On 09/02/2014 01:23 AM, Hannes Gredler wrote: > hi tony, Fuehrt' Di' Hannes ;-) > > requiring send-side ordering is certainly intended well, > but that in itself does not guarantee ordered delivery > at the receiving end :-/.
I think I pointed that out already below. full ack. > > IOW in case you have an application that needs both > the 1) prefix-LSA and the 2) extended-prefix-LSA you need > to have the logic that checks presence of 1) > at the receiving end anyway. > > rather than doing things on the send-side let me suggest > to check if you have got your act together during > route-computation time. (this is a bit akin to > IS-IS fragment zero handling - ala - if frag zero > is not present then all non-zero > frag content has to be disregarded). That is required anyway, the ordering was meant as suggestion for implementors but given what Peter/Acee write (extented can be sent without the normal LSA, this makes no sense apparently). --- tony _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
