We have resource and property definitions which are in the vocabulary but not yet used in the specification, e.g. crtv:StorageVolume. WG members agree that StorageVolume should be in the vocabulary as it is a common artifact that can be discovered and created by multiple providers. But, as we have no scenario yet that calls for reconciliation of StorageVolume thus we do not have any reconciliation requirements for it in the spec. And such requirements might be coming in the future.
The gist is that we want to indicate the status of a vocabulary term. I am experimenting with the 'Vocabulary Status Vocabulary'[1] as it's called and particularly with vs:term_status with the value of "testing" . Take a look at the crtv doc[2] [1] http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/note [2] http://open-services.net/wiki/reconciliation/File%3Areconciliation.ttl Thanks ! T Tuan Dang Tivoli OSLC governance, OSLC Reconciliation workgroup lead, Tivoli Common Data Model Internet: [email protected] phone: (919) 224-1242 T/L 687-1242
