My take is that RFC 5329 should have stated that it updates RFC 3630. RFC 5728 
is not dependent on RFC 5329. 

As for the errata, I don't disagree that the suggested changes improve the 
text. However, given I don't see them as warranting an errata. Afterall, we in 
the IETF are an international organization and I don't see the benefit of 
wordsmithing the English here. Comments such as these should be made before the 
RFC is published.

Thanks,
Acee  

|-----Original Message-----
|From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
|Behalf Of RFC Editor
|Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 2:36 PM
|To: Alfred H?nes
|Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; RFC Editor; 
|[email protected]
|Subject: Re: [OSPF] RFC 5786 metadata, references, and IANA registry
|
|Hi Alfred,
|
|We don't determine which references should be included as 
|normative or informative.  We might make suggestions about 
|this if someting seems odd to us, but whether references 
|appear as normative or inforamtive is usually decided at the 
|working group level (I believe).  You may want to discuss this 
|with the authors and working group chairs, as we are unable to 
|provide you with any additional information about why RFC 3630 
|was a normative reference while RFC 5329 was listed as an 
|informative reference.
|
|Thanks,
|Sandy
|
|
|On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 07:15:51PM +0100, Alfred H?nes wrote:
|> Hello,
|> as an additional remark to the Errata Note I have filed for RFC 5786
|> (eid=2085):
|> 
|> I do not understand why:
|> 
|>   -  Ref. [RFC5329] is Informative and [RFC3630] is Normative
|>      (both RFCs are mentioned in a comparable manner, e.g. in
|>      Section 1.1 (3rd para) and Section 5), and
|>   -  the RFC only  "Updates: 3630"  (and not also 5329).
|> 
|> Further, -- that's perhaps more a deficiency of the IANA 
|> Considerations of RFC 5329 but could be corrected by directives to 
|> IANA -- I would appreciate if the OSPF TE parameters registry would 
|> more clearly indicate its applicability to OSPFv3, e.g. by giving an 
|> additional ref. to RFC 5329 at the top level.
|> 
|> 
|> Kind regards,
|>   Alfred H?nes.
|> 
|> --
|> 
|> 
|+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|> | TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes   |  Alfred Hoenes   Dipl.-Math., 
|Dipl.-Phys.  |
|> | Gerlinger Strasse 12   |  Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: 
|-18         |
|> | D-71254  Ditzingen     |  E-Mail:  [email protected]            
|         |
|> 
|+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
|_______________________________________________
|OSPF mailing list
|[email protected]
|https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
|
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

Reply via email to