Jeff -- I always think of Brainstorming as "Thinking of good ideas for somebody else to do." Little passion and no responsibility = 0 productive movement.
ho Harrison Owen 7808 River Falls Dr. Potomac, MD 20854 USA 189 Beaucaire Ave. (summer) Camden, Maine 04843 Phone 301-365-2093 (summer) 207-763-3261 www.openspaceworld.com www.ho-image.com (Personal Website) To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of OSLIST Go to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org -----Original Message----- From: oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Aitken Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 2:52 AM To: World wide Open Space Technology email list Subject: Re: [OSList] Sticky dots Q reminds me that the difference between a brainstorm and an open space agenda creation is that the latter is based on passion and responsibility. some items on the brainstorm list may not make it to the open space agenda wall if the person doesn't actually feel very passionate or responsible about it after all. or it may make it to the wall, but then nobody comes to the session, and the convenor writes a short report to handle it and moves to another topic. jeff On 2/11/13, Jeff Aitken <r.jeff.ait...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would allow the open space process to do the work. I don't see a > reason to do anything else. I could be misunderstanding of course. > > if you are using a 'standard' open space agenda creation process, > inviting people to put a topic on a sheet of paper and post it on a > wall with time and place, then i'd allow the wall to be filled with > topics, and then explain the process of moving topics around based on > the wishes of the convenors. and let them move things around. > > let the law of mobility take care of the rest. and then reflect at the > end of the day, and they might add and delete and move topics for the > second day. > > jeff > > > On 2/11/13, Tricia Chirumbole <tri...@investorswithoutborders.net> wrote: >> ok, so I just asked a question re: the need for prioritization of >> issues and an overwhelmingly large pool of issues in my previous post. >> >> I guess part of the answer is sticky dot voting. Cool. I will have to >> improvise asking people to keep track of their dots using markers >> since I will have no time to get dots, but that should be ok in a >> small gorup of 13...not ideal - other thoughts on this are welcome. >> >> my questions are - is it ok to do prioritization at outset of day 1? >> And, if so, would it be better to first generate a marketplace w/o >> times selected and prioritize them, then have initiators select >> time/place? or vice versa - neither sound ideal to me. >> >> thanks so much!! >> >> -- >> Tricia Chirumbole >> US: +1-571-232-0942 >> Skype: tricia.chirumbole >> > _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org _______________________________________________ OSList mailing list To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org To subscribe or manage your subscription click below: http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org