oslc-recon  

Messages by Thread

• [Oslc-recon] Moving from Mailing Lists to Discourse Brian King
• [Oslc-recon] found some problems with the Reconciliation vocabulary page John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] found some problems with the Reconciliation vocabulary page Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Vocabulary document: missing/broken links John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] Starting work on the next version of the Reconciliation specification Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Starting work on the next version of the Reconciliation specification Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Proposed addition to the specification for representation and reconciliation of clusters Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposed addition to the specification for representation and reconciliation of clusters Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposed addition to the specification for representation and reconciliation of clusters Janet Andersen
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposed addition to the specification for representation and reconciliation of clusters Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposed addition to the specification for representation and reconciliation of clusters Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposed addition to the specification for representation and reconciliation of clusters John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] No workgroup calls on 19 June and 26 June Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] No meeting on 12 June 2013 Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] No meeting Wednesday 04-June 2013 Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Weekly workgroup call Wednesday 29 May 2013 Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Proposal for adding new rdf:type values for crtv:SoftwareServer Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposal for adding new rdf:type values for crtv:SoftwareServer Janet Andersen
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposal for adding new rdf:type values for crtv:SoftwareServer Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Proposal for adding new rdf:type values for crtv:SoftwareServer John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] WG call 2013 22-May Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] When applying reconciliation rules, should we take into account case sensitivity ? Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] No meeting Wednesday 15-May 2013 Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Meeting info Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] No WG meeting Wednesday 08-May 2013 Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Links from Recon spec to Appendices A & B are broken Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Links from Recon spec to Appendices A & B are broken Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Links from Recon spec to Appendices A & B are broken Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Links from Recon spec to Appendices A & B are broken John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Links from Recon spec to Appendices A & B are broken Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Agenda for 17-Apr meeting Tuan Dang
• Re: [Oslc-recon] V2.0 spec is final Fw: Oslc-steeringcommittee Digest, Vol 10, Issue 10 Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Request to Approve OSLC Reconciliation V2 to transition to Final Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Reconciliation V2 to transition to Final Ersch, Rainer
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Reconciliation V2 to transition to Final Keis, Andreas
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Reconciliation V2 to transition to Final John Wiegand
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] [Oslc-steeringcommittee] Request to Approve OSLC Reconciliation V2 to transition to Final Mik Kersten
• [Oslc-recon] Common IT Resource Type vocabulary Martin P Pain
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Common IT Resource Type vocabulary Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] reconciliation specification going to final Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Comments on Recon spec Steve K Speicher
• [Oslc-recon] reconcilation requirements on resources oslc_asset:Asset and crtv:Path Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] OSLC reconciliation specification entering finalization phase Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] indicate status of vocabulary terms Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Question from AM workgroup regarding re-use of resource oslc_asset:Asset Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Question from AM workgroup regarding re-use of resource oslc_asset:Asset Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] requirement that a provider MUST provide an oslc:serviceProvider property for its resources Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] requirement that a provider MUST provide an oslc:serviceProvider property for its resources Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] requirement that a provider MUST provide an oslc:serviceProvider property for its resources John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] requirement that a provider MUST provide an oslc:serviceProvider property for its resources Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] requirement that a provider MUST provide an oslc:serviceProvider property for its resources John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] naming property change request from Marcin Luczinsky Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] naming property change request from Marcin Luczinsky Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] naming property change request from Marcin Luczinsky Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] addition of resource types OperatingSystem and Tablespace to crtv vocabulary Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] addition of resource types OperatingSystem and Tablespace to crtv vocabulary Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] addition of resource types OperatingSystem and Tablespace to crtv vocabulary Steve K Speicher
• [Oslc-recon] remove URIs used for categorization of SoftwareServer, SoftwareModule, ServiceInstance Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] remove URIs used for categorization of SoftwareServer, SoftwareModule, ServiceInstance Joe Ross
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] remove URIs used for categorization of SoftwareServer, SoftwareModule, ServiceInstance Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] remove URIs used for categorization of SoftwareServer, SoftwareModule, ServiceInstance Steve K Speicher
• [Oslc-recon] clarify that reconcilable resource type is specified using rdf:type property Joe Ross
• [Oslc-recon] spec comments John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] Interesting history items around reviews/approvals related to Recon Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Interesting history items around reviews/approvals related to Recon John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] Issue with name "Common Resource Type Vocabulary" Steve K Speicher
• [Oslc-recon] New MUST in Core John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] Next Reconciliation Workgroup call Tuan Dang
  • [Oslc-recon] Next Reconciliation workgroup call Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] questions and comments on the Performance Monitoring spec and example RDF/XML - 4a John Arwe
• [Oslc-recon] Reconciliation workgroup meeting 2012 Sept 21 Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] Minutes from 2012-Sept-13 Reconciliation group meeting Tuan Dang
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Minutes from 2012-Sept-13 Reconciliation group meeting Steve K Speicher
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] Minutes from 2012-Sept-13 Reconciliation group meeting Tuan Dang
• [Oslc-recon] First meeting TODAY Sept 13 John Arwe
  • Re: [Oslc-recon] First meeting TODAY Sept 13 Steve K Speicher