could you eventually tell the practical differences between A*2-Phase, A* classic, HH x Java and HH x C++?
ralph lumen schrieb am Freitag, 6. März 2026 um 11:37:17 UTC+1: > thank you! I realized how fast even a long route is now calculated, very > good indeed. but as it means that all maps out of maybe a dozen GB of data > have to be renewed if you actually would only need some 100mb. hm, that > maybe difficult without (w)lan ... > > how much slower is A*2? > > [email protected] schrieb am Freitag, 6. März 2026 um 08:51:49 UTC+1: > >> Hi! The new OsmAnd route calculation algorithm requires all maps to be >> from the same date. This dialog may occasionally appear in error because >> OsmAnd uses a straight-line analysis to evaluate the route. If you are >> certain that all necessary maps are present and share the same date, open >> the "Missing map" dialog and select "Use downloaded maps" to force the >> application to use the existing data. >> >> If your maps have different dates and you prefer not to update them, you >> must revert to the previous route calculation algorithm. To do this, enable >> the "OsmAnd Development" plugin under Menu – Plugins. Then, navigate to >> Menu – Settings – [Select Profile] – Navigation settings – Route parameters >> – Development – Routing type, and select "A* 2-phase. >> On Thursday, 5 March 2026 at 12:04:55 UTC+2 ralph lumen wrote: >> >>> I have all the maps which I need to plan a trip on my phone, but osmand >>> does not want to calculate the route without the newest maps. how to force >>> it to accept the existing ones? >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OsmAnd" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/2fa3780b-9ef9-4a84-a8b0-3d5d25675d1an%40googlegroups.com.
