 
able to testify.

 He said, "As I demonstrated to you and to the other two prosecutors, Dr. Berg, 
Sgt. McCaulley and Sgt. Rogers, from the evidence I feel that Ali Mansur had to 
have been shot in his chest when he was standing. As he dropped straight down 
he was shot again at the very instant that his head passed in front of the 
muzzle."

 MacDonnell continued, "Admittedly, this would be an amazing coincidence, 
however, it fits the facts and … I cannot think of a more logical explanation. 
This scenario is consistent with the two shots being close together, consistent 
with their horizontal trajectory, consistent with the bloodstains on the floor, 
and consistent with the condition of the 9 mm flattened out bullet which was 
tumbling… When I heard Lt. Michael Behenna testify [Thursday] as to the 
circumstances of how the two shots were fired, I could not believe how close it 
was to the scenario I had described to you on Wednesday. I am sure that had I 
testified I would have wanted to give my reenactment so the jury could have had 
the option of considering how well the defendant's story fit the physical 
facts."

Following receipt of the email, one of the prosecutors revealed its contents to 
the court. Despite this revelation, the judge subsequently refused defense 
requests for a mistrial. Behenna was sentenced to 15 years in prison. In 
December Michael's family appeared before the Army Clemency Board.

 During the appearance, the family stated Michael's sentence was 50 percent 
higher than the highest sentence given to any soldier convicted of 
unpremeditated murder in a combat zone. The board was also presented with 
letters from the Governor of Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Attorney General, Law 
Enforcement Agency Heads, and the entire Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.

 Michael has  had an unblemished record in prison and three offers of 
employment if released. The chairman of the clemency board said that Michael 
had "turned the corner" and then subsequently refused to grant clemency with no 
explanation given.

 Several days later, Michael appeared before the Army Appeals Court. During 
this hearing the Army began to be taking a different approach. According to 
Vicki Behenna, the Army is now claiming that even if Mansur had lunged at 
Michael and reached for his weapon, Michael would still be guilty of murder. 
Their reasoning is that Michael lost his right of self defense when he pointed 
a loaded gun at the terrorist. A decision on the appeal could take up to 
another year.

 Michael is among a group known as the "Leavenworth 10."  The group consists of 
soldiers and Marines serving time at Ft. Leavenworth for killing members of Al 
Qaeda or Iraqi insurgents. Supporters of the group have criticized what they 
see as "politically correct" convictions."

 Vicki said, "I understand having rules in place to protect innocent civilians, 
but when you're talking about an enemy combatant like Mansur, our troops should 
know they can defend themselves. If you're not going to do that, don't send 
them over there." She went on to say if the Army disagreed with the action 
Michael took they should have reprimanded him rather than charging him with 
murder.

 When asked why she felt the Army decided to charge Michael for killing a known 
terrorist, Vicki said her husband, Scott, believes it was possible the military 
prosecuted Michael and the rest of the "Leavenworth 10z' in order to help 
secure a Status of Forces Agreement with Iraq. An SOFA is an agreement between 
two countries detailing the rights and privileges of the foreign country's 
military members. "I think a lot of the prosecutions that took place in 2008 
were to show the Iraqi government we would prosecute soldiers that injured or 
killed civilians."

 Supporters of Michael are encouraged to send him a card and sign a petition on 
the website showing their support.

 Requests made to the Army for comment on Lt. Behenna's case were not returned



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to