Iran's Dirty 9/11 Secrets

Posted By Kenneth R. Timmerman On September 9, 2011 @ 12:20 am In Daily
Mailer,FrontPage | 3 Comments
<http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/09/iran%e2%80%99s-dirty-911-secrets/print/#
comments_controls> 

It has taken nearly ten years, but the real story of Iran's direct, material
involvement in the 9/11 conspiracy is finally coming to light. And it's
being revealed not by the U.S. government or by Congressional investigators
but by private attorneys representing families of the 9/11 victims in U.S.
District Court.

Just one week before the 9/11 Commission sent its final report to the
printers in July 2004, diligent staffers discovered a six-page classified
National Security Agency analysis summarizing what the U.S. intelligence
community had learned about Iran's assistance to the 9/11 hijackers.

They happened upon the document by chance. It had been tucked away at the
bottom of the last box in the last stack of classified documents they were
reviewing. But it was so explosive that several Commissioners pushed hard to
make sure the information it contained was included in the final report,
despite intense push back from the intelligence community.

The page and a half section that made the final cut (see pages 240-241
<http://information.iran911case.com/Exhibit_1.pdf> ) details repeated trips
to Iran by 8-10 of the "muscle" hijackers between October 2000 and February
2001. Flying in from Saudi Arabia, Damascus, and Beirut, the future
hijackers were accompanied by "senior Hezbollah operatives" who were in fact
agents of the Iranian regime.

The information was so explosive that the CIA lobbied hard to get it
expunged from the final report, in part because they had detected some of
the movements as they were occurring but failed to appreciate their import.
"They saw them as travel through Iran, not travel to Iran," a senior 9/11
Commission staffer told me at the time.

By the time the staffers had read into the 75 source documents on a Sunday
morning out at NSA headquarters at Fort Meade, MD, the Commission was
pushing up against the end of its mandate and could not do any additional
work. The information was so serious and had such clear geopolitical import
that it "requires further investigation by the U.S. government," they
concluded. Many of the Commissions and senior staff who were aware of the
document find assumed someone else would pick up the ball.

But as attorney Thomas Mellon, Jr. and his colleagues representing Fiona
Havlish and other 9/11 widows and family members discovered, no such
investigation was ever carried out. Not even the Congressional intelligence
committees would go near the subject, despite direct appeals from the
Havlish plaintiffs and a review of many of the original still-classified
documents cited in the report.

I was engaged by the Havlish attorneys in 2004 to carry out the
investigation the 9/11 Commission report called on the U.S. government to
handle. We had no governmental authority, hardly any budget, and no access
to classified intelligence or intelligence assets. But what we found and
made public starting this May is enough to hang a fish. Put simply:

. The Islamic Republic of Iran helped design the 9/11 plot;

. provided intelligence support to identify and train the operatives who
carried it out;

. allowed the future hijackers to evade U.S. and Pakistani surveillance on
key trips to Afghanistan where they received the final order of mission from
Osama bin Laden, by escorting them through Iranian borders without passport
stamps;

. evacuated hundreds of top al Qaeda operatives from Afghanistan to Iran
after the 9/11 just as U.S. forces launched their offensive;

. provided safe haven and continued financial support to al Qaeda cadres for
years after 9/11; 

. allowed al Qaeda to use Iran as an operational base for additional terror
attacks, in particular the May 2003 bombings in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Key elements of our proofs are in bullet points at the end of this article.
<http://www.kentimmerman.com/news/2011_05_19-Havlish-Iran-links-lawsuit.htm>
For those wishing a more detailed account, here is a partially-redacted
affidavit <http://information.iran911case.com/Exhibit_2.pdf>  I provided to
the Court that traces the Islamic Republic of Iran's relationship al Qaeda
back to the early 1990s.

Panic at CIA

As the Havlish case was getting closer to making its information public last
year, certain old guard elements within the CIA went into a panic mode,
apparently worried that their failure to act on indicators and warnings in
2000 and 2001 would come to light and ruin their post-Agency careers. I can
now reveal that they made several attempts to suborn two of the Havlish
witnesses who were located overseas.

In the first attempt, in August 2010, an individual presenting himself as a
CIA official, told our witness that the Agency wanted to "break" the Havlish
litigation against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and considered the
witness's testimony to be crucial to the lawsuit's success.

He asked the witness to publicly recant his testimony, in exchange for which
the CIA official promised to provide him with fresh passports for himself
and his family under new identities, as well as a job and two year's salary
guarantee.

The second attempt, in December 2010, was even more audacious. This time,
another individual claiming to be a CIA official showed a different witness
confidential documents that clearly had been stolen from the legal
consortium, then took him into a U.S. embassy and grilled him for five
hours.

The stolen documents included internal Havlish memos, PowerPoint
presentations, and an excerpt from the videotaped testimony of one of the
witnesses. None of these documents had ever been made public nor were they
in possession of the witnesses themselves. Havlish took great care to
protect these documents out of concern for the security of our witnesses.
The CIA officer then asked that the witness retract his testimony and
offered him a substantial monetary payment in exchange.

After I reported those attempts at witness tampering to a Congressional
oversight committee, they ceased.

In the past six months the intelligence community, under new leadership, has
begun to take a hard look at what it actually knew about Iran and al Qaeda
prior to the 9/11 attacks. From what I've been hearing, what they're finding
is coming as a big shock to a lot of people, especially those who bought
into the conventional wisdom that the Shiite fundamentalist regime in Iran
would never cooperate with Sunni extremists such as al Qaeda (or Hamas, for
that matter).

Recent events in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the U.S. military has publicly
cited Iran for providing weapons, money, and military training to the
Taliban and other insurgent groups to kill Americans, has helped to change
the mindset. So have the announcements over the past two years by the
Department of Treasury that Iran is arming and training al Qaeda
<http://information.iran911case.com/Exhibit_30.pdf>  and the Taliban.
<http://www.newsmax.com/KenTimmerman/treasurytalibanalqaida/2010/07/23/id/36
5494>  Most recently, Treasury designated
<http://www.forbes.com/sites/nathanvardi/2011/07/28/al-qaedas-money-man-in-i
ran/?partner=relatedstoriesbox>  a group of al Qaeda financiers they
revealed were operating out of Iran.

But the big question remains: now that we can begin to appreciate the extent
of Iran's involvement in the 9/11 attacks - and in the ongoing attacks that
are killing Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan - what are we going to do
about it?

Stay tuned.

Kenneth R. Timmerman is president and CEO of the Foundation for Democracy in
Iran <http://www.iran.org/> , and returns to FPM with this essay. His latest
book, St. Peter <http://www.kentimmerman.com/st-peters-bones.htm> 's Bones,
explores the origins of Islam and the persecuted church in Iraq. He was
awarded the Reed Irvine Accuracy in Media prize for Investigative Journalism
in February 2011.

  _____  

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://frontpagemag.com

URL to article:
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/09/09/iran%e2%80%99s-dirty-911-secrets/

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to