You've seen Tom Atlee's description of the recent "Evolutionary Salon".  Here 
are my reflections, mostly on the partnership between TWC and OS.


We began our first evening in a circle with a check in, people speaking to what 
attracted them to the Evolutionary Salon.  We described the process that we'd 
be using for the conference as a living experiment in being an evolutionary 
social system.  This let us use our real time experience as a mirror for our 
learning.

The next morning, Juanita Brown took us into a World Cafe.  I got to 
participate.  We focused on a question about our burning questions.  I think I 
had the honor of experiencing TWC at its very best.  Juanita is a master of her 
craft.  When reflections were harvested at the end of the session, people said 
they were touched by the experience, discovering the feeling of connection to 
each other, the synergy among their burning questions.  They expressed 
excitement at the sense of intimacy and kinship they felt.  

I have to admit that as a participant, I felt as I did the last time I 
experienced TWC: constrained by the expectation of staying at the table.  It 
was quite a contrast for me to hear the excitement of others in the room!  


We began the Open Space in the afternoon.  Of course, people jumped in with 
their sessions.  They seemed to be doing just fine.  Come the closing circle, 
several people expressed distress at their experience.  One went so far as to 
ask if we could go back to the comfort and intimacy of a cafe-like format.  I 
thought to myself, "freedom shock" is alive and well.  The mix of people at the 
conference included scientists and people of spirit.  It seems there was 
something of a clash of cultures going on in many of the sessions.  I just 
listened -- no defending, no fixing.

As is my practice in multiple day events (learned from Spirited Work), the 
convening group met to reflect on how things were going after the evening 
circle.  The meeting was open to any who wished to join us.  A few people did.  
One wondered if we needed to do something to "push the group" in the direction 
we wished them to go (as if we knew what direction that was!).   We discussed 
the fact that the discomfort people experienced wasn't necessarily a bad thing, 
that it provided an opportunity for something new to emerge.  I encouraged my 
nervous sponsors to trust that things were going just fine.

That evening I found myself in a butterfly conversation with a couple of people 
distressed by the "yang" energy they ran into, feeling unsafe to express their 
"yin" selves.  We talked at length about what it means to take responsibility 
for what you love.  They left the conversation thinking about how to come fully 
present tomorrow in all their "yin" glory.  

The next morning, someone announced 3 new "yin" meeting spaces.  There was much 
laughter as people bantered about yin-ness and yang-ness and its intersection.  
Turns out there had been LOTS of butterfly conversations and those who had felt 
distressed, found their way, dissipating the angst before it became a real 
issue.  In fact, from that point forward, the OS just flowed.


A reflection on how TWC affected the dynamic. 
It was clear that people had a felt sense of community very quickly through 
TWC.  I think that the move into OS created that condition that Harrison calls 
"freedom shock".  It's possible that the contrast heightened the shock.  That 
said, I believe the sense of connection created during TWC enabled those who 
were distressed to seek out the friends they had made rather than completely 
check out (of course, being in a remote location would have made it difficult 
to leave!).  I wonder if that is a benefit of a cafe prior to OS -- to create 
relationships that might support people to stay engaged if they have a tendency 
towards freedom shock?


THE TWC MEETS OS EXPERIMENT
The OS continued as usual over the next couple days.  During our preparation 
for the conference, the planning team (Tom Atlee, Michael Dowd and myself) 
discussed the possibility of convening evening sessions on "what are we 
learning?"  On the third evening, Tom and I decided that it would be useful to 
do so and that we'd do it using "TWC meets the law of two feet".

Our session question: what patterns do you see emerging?  About 12 people came. 
 We started in groups of 4 with an agreement that we'd come together as a whole 
to see what we'd uncovered in about an hour.  In the meantime, people were 
invited to stay or move as they wished.  As context, I said that we knew from 
the cafe experience that patterns become visible quickly when people move 
around periodically, so moving is useful.  At Juanita's suggestion, we had 
blank cards in the clusters so that groups could send an idea to another group 
if they wanted.  They could also send an emissary.  

That was it.  Basically, it was OS with groups of four discussing the session 
topic.  What happened was a kick.  Two groups were quite intent in their 
conversations, clearly not moving, just going deeper and deeper.  The third 
group eventually dissipated, a couple people going to sleep, the others joining 
the two hot groups.  And then others started arriving.  They just opted for one 
or the other of the groups.  The conversations were animated and intense.  At 
one point, the group I was in sent a card with an idea to the other group.  In 
all, I think about 20 people were there by the end of the evening.

After about an hour, we came together as one.  First one group described what 
they'd learned, then the other group did the same.  The second group mentioned 
that they used the idea they'd received on the card.  The remains of the 
original third group added their thoughts into the mix.  Llyn Peabody, new to 
graphic recording, but clearly in her element, took notes, drawing an 
incredible visual map of the weave of our stories.  The result was electrifying 
and became the basis for some breakthrough ideas the last day!

One side note -- someone said during the session that they often looked for 
what was missing to understand a situation.  I pointed out that the yin/yang 
laughter in the morning signaled something rather remarkable that was missing 
from our living experiment of an evolving social system: angst.  Rather than 
fragmenting into conflict, people had transcended it.  That drew a raised 
eyebrow or two as people digested how the space had made room for conflict to 
be embraced with grace.


A reflection on the TWC meets OS experiment
Next time I'm a participant in an OS and have a large group, I'd likely split 
up again in this way.  It was a great way to reflect on our question when the 
group was large.


THOUGHTS FOR THE FUTURE
Juanita and I talked the next morning about our impressions of the intersection 
of TWC and OS.  We discussed several strengths of TWC -- creating a sense of 
community and uncovering patterns quickly.  

Given my own biases, I wouldn't use TWC as an opener unless the client had some 
specific situation that moved things that way.  

I can imagine experimenting with doing an evening reflection with people 
beginning in small groups.  I can see this as a natural flow of the energy as 
people wander in, talking together before coming into a single circle.  I think 
this could be a low key transition that actually makes it easier to convene the 
evening circle.  By following the energy of people arriving for the close, 
inviting them into reflection as they arrive rather than waiting for everyone 
before beginning, I think something simple and useful could occur. 


Juanita suggested explicitly encouraging people post their sessions in the form 
of questions.  It made me smile when Harrison recently posted: 
I  think of every Open Space gathering as a (potentially) question rich 
environment. That is why I always suggest to people that they phrase the theme 
as a question, as opposed to a statement.

Questions are certainly a place of coming together.

So, that's about all of my musings on this subject.

yours, on a warm evening in Seattle,
Peggy


________________________________
Peggy Holman
The Open Circle Company
15347 SE 49th Place
Bellevue, WA  98006
(425) 746-6274 

www.opencirclecompany.com

*
*
==========================================================
osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu
------------------------------
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options,
view the archives of osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu:
http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html

To learn about OpenSpaceEmailLists and OSLIST FAQs:
http://www.openspaceworld.org/oslist

Reply via email to