Paul said: “Perhaps we can share these stories of how we have "done things 
differently". I'd love to hear how so many different "selves" have organised in 
the many different moment in which they found themselves.”

 

Good idea Paul... and while we’re about that, might be a parallel, perhaps 
prior question: Why do we do what we do? What is the intent or purpose?

 

I suppose the simple answer might be something like – To have an effective 
meeting. You know the sort... where people are actively engaged productive of 
positive and useful results. Should that be the intent, my logic tells me that 
our words/actions must be minimal, limited to only that which produces the 
result. Additional “flourishes” though fun and interesting only take up time 
and delay the “main event.” Something like what Michael described (....  “in a 
later round of one of Chris' programs, a young woman volunteered and when the 
moment to do her thing arrived, she simply said, "okay, the theme is... and the 
markers and paper are there in the center.  do it!") would become the Gold 
Standard.

 

I actually did something like that myself. In an early WOSONOS. It seemed to me 
that since everybody there was already “doing” OST... we really didn’t need to 
go through the “standard opening.” So I just said, “There’s the papers and the 
wall. You know the drill. Go for it.” I thought that was brilliant, but 
everybody just sat there and looked at me. Seemed like we needed something more 
– like the Principles, The Law...Something.

 

The reaction of the group, all those years ago gave me pause for thought and 
raised a marvelous question that I have been savoring ever since: Why do I do 
what I do? Subsequently I have found myself reflecting on every word, motion 
and pause during that brief time of the Opening. Have I got it just right? I 
surely don’t know and for sure it keeps evolving. But when I go through a 
description of the 5 Principles, for example, I do so in part to give the 
people something to think about during their time in Open Space – But mostly I 
do it so that they may have something to take with them. Seems like they can be 
useful for everyday living as well.

 

I will be happy to share my learnings, most of which are already out there in 
“The User’s Guide,” not with the intent that we all do it the same way but 
rather to encourage everybody to be highly critical of what they do and why. At 
the end of the day, each one of us must do “it” in our own way, and I think one 
thing I have totally learned is that personal integrity and authenticity is the 
critical ingredient for effectively opening space. The details will vary, but 
it all gets richer when we carefully ask, what are we doing and why?

 

Harrison 

 

 

 

 

Winter Address

7808 River Falls Drive

Potomac, MD 20854

301-365-2093

 

Summer Address

189 Beaucaire Ave.

Camden, ME 04843

207-763-3261

 

Websites

www.openspaceworld.com

www.ho-image.com

OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
OSLIST Go 
to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

From: OSList [mailto:oslist-boun...@lists.openspacetech.org] On Behalf Of paul 
levy via OSList
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 4:31 AM
To: Chris Corrigan
Cc: Harrison Owen; World wide Open Space Technology email list
Subject: Re: [OSList] Open Space by the book?

 

What I glean from Chris's fine post (and many others over recent years) is that 
people have been responding to a changing world with experimentation, 
playfulness and creativity. Open Space technology has changed in that swirl. 
There are stories to tell, experiments to share.

 

There seems to be a "default" model still at play - the "original one" that 
Harrison tends to "stick with".  But there is much delightful evolution and 
innovation around it.

 

Perhaps we can share these stories of how we have "done things differently". 
I'd loved to hear how so many different "selves" have organised in the many 
different moment in which they found themselves.

 

Then OST might not enter the "mainstream" but simply become the flow it was 
always going to be.

 

warm wishes

 

Paul Levy

 

 

On 17 November 2014 22:03, Chris Corrigan <chris.corri...@gmail.com> wrote:

I have opened space many many times without ever mentioning the four 
principles, the law or any other assorted wisdom associated with WHY the 
process works.

 

My basic practice is to explain HOW we will organize ourselves, pointing out 
the tools we have to do so: paper, markers, bulletin board.

 

I talk about passion and responsibility “Please only post a topic you will 
personally show up for…” and I mention the freedom of choosing and moving.  

 

That is all that people need to get into Open Space.  I’m not sure the 
principles or the law or anything else are necessary pre-conditions for the 
appearance and deployment of Open Space in a meeting.  I think they help 
explain what is happening, and I think they help people let go of control a 
little.  

 

All of us as facilitators would do well to remember that people are not coming 
to a meeting to be wowed by a process that you personally love.  They are 
coming to get work done.  And so it behooves us to put a lid on our passions 
for the mechanics of the process and simply open space so that work can get 
done.  Later on you can reflect on WHY it happened like that.

 

As for the idea that OST is mainstream, well perhaps not yet.  But within the 
world of people who think a lot about this sort of thing it is widely known.  I 
feel like these days people call and ask about OST having experienced it 
whereas in the 1990s and early 200s people were calling because it seemed like 
a good idea, but they had never experienced it.  So not mainstream per se, but 
widely accepted and known in a small part of the world.

 

At any rate it has been a long time since I have asked the question at the 
start of a meeting and seen zero hands go up.  There seems to be at least one 
person who knows Open Space.  

 

Whether we use the original instructions or modifications or innovations, 
whatever you do, do it very very well.  Be very conscious, model good 
leadership and never stop embodying invitation.  Lots of people have witnessed 
poorly planned Open Spaces run by facilitators who are too nervous to let go of 
their control of it.  We all owe it to our clients and participants to meet 
their needs well with a process that helps them get unlocked from the stuck 
places they get into.

 

Here’s my book again for you to download.  I hope it inspires your practice.

 

The Tao of Holding Space <http://www.archive.org/details/TheTaoOfHoldingSpace> 

 

Chris 

 

 

On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:09 PM, John Baxter via OSList 
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote:

 

Nice reflection Harrison.

