----- Original Message -----
From: "Artur Silva" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: Givens -- Again : some comments


> Thanks, for speaking up, Chris.
>
>
> --- chris weaver <[email protected]> wrote:
> > So, Artur, Harrison, et al:  Does this hurt the
> > event?  Does this disrespect
> > the people?
>
> No, I don't think it does and (if I understood well)
> it is even an interesting way to make some previous
> undiscussable ideas of the sponsor discussable.
>
> But, as you recall, my main point about "givens" has
> always been the word itself. Who "gives" the "givens"?
> It must be some sort of unquestionable authority.
> Unless they would not be called "givens"...
>
> So, when you ask the sponsor "are there any givens?"
> aren't you acccepting the command and control way?
> Could't that be rephrased as, for instance, "are there
> any ideas or conclusions that you consider
> undiscussable in this meeting?" (and then proceed in
> the same direction you explained).
>
> Artur
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> *
> *
> ==========================================================
> [email protected]
> ------------------------------
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
> view the archives of [email protected]:
> http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html
>
> To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
> http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist
>

*
*
==========================================================
[email protected]
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of [email protected]:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to