Hi Uma, Thanks for the review and support. See inline.
On 8/27/14, 7:10 AM, "Uma Chunduri" <[email protected]> wrote: >Support. >Obviously well written and well though through. I see this is the anchor >document for ISIS. > >Nits: >1. Security can be tricky and it depends on the deployment situation for >auto configs. Though Section 7 address this aspect as part of security >consideration. > It might good idea to discuss as sub-section in the main draft and >leave section 7 for any implications of key changes, security algos etc >defined. I can do this and will refer to the new section from section 7. After some consideration, I see your point. When a reader gets to the ³Security Considerations² section, they expect the functional specification portion of the document to have already been completed. >2. I see Section REF is still pointing to 6506. I will fix this. Thanks, Acee >-- >Uma C. > >-----Original Message----- >From: OSPF [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy >Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 11:43 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [OSPF] Working Group last call on "OSPFv3 Auto-Configuration" - >draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-07.txt > >All, > >We are starting a working group last call on the subject document. Draft >has been stable for a while, and only recent change was one of the >author's email address ;-). > >WGLC will end at Noon PST on 8th Sept 2014. > >Please review the document and send any final comments prior to the WGLC >deadline. > >Regards, >-Abhay > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf > >_______________________________________________ >OSPF mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
