Hi all, I'm posting this in case we don't get a quorum on the weekly call.
We had defined URIs of the form http://open-services.net/ns/crtv/siType#something It turns out that there are issues with this 1 - the workgroup claimed ownership only of the namespace http://open-services.net/ns/crtv# 2 - it seems to restrictive to define URIs that can only be used for one resource type ( in the example above, restricted to the ServiceInstance resource ) We had already defined 2 sets of URIs http://open-services.net/ns/crtv#something and http://open-services.net/ns/crtv/siType#something with the thought that we could allow products that are already implementing the spec to migrate without difficulties I have talked to the implementing teams and they have agreed to move to the URIs using the valid namespace. Therefore, there is no need to keep the .../siType# namespaces in the spec. The sections affected are : http://open-services.net/wiki/reconciliation/OSLC-Reconciliation-Specification-Version-2.0/#ServiceInstance-category-URIs http://open-services.net/wiki/reconciliation/OSLC-Reconciliation-Specification-Version-2.0/#SoftwareServer-category-URIs http://open-services.net/wiki/reconciliation/OSLC-Reconciliation-Specification-Version-2.0/#SoftwareModule-category-URIs I'll remove them this week unless there are objections. Thanks ! T Tuan Dang Tivoli OSLC governance, OSLC Reconciliation workgroup lead, Tivoli Common Data Model Internet: [email protected] phone: (919) 224-1242 T/L 687-1242
