Acee Thank you for information. But a lot of vendors already supported the high link metric to announce as stub. Therefore I think the draft should describe both of high link metric and R-bit. What do you think if the author add only one or two sentence which mentioned exist of R-bit to current internet draft?
Regards, -Shishio (2012/02/28 7:23), Acee Lindem wrote: > Hi Shishio, > If I remember correctly, there was discussion as to whether to just use the > R-bit rather than the high link metric for OSPFv3. Given the goals of the > draft, I'd be in favor of this change. > Thanks, > Acee > On Feb 24, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Shishio Tsuchiya wrote: > > > Hi > > After this draft be WG documents,it expired. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-rfc3137bis/ > > > > Was there any objection? or just maintenance issue? > > > > Regards, > > -Shishio > > _______________________________________________ > > OSPF mailing list > > OSPF@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
