Great stuff in here; let me please address some of the juicer questions, responses inline:

On 10/22/13 2:25 PM, Diane Gibeault wrote:
Dan, you confirm that for Agile, the suggested practices (Scrum etc) are up for discussion during the OST, that invitation should be the way of doing business at every level, including the implementation stage.
Yes, and we must encourage the people to play.
Yes, and play is a censored term in most orgs, so in OAA we use 'experiment' instead. (the sanitized term for play)
In that case, there are real advantages for Open Agile Adoption (OAA) to refer to these implementing practices in a more generic way. On the Agile web site, information on the implementation phase seems to be presented in a more prescriptive fashion, with specific structured methods listed. If that's not the case, I may have read it too fast or it's a presentation issue. Both can be easily fixed.
Can you please provide a link to "the Agile web site", where "information on the implementation phase seems to be presented in a more prescriptive fashion?" I do not know which site you mean...
Naming one or even a few structured existing tools gives the impression there is a limited number of options and that there is no room for participants to come up with or create their own ways to get a job done. This can feel more like control and mandate, an opposite mindset to the "invitation" approach you favor Dan for Agile, an approach that is congruent with the spirit of OST which encourages invitation as a way of working and of managing on an on-going basis, so that organizations can be more agile.
Yes, and to be clear, a practice is 'agile' if it (at a minimum) does not offend the Principles of the Agile Manifesto, seen here:
http://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html
....and the values, seen here:
http://agilemanifesto.org/

Ideally, a strong practice will strongly honor the Manifesto principles, not merely refrain from offending them. Scrum is a pre-fab set of practices and agreements (almost said the G-word there...) that do honor the Manifesto.
Hence the popularity of the Scrum form.


<CONFLICT WARNING>

   Many 'agile people' will totally disagree with :

"...a practice is 'agile' if it (at a minimum) does not offend the Principles of the Agile Manifesto"

Disagreement is perfectly OK. Let's suspend disbelief for now, and proceed...

</CONFLICT WARNING>


And now to my point: they people can dream up any practice that fits this criteria. If they do it is agile. They need not use Scrum, Kanban etc. I always encourage them to dream and imagine and invent NEW practices that fit them and their needs, subject to the Agile Manifesto criteria. Now, it ain't as easy as it looks....
Sharing tool ideas before and during the OST meeting is not precluded but how it's presented can make quite a difference on how it's perceived by participants, i.e., how open and real the invitation is.
Yes, and the way to address this is to put the training AFTER the initial OST meeting in Open Agile Adoption. Because training before the OST (instead of after the OST) sends the "mandate/we-made-an-investment-in" signal. Agree 100% and join you in this idea.
Before an OS meeting, there is true benefit in reflecting on implementation with organizers but they should not become attached to tools or outcome. They must understand that the real discussion on implementation should take place during the meeting with all participants, and after with the emergent leadership.
Yes, and this is 100% the intent to Open Agile Adoption, because ENGAGEMENT is the jet fuel of high performance. (not practices!)
The IT industry tells us that a very large number of IT projects fail because they don't allow people to discuss and co-create the implementation; they have no sense of ownership.
Yes, and this is an epidemic train wreck of absolutely epic scope worldwide
Letting the implementation systems emerge, allowing voices to be really heard, if not making a true choice of a way to implement whether it's a system or tool or not, all of this can create that sense of ownership.
Yes, and this is the name of the game 100%. When people are not making choices, they are clearly not free to engage
Dan you said earlier (Sept 30 OS List) 'I believe that people in the Agile/IT world (and people in general) tend to "medicate" their pains/worries/etc with processes. tools. frameworks. certifications. etc.'
Yes, and here is a blog post on that:
http://newtechusa.net/agile/medication/
Leaving the implementation processes open as you said today, is likely to help reduce that medication mentality.
Yes, and one benefit is that peace can and will break out
Diane


Diane Gibeault & Associe.es-Associates
  Tel 613-744-2638, diane.gibea...@rogers.com

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* Dan Mezick <d...@newtechusa.net>
    *To:* World wide Open Space Technology email list
    <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
    *Cc:* World wide Open Space Technology email list
    <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:21:31 AM
    *Subject:* Re: [OSList] OST / Gaming

    when a group is introduced to a definite process and OST is part
    of the equation, the net result is often that the process itself
    is treated like anything else in OST -- up for discussion.

