I have been amazed by the richness of the responses to my question! Three more responses follow.
Since I got some feedback about feeling overwhelmed by the size of the distribution lists, I am sending these responses only to those on the listserv. Thanks, Peg ---------- > From: C CHAPMAN <ankh...@prodigy.com> > To: o...@tmn.com > Subject: Re: An OSI Policy Question > Date: Monday, March 31, 1997 2:06 PM > > -- [ From: c chapman * EMC.Ver #2.5.3 ] -- > > Peggy et. al, > The basic premise for me with "work for service" is that no one be left > out of the organization due to lack of resources. If people are asking > because they want recognition for what they are doing, I'd like them to > pay and find another way of doing the recognition. However, if someone > wants to be part of OSI (USA) and can't afford the fees, then "work for > service" seems to me a great idea. I'd like the BOD to take an approach > which keeps "policy" and "rules" as fluid as possible. > -- > Connie > ankh...@prodigy.com