Hi Christine
I have worked in nominally 'mental health' areas for many years. Designing a
range of events for various purposes, I found a few things of interest -
1. Practical things first - resist the 'over helping', restrain the enthusiasms
of the 'helpful' and minimise the special attention to those perceived to have
special challenges - often they don't - make general arrangements for
supportive/relaxed/unimposing spaces [chilled zones, obvious exits]. The more
'we' think 'they' need special help, the more this may become true, and equally
denies the truth that 'who doesnt need this help?' Although once there were
'criminally insane' prisoners in an event, hand-cuffed to their forensic health
care workers, their inputs and engagements were as sane and probably the most
relevant of any. The notion of individuals making their own decisions to
join/leave groups and manage their own time, communication and activity is a
challenge for the institutionalised - how many organisations are free of such
behavioural effects? Your art of facilitation (calm liberation of the space,
gentle encouragement, presence) is the
main thing to bring on the day.
2. Subtler observations I would share:
- the 'norms' (people who are 'us' not 'them') bring a looooot of baggage to
the thing - the psychodynamicals among us can have a field day with the
introjections etc etc;
- specifically the psychiatrically credentialled professionals have the most
difficulty of any specific group I have ever met (including the heads of state,
monks, prisoners, scientists, artists, asylum seekers and homeless) to get
involved at the EQ level with anyone else in the room - a day or so in and a
few are communicating almost like humans;
- mental health labels can be applied to most of us some of the time - serious
(in terms of lifestyle-impacting), chronic or acute psychiatric disorders can
mean some people have altered realities some or most of the time, and/or be
chemically suppressed. This brings versions of contribution that add to the
diverse mix that we can experience in any group. The principles of OST are
among the most sense-making for such diversity and one is reminded anew of how
universally helpful it is to stay mindful of these qualities of human society.
So I guess the intentions of your planners are nice, the time element is a red
herring, and the perceptions of who is 'included' and how this is achieved may
require something quite other than what might be going on or proposed
In friendship
Anne
>________________________________
> From: christine koehler via OSList <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
>To: OSLIST <oslist@lists.openspacetech.org>
>Sent: Sunday, 5 October 2014, 7:18
>Subject: [OSList] Opening space with people with psychiatric disorders
>
>
>
>Hi everyone,
>
>
>
>
>I would like to know if you have experienced an open space (circa 150 people)
>in which people with psychiatric disorders are among the participants.
>How did it go ? How did you prepare it ?
>
>
>I am asking because during pre-work of an open space, the topic came out, as
>one of the organizer is working with them in order to help them be included in
>the society as any other citizen.
>
>
>Of course I understand the idea and I second it, but I wonder how to prepare
>it (and if we have enough time for that...)
>
>
>
>
>
>Christine --
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSList mailing list
>To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
>To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
>To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
>http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org
