<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/index.asp> Home »
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/showpage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=84&FID=442>
Jerusalem Issue Briefs » The Gaza Flotillas to Come: Some Ground Rules before
Setting Out
by
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=610&FID=442&PID=0&IID=793>
Alan Baker
Published June 2011
Vol. 11, No. 3 5 June 2011
The
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=112&FID=568&PID=0&IID=2117>
Gaza Flotillas to Come:
Some Ground Rules before Setting Out
Alan Baker
* An ostensibly civilian, humanitarian flotilla was employed in May 2010
to demonstratively breach the Israeli naval blockade of the Gaza coast. This
flotilla was organized by the Turkish IHH, which has extensive links to extreme
Islamic terror groups. Provoking a confrontation with Israel continues to be
the primary aim.
* Since May 2010, the Israeli government has altered the manner in which
it administers the limitations on the transfer of goods to Gaza. It now
specifically prohibits only those materials that might be taken and directed by
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=112&FID=568&PID=0&IID=2106>
Hamas and other terror groups in furtherance of their hostile purposes.
* There is no humanitarian emergency among the civilian population in
Gaza, and hence there can be no justification for conveying emergency shipments
intended to alleviate an emergency that clearly does not exist. Any genuine
wish to provide materials to the Gaza population can be directed through
Israeli ports and the relevant authorities.
* Hamas routinely fires missiles randomly at Israeli civilian targets.
Thus a situation of ongoing armed conflict exists between Hamas and Israel,
which has the prerogative to institute a naval and land blockade to prevent the
introduction of weapons and materials that could serve belligerent purposes.
Such a blockade is well established in international law and practice.
* It is internationally accepted that any attempt to breach such a
blockade may be prevented by Israeli naval patrols. Such a process may take
place outside the area of the blockade if the declared intention of the
flotilla is to violate the blockade. Furthermore, any vessel refusing to
respond to the demands of the naval forces may be stopped forcefully.
Aiming to Provoke a Confrontation
Since the May 2010 wave of "flotillas" organized by Turkish and other groups,
ostensibly conveying cargoes of vital and indispensible aid intended to reach
the population of Gaza, much has been written and televised as to the real
intentions of the organizers. Additionally, several enquiries have been
instituted in order to analyze the legal, military, and other aspects of the
flotilla affair and the way it was handled.
What seems to have been made very clear by the groups that organized the
flotilla, especially the Turkish-led IHH terror-related organization, is the
fact that the use of an ostensibly civilian, humanitarian flotilla and a huge
PR campaign in order to demonstratively breach the Israeli naval blockade of
the Gaza coast and thereby challenge Israel's policy regarding the Gaza Strip
and provoke a confrontation with Israel, was clearly and continues to be the
primary aim.
Conveying humanitarian goods to what was represented as a distressed Gaza
population was a minor, secondary, and perhaps even incidental aim, at least
among the most vocal participants in the flotilla, although there were indeed
some who participated out of a bona fide belief in the importance of
identifying themselves with, and trying to alleviate what they genuinely
thought to be, a humanitarian crisis among the residents of Gaza.
The regrettable outcome of the May 2010 flotilla and the extensive
international echo that still reverberates throughout the international
community have nevertheless brought about a series of changes in the "situation
on the ground."
The logic and aim of Israel's blockade is to prevent the Hamas terror
organization presently administering Gaza from acquiring arms, ammunition, and
other supplies that could contribute to hostile activities against Israel.
Since May 2010, the Israeli government has altered the manner in which it
administers the limitations on the transfer of goods to Gaza. It now
specifically prohibits only those materials that might be taken and directed by
Hamas and other terror groups in furtherance of their hostile purposes.
Furthermore, since the May 2010 flotilla incident and in light of the
considerable publicity that has been given to the daily flow of goods and
supplies into the Gaza Strip, it has become very clear to all that there is no
humanitarian crisis in Gaza and all essential and other provisions are
available to all residents.
On the other hand, the practical military and tactical implications and lessons
of the May 2010 flotilla have been learned by Israel's military forces and the
appropriate conclusions as to how to handle future flotillas have been reached
and put into place.