    Bingo...thats the whole point. Whatever the suggested (formerly
    MANDATED) practices are, Scrum or whatever...are now up for
    discussion. This is the *entire* reason to use the OAA approach.
    Further, this is not manipulation, or its 1st cousin, persuasion.
    This is invitation in the truest sense if the word. If OAA is used
    for persuasion, this is a 100% corruption of the actual intent and
    purpose. OAA does not seek to persuade.

    As for spirit...give it time. Things may ripen presently, or not.
    I'm watching for signs of an up-trend.


    Sent from my iPhone

    On Oct 22, 2013, at 10:59 AM, "Harrison Owen" <hho...@verizon.net
    <mailto:hho...@verizon.net>> wrote:

    Dan -- I guess it is time for me to come clean and reveal all my
    ulterior motives. Frankly, I could care less if you and others use
    OS by way of an introduction to Agile/Scrum. I have some
    reservations that, to the extent that SCRUM is a prescribed
    process (whether entered voluntarily or not), OST may not be quite
    what you want. My experience has been that when a group is
    introduced to a definite process and OST is part of the equation,
    the net result is often that the process itself is treated like
    anything else in OST -- up for discussion. That said, it surely
    can't hurt and is probably much better than whatever alternatives.
    As an old Swedish friend of mine put it, "OST is the WD-40 of
    group work. One shot will loosen up just about anything."
    But all that is just the tip of the iceberg. I think the
    discussion will really get interesting and fruitful when we begin
    to take  hard look at what I might call the "Agility Function" of
    OST. How does it work and why? How can we amplify the effect? I
    suggested that agility is a natural act. True? If so, could it
    become an everyday natural act?
    On your "favorite question" -- OST as a Spiritual practice... I
    did write a paper some years ago for a book that never happened
    titled, "Open Space and Spirit shows up."
    http://openspaceworld.com/spirt_shows.htm I confess that I share
    Linda Stevenson's unease with talking about OS and Spirituality.
    But then again...
    Harrison
    Harrison Owen
    7808 River Falls Dr.
    Potomac, MD 20854
    USA
    189 Beaucaire Ave. (summer)
    Camden, Maine 04843
    Phone 301-365-2093
    (summer) 207-763-3261
    www.openspaceworld.com
    www.ho-image.com (Personal Website)
    To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives
    of OSLIST Go
    to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
    *From:*oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org>
    [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] *On Behalf Of
    *Daniel Mezick
    *Sent:* Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:41 AM
    *To:* oslist@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
    *Subject:* Re: [OSList] OST / Gaming
    Jenifer,


    Yes, and if you feel claustrophobic *reading* about Agile, let's
    imagine how claustrophobic the people inside these 'agile'
    organizations feel...

    ...when they are told by an entirely well-meaning authority,

         that they *must* "do" something, and even "be"
    something...entirely /unfamilar/...without their explicit _consent_.


    Is this or is this not the definition of a closed space?

    And finally, my favorite question: Is OST actually a
    group-spiritual practice?

