Hi Acee, Generally, the draft looks useful/good. One question: TLVs 32768-65535 are marked for Private Use -- what is the method for distinguishing the meaning for these TLVs when two different implementations utilize the same Private Use TLV? Should OUI be placed in the first 3 octets? If so, can the I-D capture this? Thanks, Jonathan Sadler
________________________________ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Acee Lindem Sent: Fri 2/15/2008 11:15 AM To: OSPF List Subject: [OSPF] WG Last Call for OSPF Link-local Signaling -draft-ietf-ospf-lls-04.txt This starts the WG last call for the subject document. The target status is Proposed Standard. The WG last call will begin today and will end March 1st, 2008 at 12:00 AM EST. Note that a previous revision (not including OSPFv3) of this protocol extension was published as an experimental RFC 4813. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf ============================================================ The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reproduction, dissemination or distribution of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you. Tellabs ============================================================
_______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