Some Basic Facts
In light of these significant changes in the situation on the ground, one may
wonder on what basis could future planned flotillas be justified and, in a
similar vein, what might be the real intentions and motives of the organizers
who are busy preparing the next flotilla touted for June 2011.
In this context, it might be pertinent to review some of the basic ground rules
surrounding the flotilla phenomenon:
* It is widely acknowledged that there is no humanitarian emergency among
the civilian population in Gaza. Hence there can be no justification for
conveying emergency shipments intended to alleviate an emergency that clearly
does not exist. Most materials and foodstuffs are permitted to enter Gaza after
examination by the Israeli authorities in order to prevent tactical materials
from reaching Hamas and other terror groups. Any genuine wish to provide
materials to the Gaza population can be directed through Israeli ports and the
relevant authorities.
* It is widely acknowledged that Gaza is independently administered by an
internationally regarded terror organization - Hamas - that is sponsored and
supplied with arms by
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=112&FID=568&PID=0&IID=2102>
Iran and that maintains an ongoing and actively hostile attitude towards
Israel. The territory also serves as host to other terror groups such as the
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=112&FID=568&PID=0&IID=2111>
Islamic Jihad. Practically speaking, this hostility takes the form of
incitement to terror through all levels of the population by all means of
publicity - in kindergartens, schools, colleges, on the radio and television,
and through the web. It involves the smuggling into the area and stockpiling of
missiles, guns, and ammunition for use against Israel and its civilian
population and the routine firing of such missiles randomly at Israeli civilian
targets.
* It is widely acknowledged that Israel does not hold the status of an
"occupying power" in Gaza. In fact, Israel transferred its civilian powers and
responsibilities over the Gaza Strip into the hands of the
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=112&FID=568&PID=0&IID=2105>
Palestinian Authority and withdrew its forces and civilians. The Palestinian
Authority's control in Gaza was later usurped by Hamas, which turned the area
into a base for mounting terror attacks against Israel.
* Since such a terror organization is in sole and effective control of
Gaza and directs ongoing and active hostilities against Israel and its
civilians, it is widely acknowledged that a situation of ongoing armed conflict
exists between Hamas, its associates, and Israel. In such a situation of armed
conflict, Israel has the prerogative to institute a naval and land blockade
with a view to prevent the introduction of weapons and materials that could
serve the belligerent purposes of Hamas. The institution of such a blockade is
well established in international law and practice.
* It is internationally acknowledged that a naval blockade in such a
situation, once instituted and maintained in accordance with the rules of
international law with the appropriate public notification as to the area of
sea that it covers, effective enforcement, impartiality and consideration of
humanitarian needs of the population, is fully in accordance with accepted
international law and practice.
* Similarly, it is internationally accepted that any attempt to breach
such a blockade by civilian or other vessels may be prevented by Israeli naval
patrols, and the vessels involved may be stopped, searched, and sent to an
Israeli port in order to check their cargoes. Such a process may take place
outside the area of the blockade if the declared intention of the flotilla is
to violate the blockade. Furthermore, any vessel refusing to respond to the
demands of the naval forces may be stopped forcefully.
In light of all the above, there is good reason to assume that the instigators
of the planned flotilla intending to set sail for Gaza in June 2011 would be
hard put to justify themselves other than by admitting their real character and
motives as a provocative and political demonstration.
Sponsorship, organization, and presence on such flotillas by terror
organizations or their activists disguised as humanitarian groups will no
longer deceive an international community which witnessed the May 2010
flotilla, the premeditated violence of its organizers, and the regrettable and
tragic outcome.
While such demonstrations may well take place if only for their PR value, they
will have to abide by internationally accepted rules and prove their bona fide
nature in order to be considered as genuine.
* * *
Amb. Alan Baker, Director of the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the
<http://www.jcpa.org/JCPA/Templates/ShowPage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=112&FID=568&PID=0&IID=429>
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, is former Legal Adviser to Israel's
Foreign Ministry and former Ambassador of Israel to Canada.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic? Head on over to our discussion list,
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org
http://www.intellnet.org
Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods,
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,'
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com
osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