    Dan




    http://newtechusa.net/agile/spirit/
    */We all want rapid and lasting Agile adoptions./*//The Open Agile
    Adoption technique (OAA) can help. The OAA technique is drawing
    deeply from the book SPIRIT by Harrison Owen. It's an amazing and
    even essential book for any person who is serious about achieving
    a rapid and lasting Agile adoption. In a very real sense the book
    SPIRIT by Harrison Owen, first published in 1986, is the first
    (and perhaps the only) book written on how to achieve a rapid and
    lasting Agile adoption.
    "...I have written this book for friends and colleagues, known and
    unknown, who find themselves in the midst of a transforming world,
    and are resolved  to look beneath the surface to the underlying
    source of change. This source, which has become manifest in the
    form and structure of our organizations, I call Spirit." --
    Harrison Owen, Prologue, SPIRIT: Development and Transformation in
    Organizations. (Circa 1986)



    www.OpenAgileAdoption.com <http://www.openagileadoption.com/>
    http://www.infoq.com/articles/open-agile-adoption-1
    http://www.infoq.com/articles/open-agile-adoption-2




    On 10/22/13 8:14 AM, Jenifer Toksvig wrote:

        Harrison, you said:

        >> ...  our conversation always seems to have (must have?)
        some frame of reference with certain metaphors and images.
        [...] It is not so much about right or wrong but rather
        capacity to communicate. <<

        It's all about Story, yes, absolutely. I was just saying to
        Dan in an email that I had never heard of Agile until this
        conversation, so I went to read all about it... and then had
        to stop reading about it because, as a story, it makes me feel
        claustrophobic. Especially as a story that is being linked to OST.

        OST is my guide in so many ways. It's my comparison story: the
        thing against which I find myself measuring life stuff.

        - because it's not a story. Oddly, I think I made that strong
        connection with OST because it seems to me that it is just how
        things are, rather than how anyone might want to say things
        are. Which is not that odd at all, actually, now I come to
        think about it.

        Although I am not in any way religious, perhaps those who are
        feel the same way: that their belief system is not a story,
        but the core truth of the world. It seems strange to me that
        they wouldn't challenge it to make sure it isn't a story in
        disguise, though. I challenge OST every day.

        In fact, maybe that's what I mean by 'comparison'. I don't
        measure life against it, so much as measure it against life,
        and I am continuously delighted to find that it is simply a
        description of how life happens, nothing more and nothing less.

        How wonderful, how refreshing to find a true *description* in
        a world full of takes and truths.

        When I write stories, I think the characters already exist in
        the place of potential, and all they do is choose me to be
        their conduit onto the page; I'm the right conduit for a
        specific few. I am not at all surprised that OST chose you.
        Thank you for being open to being chosen, and for staying open
        when you recognised it for what it was.

        Jen x

        *Jenifer Toksvig
        *www.acompletelossforwords.com
        <http://www.acompletelossforwords.com/>

        *The Copenhagen Interpretation
        *www.thecopenhageninterpretation.co.uk
        <http://www.thecopenhageninterpretation.co.uk/>




        _______________________________________________

        OSList mailing list

        To post send emails toosl...@lists.openspacetech.org  
<mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org>

        To unsubscribe send an email tooslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org  
<mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org>

        To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:

        http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

--
    Daniel Mezick, President
    New Technology Solutions Inc.
    (203) 915 7248 (cell)
    Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog
    <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter
    <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.
    Examine my new book:The Culture Game
    <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for
    the Agile Manager.
    Explore Agile Team Training
    <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and
    Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>
    Explore the Agile Boston
    <http://newtechusa.net/user-groups/ma/>Community.
    _______________________________________________
    OSList mailing list
    To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To unsubscribe send an email to
    oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
    http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

    _______________________________________________
    OSList mailing list
    To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:OSList@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To unsubscribe send an email to
    oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
    <mailto:oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org>
    To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
    http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org




_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

--

Daniel Mezick, President

New Technology Solutions Inc.

(203) 915 7248 (cell)

Bio <http://newtechusa.net/dan-mezick/>. Blog <http://newtechusa.net/blog/>. Twitter <http://twitter.com/#%21/danmezick/>.

Examine my new book:The Culture Game <http://newtechusa.net/about/the-culture-game-book/>: Tools for the Agile Manager.

Explore Agile Team Training <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-training/> and Coaching. <http://newtechusa.net/services/agile-scrum-coaching/>

Explore the Agile Boston <http://newtechusa.net//user-groups/ma/>Community.

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to