Robert and I met today and elaborated on some of these items. We discussed the need for attachments within the context of the Mylyn scenario [1]. Robert agreed to put more context in and clarity on what is needed and why. We identified the need as identified by the Application Analysis scenario [2] and updated this scenario with further details.
I took the action to summarize an approach [3] that would meet these needs and based on existing CM provider's support for attachments, we explored Bugzilla and RTC as these examples. This approach [3] is just an early draft form and we can discuss at next WG meeting (Feb 16). [1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/ScenariosMylyn [2] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmScenariosApplicationAnalysisTools [3] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmAttachments Thanks, Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645 ----- Forwarded by Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM on 02/11/2011 04:40 PM ----- Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM wrote on 02/08/2011 02:17:17 PM: > From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Date: 02/08/2011 02:17 PM > Subject: Working session on support for Attachments Feb 11 2:00 Eastern > > Per our last meeting [1] I've scheduled a special working sessions to > elaborate on the scenario for attachments > > This will be led by Robert Elves and myself, anyone is welcome to join. We > will attempt to have some materials updates before the discussion. > > Call-in number from regular WG meetings will be used. > > [1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmMeetings20110102 > > Thanks, > Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
