You could do that, or look at the accuracy of the reading for both sources, then use that to help with the calculation. You could have some kind of scaling factor so the accuracy is inversely related to how much the reading affects the average. This way's more difficult and I'm not sure how much it would really help, so I'll be happy if you just take out network fixes. Kieran
"Stan Berka" <[email protected]> wrote: >Thanks ZeroG for committing! > >To eliminate the issue of fake initial accelaration in issue #74, I'm >thinking to use only GPS fixes and ignore the network. Anyone sees any >disadvantages with this approach? >droidguy > > >> >> On 2 Feb 2010 16:05, "Guillaume Rosaire" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I'll have a look at it... > >> 2010/2/2 Chris Andrew <[email protected]> > > >> >> >> > >> > Kieran, >> > >> > Can you help? >> > >> > ### Thanks for the patch, Stan. >> > >> > Chris. >> ... >> 2010/2/2 Stan Berk... > > >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Osn-dev mailing list >> [email protected]... > > >_______________________________________________ >Osn-dev mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.kentgeek.org/mailman/listinfo/osn-dev >_______________________________________________ >Osn-dev mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.kentgeek.org/mailman/listinfo/osn-dev
_______________________________________________ Osn-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.kentgeek.org/mailman/listinfo/osn-dev
