Nick Crossley/Irvine/IBM wrote on 05/11/2012 01:13:53 AM: > From: Nick Crossley/Irvine/IBM > To: "OSLC SCM" <[email protected]>, Darcy Wiborg Weber/Irvine/ > IBM@IBMUS, Gray Bachelor/UK/IBM@IBMGB, [email protected], > Cc: Kartik Kanakasabesan/Durham/IBM@IBMUS, Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/ > IBM@IBMUS, [email protected], John Kellerman/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS > Date: 05/11/2012 01:13 AM > Subject: Update about status of OSLC SCM, and discussion about the way forward > > OSLC SCM workgroup members: > > It has been a long time since our last workgroup meeting, and while the spec > has still not been finalized, there have been several developments in the > configuration management space and some new requirements from other OSLC
> domain including the PLM-ALM workgroup. > > I would like to explain to the workgroup why the spec has not progressed to > finalization, some of the reasons for the lack of adoption, and how we might > address those issues by broadening the potential audience while at the same > time lowering the cost of adoption by simplifying the spec. > > Two possible times for this review meeting are: > Tuesday May 22nd at 6am US/Pacific, 9am US/Eastern, 2pm in the UK. -1 > Thursday May 24th at 9am US/Pacific, 12 noon US/Eastern, 5pm in the UK. +1 > Please let me know which of these times you could attend; if you are unable > to attend either but you are still interested in the future of OSLC SCM, > please nominate a substitute. I don't think I'm a required attendee but would like to be part of it. I know we are well connected on this and therefore I do not need a substitute. > After this initial discussion, it is my hope that we will commence a new > stage in the life of the workgroup, resuming regular meetings as we work on > a revised spec. For this reason, please also consider what times would work > for you in the future. I'll work with whatever schedule works for other key required workgroup members. - Steve
