Getting some offline discussion onto the mailing list. > 4) PerformanceMonitoringRecord Properties table > > a) Why is the dcterms:title property required for a performance > monitoring record? (It also wasn't in the example > ComputerSystem performance monitoring record in the example RDF/XML.) > This may be a copy and paste error. dcterms:title is only required > for ResourceShape instances according to the Core Spec.
Julie responded: Would like John's feedback here. 4: dcterms:title - Each domain spec defines what it needs to satisfy its scenarios. min=0 on this sounds right to me. Detail: Min=0 seems reasonable for perf mon (I'm not sure what title I'd give to a resource whose only type was PerfMonRec ... this is not what your implementation is producing I realize, but it's the general case). Since your implementation also claims its instances comply with Reconciliation, you need to honor any restrictions it levies too; again, Min=0 seems reasonable since title's semantic is "human readable" which makes it sound "not required" for reconciliation purposes. Copying that WG for their awareness. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
