Dear Patricio,
the "Day after" contributions are collected by the participants themselves on a poster-sized (A1) mind map... everyone who wants to add something to the mindmap gets up, walks to the poster and puts it there in his/her own writing or expands on a strand of the mind map... pretty independent of the size of the group this takes 12 to 18 minutes. This happens very close after the beginning of the Planning Meeting and is the first "self-organized" step (I just stand next to the mind map holding a felt tipped marker... if no body steps up the Planning Meeting shuts down, well, to tell the truth, this has never happened).

The neat thing about this mind map is that the sponsor or whoever is in charge for documentation rolls up the mind map (and the other documents that are created) and posts it again at the review meeting of the Planning Group shortly after the event. On the average, somewhat rough, 85% of the stuff that went onto the mind map (aspirations, descriptions of the future, perspectives...) are considered by the Planning Group to have actually been actualized. Not any other approach I know of that has such a record.

Aside from it being used for "evaluation", the mind map is also posted again at the "Next Meetings" of which there is at least one about 10 weeks after the event (this Next Meeting is already announced with date and time and place in the initial invitation to the event that the Planning Group created). Its a very quick way to find ones way back to the event... all that is required is that it is posted at the Next Meeting(s), no need to comment or speak on it.

On another level, the mind map action leaves a deep imprint (not that I had envisioned this but it showed up in working with it): members of the group wanting to contribute to the mind map STAND UP... WALK FROM THEIR CHAIR TO THE MIND MAP... TOUCH IT AND WRITE ON IT PERSONALLY... AND WALK BACK TO THEIR CHAIR (sometimes taking a little detour via the buffet to get coffee or an apple, after all, this was exhausting). In other words, its the first step in taking physical ownership of whats happening... a foretaste of open space (mind you, the Planning Meeting is not an os event, its a step by step structured and guided event with the "little" difference that nothing happens at the Planning Meeting that the participants dont do themselves... this has its dark side: They actually are planning their own event and if the sponsor is not properly briefed that they WILL do this and assume leadership and that he needs to understand this, big problems might appear).

Have a great day
mmp



On 31.05.2013 14:27, Patricio Bastian wrote:
Dear Elder,

to helpanswer yourconcern.............“I specially like your starting
looking to the Day After....What is happening the day after the event?
Which perspectives do I see now? What has changed? This, I´ll try next
time, yes! “

I mentionthat I'm developing my dissertation with that question.

I enclose the approach:

*Problem Formulation*

The general question asks whether the Open Space is an effective
technique to produce sustainable organizational change and if it is
superior to other organizational intervention techniques, which are
based on smaller groups and a highly structured setting with a view of
the objectives. This question can generally be divided into the
following questions:

• Are individuals able to self-organize when subjected to an
unstructured context?
• Open Space Is capable of producing organizational responses that the
Organization needs?
• Do organizational change (to have occurred) sustainable over time?
• Do on these indicators than traditional techniques in terms of
efficiency and effectiveness?


*Research Objectives

General Purpose*

Evaluate the effectiveness of the technique of Open Space, representing
intervention techniques in large groups, to produce an organizational
change that accounts for internal and external demands of the Organization.

*Specific Objectives*

• Analyze the operation of the Open Space and organizational skill.
• Measure and analyze the impact that technology has on the organization.
• Compare the Open Space with other organizational intervention technique.
• Contribute empirical and theoretical analysis of intervention
techniques in large groups.


Of course, I appreciate your comments to the discussion in my thesis.
Your input is a valuable aid.

Thank you, thank you very much.

Sincerely,

*Patricio Bastian Duarte*

**

*Note: *Mynative language isSpanish. Pleaseexcusetypos

*De:*oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org
[mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] *En nombre de *Eleder_BuM
*Enviado el:* viernes, 31 de mayo de 2013 5:50
*Para:* Michael M Pannwitz; World wide Open Space Technology email list
*Asunto:* Re: [OSList] What to do when a conflicted and important part
is missing?

Hi Michael!

I´ll say that till now, I used to hold much less detailed preparation
meetings.

I would just come, say hello, and, more or less,...

