Thanks Joelle for the image of table-deprived engineers trying to cover their balls. This one goes in my story-chest.
Thinking back on the many OS meetings I've been a part of, it is actually rarely that we've been sitting in a circle. At OSonOS in Denmark we had this huge barn to meet in, so there we sat in a perfect (and huge) circle, but for instance at the Practice of Peace in Seattle, the shape we sat in was more of a square with rounded edges. And this reminds me of another very pleasing shape, namely the super ellipse which is a cross between an ellipse and a square. It was invented by a french mathematician and popularized by Piet Hein, who used in designing tables, stadiums, roundabouts, buildings and much else. You can find the mathematical definition here: http://www.2dcurves.com/power/powerse.html Here's what Piet Hein himself had to say about that shape: /Man is the animal that draws lines which he himself then stumbles over. In the whole pattern of civilization there have been two tendencies, one toward straight lines and rectangular patterns and one toward circular lines. There are reasons, mechanical and psychological, for both tendencies. Things made with straight lines fit well together and save space. And we can move easily -- physically or mentally -- around things made with round lines. But we are in a straitjacket, having to accept one or the other, when often some intermediate form would be better. To draw something freehand -- such as the patchwork traffic circle they tried in Stockholm -- will not do. It isn't fixed, isn't definite like a circle or square. You don't know what it is. It isn't esthetically satisfying. The super-ellipse solved the problem. It is neither round nor rectangular, but in between. Yet it is fixed, it is definite -- it has a unity./ -- Piet Hein Cheers Alex Alexander Kjerulf alexan...@kjerulf.com www.kjerulf.com +45 2688 2373 Adress: Tagensvej 126, lejl. 613 2200, Copenhagen N Denmark Joelle Lyons Everett wrote:
The circle brings many benefits--not the least is that it is a very ancient way for people to gather, and so brings energy gathered through the aeons. I think creating a circle bounds the gathering, helps to focus on the theme, creates a container that give participants a sense both of safety and of awe. I remember reading in the newspaper a few years back about a planned gathering in Seattle--I think a demonstration or protest of some sort. The article named a tribal elder and shaman who had come to the site every day for a week before, and walked prayerfully around the entire geographical space included in the proposed march. I often remember this story when I am preparing to facilitate Open Space. The circle truly does put people in a position of equality, and participants sense this right away, with or without mention. I usually invite the sponsor to open the space from the center of the circle, if he or she is willing. They feel a bit awkward or vulnerable, and this feels just right. As for getting rid of tables, I still chuckle over the report of a friend, who years ago was beginning to have engineering problem-solving groups meet in a circle, without a table. I asked him how that was going. "It's really funny," he replied, to stand in the center and watch all these guys trying to cover their balls." My 2 cents' worth-- Joelle * * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu, Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
* * ========================================================== osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu ------------------------------ To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu, Visit: http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html