http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-administration-defends-republicans-sla
m-taiwan-fighter-jet-decision

 


Obama Administration Defends, Republicans Slam Taiwan Fighter-Jet Decision


By Patrick Goodenough <http://cnsnews.com/source/patrick-goodenough> 

September 22, 2011

http://w.sharethis.com/images/check-small.png

 <http://cnsnews.com/image/f-16-0> F-16

Lockheed Martin calls its F-16 Fighting Falcon "the world's most capable
multirole fighter." (Image: Lockheed Martin)

(CNSNews.com) - Republican critics accuse the Obama administration of bowing
to Chinese pressure with its decision to upgrade aging Taiwanese warplanes
rather than sell the island the later generation fighters it has requested.

The administration notified Congress Wednesday of its intention to help
Taiwan retrofit its fleet of 145 F-16 Fighting Falcon A (single seater) and
B (two-seater) fighters bought 19 years ago, as part of a $5.85 billion arms
package that includes equipment, parts, logistical support and a pilot
training program.

Taiwan's government thanked the U.S. but said it would continue pressing for
its priority request, first made in 2006, to buy 66 F-16 C/D jets, to help
defend itself against potential aggression from China, which views Taiwan as
a rebellious province whose "reunification" with the mainland is inevitable.

"The upgrade of F-16 A/Bs will help enhance our defense capability,"
Taiwanese Foreign Affairs Minister Timothy Yang said during a late night
press conference. "We will continue to push for U.S. sale of F-16 C/Ds."

 <http://cnsnews.com/image/f-16-2> F-16

Lockheed Martin calls its F-16 Fighting Falcon "the world's most capable
multirole fighter." (Image: Lockheed Martin)

Separately, Defense Minister Kao Hua-chu pledged to continue urging the U.S.
to provide new fighters, noting that the administration had not ruled out
selling F-16 C/Ds in the future. Taiwan also has F-5s that are more than 30
years old. 

Earlier this week, Taiwan's deputy defense minister, Andrew Yang, was quoted
as suggesting to an annual U.S.-Taiwan defense industry conference in
Virginia that Chinese pressure was behind the holdup.

"These years, China is showing stronger and stronger reaction to U.S.-Taiwan
arms sales, and that [has] turned your country more wary with arms sales,"
he said.

The U.S.-Taiwan Business Council says the sale of the 66 F-16 C/Ds Taiwan
has requested "would help secure over 23,000 American jobs."

Critics of the administration's decision not to sell Taiwan the fighters
accused it of succumbing to Beijing.

"President Obama's refusal to sell Taiwan new military jets is yet another
example of his weak leadership in foreign policy," said GOP presidential
aspirant Mitt Romney.

"President Obama has ignored Taiwan's request and caved into the
unreasonable demands of China at the cost of well-paying American jobs," he
added.

"This deal has Beijing's fingerprints all over it," said Rep. Ileana
Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

"The upgrade of older model F-16s is a modest step in the right direction
but woefully insufficient to meet Taiwan's increasingly urgent requirements
for modern combat fighters and other defensive weapons systems," she said.

Ros-Lehtinen said the decision to exclude F-16 C/Ds from the arms package
called into question its "commitment to longstanding policy to ensure that
Taiwan is able to defend itself from mainland China, as legislatively
mandated in the Taiwan Relations Act."

The 1979 Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) commits the U.S. to provide Taiwan with
the help it needs to defend itself against unprovoked aggression.

Also expressing disappointment was the Formosan Association for Public
Affairs, a Washington-based Taiwanese-American lobby, whose president Bob
Yang said it was "regrettable that the Obama administration is letting the
PRC [Peoples Republic of China] set the terms for U.S. relations with a
democratic Taiwan."

"This decision simply means that if push comes to shove in the Taiwan
Strait, the U.S. will have to bear a much heavier burden in keeping China at
bay, as Taiwan will simply not have adequate means to defend itself," Yang
said.

"It is well known that China has been engaging in a major military buildup,
while aging F-5 aircraft in Taiwan's air force are falling out of the sky.
Such an imbalance invites aggression."