1. explain briefly OST for the ones that don´t know it: best conditions,
how the event will go on, what the resulsts are,...

2. open a wide conversation to get to the core of their invitation. Then
I would write a draft and fix it with the core group during the days after.

3. Spend dome time thinking on the invitation process: who&hows,...

4. speak about all the logistics, place, food, materials, helped by a
mind-map in which I have organized all this info

And it has worked ok so far.

Knowing that your more detailed and paused focus worked hundred of times
makes me open to try (some part of) it next time.

I specially like your starting looking to the Day After....What is
happening the day after the event? Which perspectives do I see now? What
has changed? This, I´ll try next time, yes!


It´s weird for me, anyway, to spend a 10:00-16:00 time slot in the
preparation,... and it really makes sense, the sponsors and the
facilitator start opening space in a calm and passionate way from the
preparation meeting!

Thanks so much for your wise advice and rich information pieces,

best,

Eleder

2013/5/30 Michael M Pannwitz <mmpannw...@gmail.com
<mailto:mmpannw...@gmail.com>>

Dear Eleder,
the core idea of the planning meeting is that its not me as facilitator
to do stuff that the sponsor of the event (and his planning group) can
do themselves.
So the first step is to find out who the sponsor is. This might sound
silly, but in real life it is often surprising that it is not clear at all.
If you find, that you yourself are the sponsor you can stop worrying and
find a facilitator for your event.
If you know you are not the sponsor and know who the sponsor is, tell
him/her that, after it is clear it is going to be an event using OST
(which means the prerequisites are in place, this must not be clear to
you but the sponsor needs to find out), that a planning group needs to
gather.
This group should in some way mirror the organisation/community/group
that is expected to gather in the open space event. Usually, the
planning group consists of 5 to 20 people.
They need to be invited by the sponsor to the planning meeting.

Ok, here is the design of the planning meeting which takes 3,5 hours
either before lunch or later in the morning with lunch as a break or in
the afternoon or early evening... preferrably in the space in which the
os also is planned

10:00   Break, Arriving, Coffee …..


10:30   Welcome by the sponsor who introduces the facilitator for the
following steps

         Introducing ourselves   All
         Introducing the agenda  Facilitator

10:45   The Day After
         What is happening on "Monday, June 17, 2013, the day after the
event? Which perspectives do I see now? What has changed?

The group itself creates a Mindmap with their thoughts/inputs

11:15   My Theme for the Open Space event
         Individually                            3 minutes,
         All announce their themes               2 minutes,
         Work in subgroups                       15 minutes
         Reporting to the whole group            5 minutes
         Weighing the Themes                     10 minutes


Break beginning at noon
Time for a look at the large meeting room and lunch


2:00    Our Theme / provisional
         Characteristics of an action-orienting theme….
         A small group (3 to 5) of volunteers sit in front of the entire
group and designs the theme for the meeting,  provide an extra chair for
inputs from the large group, fish-bowl style.

2:45    Who all needs to be at the conference?
         So that the expectations expressed for the day after under the
chosen theme will actually be met
         Brainstorm, identify participants essential for the process
         Check the Theme, still ok?

3:15 Nuts and Bolts
         Collect things to do
         Who will take care of what?

3:45 How was it today


4:00 End

This design has been used hundreds of times and works with any group,
even teachers, lawyers, scientists and mixtures of them and especially
well with children and in neighborhood groups in all cultures around the
globe.

I will seperately send you a pdf documentation with pictures of a
planning meeting.

Greetings from Berlin
mmp



On 30.05.2013 16:56, Eleder_BuM wrote:




Michael, you say,...
/"if they in fact meet and follow the simple design I have described on
this list."/
/
/could you tell us more about  this design?



Thanks so much for your attention,

Eleder

     ____

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
<mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
<mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org>
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org



_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org


--
Michael M Pannwitz
Draisweg 1, 12209 Berlin, Germany
++49 - 30-772 8000



Check out the Open Space World Map presently showing 410 resident Open Space Workers in 72 countries working in a total of 143 countries worldwide: www.openspaceworldmap.org
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
.

Reply via email to