Hi Acee, Support as coauthor
Cheers, Jeff -On 03/07/14 17:45, "Acee Lindem" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I¹d like to start a 2 week OSPF WG adoption poll of the subject draft. >>The encodings are very close to those in the OSPFv2 draft (which is a WG >>document) other than the fact that they take advantage of the OSPFv3 LSA >>extensions which simplifies things. However, it makes a lot of sense to >>advance these drafts separately since the OSPFv2 draft is not dependent >>on any other drafts and there are existing implementations. >> >>Thanks, >>Acee >> >>On Jul 2, 2014, at 1:48 PM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Peter, >>> I will review this version and start the adoption poll. >>> >>> Others - please read and comment. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Acee >>> On Jul 2, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Acee, WG, >>>> >>>> I have updated the OSPFv3 SR extension draft. >>>> >>>> Given that OSPFv2 SR extension draft has been accepted as a WG item, >>>>it would make a lot of sense to make the OSPFv3 SR draft WG document as >>>>well. >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> -------- Original Message -------- >>>> Subject: New Version Notification for >>>>draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt >>>> Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 04:47:17 -0700 >>>> From: <[email protected]> >>>> To: Stefano Previdi <[email protected]>, Jeff Tantsura >>>><[email protected]>, Jeff Tantsura >>>><[email protected]>, "Rob Shakir" <[email protected]>, Hannes >>>>Gredler <[email protected]>, "Wim Henderickx" >>>><[email protected]>, Clarence Filsfils >>>><[email protected]>, Wim Henderickx >>>><[email protected]>, Peter Psenak <[email protected]>, >>>>Stefano Previdi <[email protected]>, Clarence Filsfils >>>><[email protected]>, Peter Psenak <[email protected]>, "Rob Shakir" >>>><[email protected]>, Hannes Gredler <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> >>>> A new version of I-D, >>>>draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension-02.txt >>>> has been successfully submitted by Peter Psenak and posted to the >>>> IETF repository. >>>> >>>> Name: draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-extension >>>> Revision: 02 >>>> Title: OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing >>>> Document date: 2014-07-02 >>>> Group: Individual Submission >>>> Pages: 29 >>>> URL: >>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-o >>>>s >>>>pfv3-extension-02.txt >>>> Status: >>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf >>>>v >>>>3-extension/ >>>> Htmlized: >>>>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospfv3-ext >>>>e >>>>nsion-02 >>>> Diff: >>>>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-psenak-ospf-segment-routing-ospf >>>>v >>>>3-extension-02 >>>> >>>> Abstract: >>>> Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end >>>> paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of >>>> topological sub-paths, called "segments". These segments are >>>> advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS and OSPF). >>>> >>>> This draft describes the necessary OSPFv3 extensions that need to be >>>> introduced for Segment Routing. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >>>>submission >>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >>>> >>>> The IETF Secretariat >>>> >>>> . >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>OSPF mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