 

You've unfortunately created too many loose ends to inspire a neat reply.  So 
here is a messy one.

 

Regards the simplest recipe for Open Space, to what degree have the Law and N 
Principles (and the animals) been critically tested?  To be honest, these have 
never really resonated for me and I've always used a different variation each 
time searching for something that feels right (and no longer than it needs to 
be).

 

I think it's a long bow to describe Open Space as mainstream, or anywhere near 
it.  It has spread to all corners of the globe perhaps, but it is still the 
System A alternative, islands within a System B world.  I would hazard 90% of 
those who have been to conferences and meetings and like gatherings have not 
heard of it... (speaking at a conference on cocreation and placemaking 
recently, I requested a hands-up and had a whole TWO of hundreds confess to 
acquaintance)

and even if 90% had, I'm sure less than 1% of the gatherings they attend are 
consciously designed to unlock self organisation.

 

What you describe of the permutations of the practice matches what I see 
(though I'm too new to know differently), but I can't see how this could be 
because of a tipping point as the practice is mainstreamed.

 

Maybe that's just where I participate.

 

Regards the permutations and combinations... bring them on!  This thread could 
quickly follow all sorts of rabbit holes on this one, so I might save those 
thoughts for another day.

 

Cheers




 

John Baxter

Cocreation Consultant & ​Co​Create Adelaide Facilitator

 <http://www.jsbaxter.com.au/> jsbaxter.com.au | CoCreateADL.com 
<http://cocreateadl.com/> 

0405 447 829

​ | ​

@ <http://twitter.com/jsbaxter_> jsbaxter_

 

Thank you to everyone who came, helped or spread the good word about City Grill!

Summary and links: cocreateadl.com/localgov/grill-summary/

 

 

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 5:37 AM, paul levy via OSList 
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote:

The problem with sticking with things is you might just end up stuck.

 

Ho hum.

 

Paul Levy 

 

 


On 13 Nov 2014, at 18:14, Harrison Owen via OSList 
<oslist@lists.openspacetech.org> wrote:

Open Space, in its “original” form is sparse simplicity to say the least. Ten 
to fifteen minutes introduction, and it is off the races, or in my case, off to 
take a nap. The evolution of this format followed a simple dictum: “Think of 
one more thing NOT to do.” Over time in my practice I simply removed one more 
element. The first to go were so called, “warm up exercises.” But it went down 
from there. My surprise was that the less I did, the better it got... which 
seemed to be the exact opposite of many of my colleagues’ experience with the 
methods and approaches they had created. Their simple guide books gave way to 
400 page Manuals with additions and extensions. Of course, there were times 
when people remarked to me that OS was so simple it couldn’t possibly work. But 
it did. Simply sit in a circle, create a bulletin board, acknowledge the 5 
principles and the Law – and Go to Work! That’s it. That’s all.

 

I confess that I do love elegant simplicity, and so there is a large part of me 
that would stick with the “original” for that reason alone. To this may be 
added the fact that this “elegant simplicity” apparently violated essentially 
all the principles and practices of management that I knew about. To some 
extent this was a source of no small amount of embarrassment, for after all 
when what you see, do, and think is at odds with the Received Wisdom there are 
obvious questions about your grasp of reality. But, the disparity between what 
I was witnessing and what  (I was told) I should be experiencing has led to a 
marvelous quest into the strange new world of self organizing systems. Rich and 
rewarding indeed.

 

Now it seems that the world is changing (or at least our perception of that 
world) such that the strange environment of self organization is no longer so 
strange. What appeared odd, counter-intuitive, impossible is now almost 
mainstream. Not quite but getting there. And if so, perhaps it is now time to 
let go of that old “elegant simplicity” in all of its appealing purity... and 
plunge into the marvelous world of combinations and permutations. And why not? 
It could be a lot of fun.

 

I can see the possibilities, but I doubt seriously I would change. Senile 
sentimentality for sure, AND I actually have another concern which I think may 
be determinative. I suspect that OST (simple version) may be the best Training 
Program going when it comes to the introduction of folks to the High Arts of 
navigating a self organizing world. And best of all it is Experiential Learning 
from the start. Training and Doing are absolutely united. It is not talking 
about self organization it is being intentionally in that mode. And any added 
complexity/parallel program will tend to obscure the central mind bending fact 
– It’s happening all by itself. 

 

We have talked about this “ training” function before, usually under the 
heading of Chris Corrigan’s notion of Training Wheels. That is definitely good 
start, but only a start. We can do more, and it could be a real kick. 

 

So I plan to stick with the original – with the hope and intent that lots of 
new people will drop by to experience the incredible, productive freedom of 
losing control, and then come to understand that it is actually their 
birthright. They only have to claim it.

 

Harrison

 

 

 

Winter Address

7808 River Falls Drive

Potomac, MD 20854

301-365-2093

 

Summer Address

189 Beaucaire Ave.

Camden, ME 04843

207-763-3261

 

Websites

www.openspaceworld.com <http://%20www.openspaceworld.com/> 

www.ho-image.com <http://www.ho-image.com/> 

OSLIST To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the archives of 
OSLIST Go 
to:http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org


_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

 

 

_______________________________________________
OSList mailing list
To post send emails to OSList@lists.openspacetech.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oslist-le...@lists.openspacetech.org
To subscribe or manage your subscription click below:
http://lists.openspacetech.org/listinfo.cgi/oslist-openspacetech.org

Reply via email to