In its 2010 annual report on Chinese military power, published last month,
the Pentagon said China has a total of 1,680 fighter aircraft, 330 of which
are based within range of Taiwan; Taiwan has 388 fighters.

"The majority of [Chinese Air Force and Navy] aircraft are based in the
eastern half of the country," the report stated. "Currently, 490 aircraft
[fighters, bombers and others] could conduct combat operations against
Taiwan without refueling. However, this number could be significantly
increased through any combination of aircraft forward deployment, decreased
ordnance loads, or altered mission profiles."

'Reverse the pattern of neglect and inattention'

Administration officials speaking on background on Wednesday said the
upgrade of Taiwan's existing F-16s would essentially give them the same
capabilities as the later model variants Taiwan wants - more quickly and at
a lower cost. At the same time they pointed out that they were not saying
that "this is as good as the F-16 C/Ds."

The officials said that, with this deal included, the U.S. will have sold
more arms to Taiwan on Obama's watch than during the previous four years,
adding that Taiwan's request for the F-16 C/Ds was "still under
consideration."

The officials also confirmed that the Chinese ambassador had earlier
Wednesday protested the arms package "and indicated that there would be
consequences for the relationship, but did not specify them." Previous
Chinese reactions to Taiwan arms sales have included a freeze on
military-to-military ties.

A week ago, Ros-Lehtinen introduced bipartisan legislation aimed at
enhancing the TRA, including a requirement to provide Taipei with "the next
generation of F-16 fighters to defend the skies over the Taiwan Strait."

The Taiwan Policy Act of 2011 also supports official visits to the U.S. by
senior Taiwanese politicians, inclusion of Taiwan in a visa-waiver program,
and negotiations towards an eventual free-trade agreement.

An important symbolic provision would permit Taiwan to fly its national flag
over its office in Washington DC, and would allow Taiwan's government, if it
wished, to change the name of that office from the current Taipei Economic
and Cultural Representative Office to Taiwan Representative Office.

(The Obama administration in July 2010 allowed the Palestine Liberation
Organization to begin flying the Palestinian flag at the office it has
maintained in Washington since 1994, and to change its name to PLO
Delegation to the United States.)

"Taiwan is one of our closest and most important allies, and it is time
again for our foreign policy to reflect that," Ros-Lehtinen said when
introducing the bill.

"This legislation seeks to reverse the pattern of neglect and inattention by
the Obama administration toward critical U.S.-Taiwan issues. China must not
be allowed to dictate U.S. policy in the Pacific."

More congressional pressure on the administration comes in the form of a
Senate bill, the Taiwan Airpower Modernization Act, which would require the
U.S. to sell Taiwan the fighters it wants.

The U..S-Taiwan Business Council is urging Congress to pass the legislation,
which was introduced last week by Sens. John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Robert
Menendez (D-N.J.), with bipartisan co-sponsorship.

"This Act and this sale is a win-win for the national security interests of
both the United States and Taiwan, as the new fighters would address part of
the airpower imbalance by modernizing Taiwan's fighter fleet," said council
president Rupert Hammond-Chambers in a statement. "The sale also plays a
vital role for the United States, in expanding forward-deployed capacity
building with a key Asia Pacific security partner."

Accusing the administration of treating Taiwan in a "deplorable" manner,
Cornyn has also threatened to introduce an amendment to a trade bill now
under Senate consideration - which Obama supports - that would mandate the
F-16 C/D sale.

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

--------------------------
Want to discuss this topic?  Head on over to our discussion list, 
discuss-os...@yahoogroups.com.
--------------------------
Brooks Isoldi, editor
biso...@intellnet.org

http://www.intellnet.org

  Post message: osint@yahoogroups.com
  Subscribe:    osint-subscr...@yahoogroups.com
  Unsubscribe:  osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com


*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. OSINT, as a part of 
The Intelligence Network, is making it available without profit to OSINT 
YahooGroups members who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the 
included information in their efforts to advance the understanding of 
intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their activities, methods, 
techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice and other 
intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes 
only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material 
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish to use 
this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use,' 
you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtmlYahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/osint/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    osint-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    osint-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    osint-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to