Where in your sequence of steps are you *required* to follow a link from R to R's SP? On the original thread you forwarded to the list WOP, I followed this same line of reasoning and was unable to answer that question. Which is why I had to look for a different scenario, in the same email (or a variation if you prefer - potato, potatoe, for some values of spuds).
That scenario does not assume a reconciled resource as input, just any random URL for a reconcile-able resource. It does not assume any set of reconcilED resources. It's way simpler. Best Regards, John Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario "Oslc-Recon" <[email protected]> wrote on 02/21/2013 09:01:04 AM: > From: Tuan Dang/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > To: [email protected], > Date: 02/21/2013 09:19 AM > Subject: Re: [Oslc-recon] requirement that a provider MUST provide > an oslc:serviceProvider property for its resources > Sent by: "Oslc-Recon" <[email protected]> > > Hi John, > > So we want to report if a resource is/is not monitored. > > Let's say there's a reconciled resource R . This is a collection of > reconcilable resources {(R1 from SP1), (R2 from SP2), etc... }. We > can then say if there > is no Rx from Spx that services a monitoring domain in that > collection then R is not monitored and gets added to the report. > > Is that enough to require that resources have a reference to their SP ? >
